Alyce
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2012
- Messages
- 13,121
- Reaction score
- 52,562
I think the FBI's involvement is in a role of assisting a small town police department in a highly complex, multijurisdictional case. I'm not dismissing what you are saying but the reality is that the FBI only has jurisdiction for federal crimes and the only federal crimes that may have occured in this case are related to SS fraud and that would only be for a few thousand dollars. If the kids died in September and Lori was getting $6000 a month she would have collected, at most, (November, December, January, February) = $24000 illegally. Surely it would have stopped when she got arrested and the October payment would be for September when the kids were known to be alive. So while i agree the FBI would not normally concern themselves with small crimes, I don't think there involvement here is about the severity of the crime. I think they are involved because of the complexity and the resources they can provide.I don't think the FBI spent the resources they have for months on a couple missing kids (tons are missing everywhere) without a solid foundation of evidence. You think the FBI's end goal is to maybe charge someone for 5 years? FBI is also a business in a sense and ROI is without a doubt a factor
CV murder in Gilbert AZ (Maricopa County)
AC murder in San Tan Valley AZ (Pinal County) [now known not to be a crime]
JJ and Tylee disapperance and abandonment charge in Rexburg ID (Madison County)
JJ murder in ?? ??(?? County)
Tylee murder in ?? ?? (possibly WY) (?? County)
CD concealment of evidence in Salem ID (Fremont County)
TD murder in Salem ID (Fremont County)
The previous search was related to Tammy Daybell's death. The body was in the ground so they were not looking for a body. Search warrants have to be pretty specific and based on a probable cause affidavit sworn by a police officer. Usually anything found that is not within teh scope of the warrant is inadmissible in court later so they do not look for anything not specifically stated in the warrant. They would not have brough cadaver dogs for example because there would be no probable cause to look for a body.I’m so sorry to Chime in at the end of all of this but can anyone give me a brief synopsis of why it took so long to search the property I do understand they already searched it before but why didn’t they find the bodies I’m very confused right now
that video you linked says it is tylee and jj so hmm and its MSN
I think it’s absurd to think that with all of the technology that we have today that we could not have sent a drone over that property 1 million times and picked up Infared evidence immediately. This is the most incompetent Investigative work I have ever experienced and I’m disgusted.
PS: K9 unit was on scene prior to any digging, and certainly may have alerted to the spots. The rush may be b/c CD inquired about a new mobile home going up in that spot.
It would be fascinating to learn that he rented a bobcat or mini excavator while Tammy was away!Would agree with much of the above but I don't see any evidence that owned a bobcat, etc...They also have a flat plot on a not very large land...I too am around much of what you state above...However, what I see is daily is not what I even remotely see in this situation.
Besides that, I’m sure that sort of thing would require a warrant. You are conducting a search on private property, even if you aren’t actually setting foot on it.Disagree - Those that did the investigate work and folks would gently point to educate in response to this post from a new member that
Thermal image cameras (”infrared imaging”) pick up the heat emitted by an object, so they read heat signatures of live beings, not cold dead ones... which over time were buried under frozen tundra and a foot of cold snow. So, if that's the reason the OP is calling them incompetent - nope. I don't see any such thing as incompetence so far - cases take a while to build and the focus is always on conviction.
MOO.
Disagree - Those that did the investigate work and folks would gently point to educate in response to this post from a new member that
Thermal image cameras (”infrared imaging”) pick up the heat emitted by an object, so they read heat signatures of live beings, not cold dead ones... which over time were buried under frozen tundra and a foot of cold snow. So, if that's the reason the OP is calling them incompetent - nope. I don't see any such thing as incompetence so far - cases take a while to build and the focus is always on conviction.
MOO.
Hi and welcome!Interesting interview with the Rexburg mayor who may have let slip that the remains are JJ and Tylee. Sorry if this has already been posted, this is my first post.
Rexburg mayor hopes discovery of human remains at Daybell home brings closure to family
Skol och tack sa mycket!KonaHona there is finally light at the end of the tunnel. I remember chatting on here with you like 4 months ago... Skol!
Yeah, this is the most complex case I have ever followed. I actually anticipated many more months passing before we saw Chad charged with anything. Now it looks like both children have been found, and double murder charges are around the corner.Well said...I guess it’s easy to be a casual observer and conclude poor police work but with multiple players, multiple crimes, multi state and a background story that oozes Jim Jones’ish I don’t see incompetence. I think the Arizona investigation was lousy but everything else seems well done for the circumstances LE was in.
Actually, no. Look at the original probably cause warrant for Lori's arrest. It took much more than just 2 missing kids.Two missing kids are probable cause
I think tomorrow (today for you Mr. Jitty) is going to be a big news day for this story.Chad made the NZ 5.30 news
He finally made the big time
Besides that, I’m sure that sort of thing would require a warrant. You are conducting a search on private property, even if you aren’t actually setting foot on it.
Who knows if it would have worked in the first place.
Yeah, it doesn’t make much sense that she would talk, unless they had a staggering amount of evidence against her. I just don’t see that.I don’t think Lori squealed at all. Quite the opposite. It’s in her best interests to keep her mouth shut and be suspected of abandonment than open her mouth and admit she’s at least guilty of being an accessory, a conspirator, and/or other murder-related charges, or trying to trade info for lesser/manslaughter charges.
Nope. Someone rumbled them. I bet they both need new underwear.