I guess not all of us agree with each other in all aspects of the case but with this scenario I have a question. It is my opinion that everyone associated with the case realizes IDI. I think they have already told us actually. Some of us get really frustrated with RDI arguments. And now, I, even get frustrated at myself everytime I try to reason with them. It always just makes me get angry. So lets say, the police get a DNA match and it becomes pretty obvious that they have the right guy. And it ain't associated at all with a Ramsey being an accompliss. Should we rub it in their faces? Should we get a pass from bannings so we can let them know just how they perceive logic needs to change for them in the future? If it did turn out RDI, I think they should be able to call me any name or say anything to me without banning. Can we make a deal with the mods that however the case turns out either RDI or IDI gets to have a free for all on the other?