I can't see that it's gonna make a big deal anyway. Surely she was read prior to being jailed. The in Session th's focused on the fact that it was then that she told the Zanny lie and that those statements would be inadmissable but she said the same stuff after being jailed. That's her story and it hasn't changed, so what's the big deal? Course the audacity of the Universal fiasco wouln't be presented, but it's noti like she would get a pass on the Zanny story if the motion is upheld. Zanny did it Is still the " story" and what else could it be even if the motion carries? Agree?