Let's continue discussion here. Please keep TOS in mind because this is clearly a passionate topic. I think there are some that agree she was not guilty and think justice was served. There are some that think she is guilty, but the not guilty verdict was the only one that could be rendered based on evidence. There are also some that think the evidence should have rendered a guilty verdict but the prosecution did not paint the picture clearly enough for the jury to see it. If you agree with the verdict for any reason, why do you feel that way? Let's hear from you even if you just respect the verdict and don't fall into any of those camps clearly. From mrsu's original OP: If you disagree with the verdict, please talk about it. Did the state prove the case and the jury just got it wrong? Let's have this discussion without attacking each other personally.