Walko
Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 75
The same thing happened to Rubber City Boy, he was misidentified as an Asian male when he was really a black male. They do seem to have an abysmal record when it comes to UIDs.
The same thing happened to Rubber City Boy, he was misidentified as an Asian male when he was really a black male. They do seem to have an abysmal record when it comes to UIDs.
I wrote to an investigator in 2016 about this description error in NAMUS, she didn't see the error right away. When I wrote back and pointed it out,I never heard back. Can we request reports from the Chicago Medical Examiner on unidentified persons?The same thing happened to Rubber City Boy, he was misidentified as an Asian male when he was really a black male. They do seem to have an abysmal record when it comes to UIDs.
I don't see that person listed in NamUs anymore. Maybe he was identified?I wrote to an investigator in 2016 about this description error in NAMUS, she didn't see the error right away. When I wrote back and pointed it out,I never heard back. Can we request reports from the Chicago Medical Examiner on unidentified persons?
Those ear wires are similar, in that they are flat above the loop, but the one for the person found has thicker wire, imho, the loop is fairly large which is not typical for a machine made one. The other end is even with the loop, and that can vary and it is meant to vary with style or weight of earrings, longer that the loop though is pretty typical and the ones you posted have a longer wire. I have those, and I alter them as the shape makes them easy to go in the ear, but also makes them easy to fall out...These look similar to the decedents, flat french ear wires? I can't really tell if they were gold or silver.
The scale is off... the one found with the earring is pretty tiny, it is 10mm and probably 15mm complete (they put it on the pad crooked... they just don’t care!) 25mm is an inch. A pendent is not usually that tiny, and the broken off parts probably had the “attachment” to whatever. At 15 or so mm, it is more likely an earring, even without seeing an ear wire.
I can’t guess the size of his pendant but it is, based in it and the size of say his chin, I would guess larger than one inch? It is quite a lovely piece.
I doubt many policemen have the time to be craft jewelers, or understand the size. Sadly the lack of care in photos, the fact that they have the entire skeleton but cannot determine gender from pelvis or skull is weird. The string is the to the rest of the earring, as in the webbing of of the dream catcher as it looks like a chunk of the outside broke but the strings are usually durable so it stays mostly intact imho...Thanks, so we can "skip" Mr. Martin. I think today is "confusion day" for me. Why on earth would they call it a necklace if it's an earring....also what is the string like thing on the dream catcher....that is what makes me think it was worn like a necklace??
I doubt many policemen have the time to be craft jewelers, or understand the size. Sadly the lack of care in photos, the fact that they have the entire skeleton but cannot determine gender from pelvis or skull is weird. The string is the to the rest of the earring, as in the webbing of of the dream catcher as it looks like a chunk of the outside broke but the strings are usually durable so it stays mostly intact imho...
I do all my measurements for jewelry in metric so I knew it was tiny... if you don’t use it... well you don’t have a feel for it. That is all.
I'm sure this article from the Chicago Tribune OCT 29 1974 is unrelated but this building had a horrible event.
Djeez....it feels like this place is haunted.