C/P from the bottom of page 3 "1 Mr. Christensen may present the testimony of Dr. Peggy Pearson, M.D., a psychiatrist employed by the University of Illinois McKinley Health Center, who provided treatment to Mr. Christensen in the months preceding his arrest. However, Dr. Pearson’s testimony and records are similarly not subject to the notice requirements of Rule 12.2, although once again the government has been in possession of Dr. Pearson’s records for months. Nor do they trigger a request from the government to evaluate Mr. Christensen. Dr. Pearson’s treatment of Mr. Christensen occurred prior to the commencement of this proceeding; it was in no way conducted for the purpose of this or any other litigation; and she had no further contact with Mr. Christensen following his arrest. Mr. Christensen himself is limited to presenting the contents of Dr. Pearson’s records for, due to the passage of time, she has no independent recollection of Mr. Christensen; accordingly, the government should only be permitted to rebut them in the same manner, through use of the records on cross-examination." She has no independent recollection of him. ????? I don't believe that. She would have notes to remind herself and would surely have recognised him. This was a big, big , deal and I thought the change of venue was because people in C-U couldn't forget him.