On Time Out
- Jun 27, 2019
- Reaction score
I don't believe he has a record, does he? Everything I've read in MSM says nothing about a prior record and when I looked for his records nothing seemed to pop up. Old records don't always appear and I believe there were some sealed records so very possible I missed something.
Careful redaction is an option frequently used for that purpose. So withholding an entire AA or other public document on those grounds alone is specious.possible that charging documents mention minors or other witnesses whose identities are currently not disclosed for their safety?
true, but wasn’t the video released very quickly after the murder? I would think I would recognize my spouse in something he wore last week, especially the hat!The video of BG looked like every moderately overweight 25-60 y/o white guy in rural America IMO. And his clothes? Same story there. It wasn't like he was dressed in a bedazzled purple suit jacket. Pretty standard clothes.
An inheritance? Common for people to pay off a mortgage when they receive an inheritance from a relative.RA & his wife paid off a 2nd mortgage on their house in 2013 about two years after it was issued. How did they find that much cash in a short time?
Info posted earlier in thread
The public and the news media are allowed at the Rhoden murder trial. Some witnesses are allowed to opt out of being recorded for tv, but reporters are there, as is the public.There is always another monster, unfortunately
Seems it is becoming more common, just look at the Rhoden murder trials
It seems likely to be that she hadn't seen what he was wearing that day. Say she woke up and went to work early and he had the day off, he would've had to have gotten dressed while she was gone.true, but wasn’t the video released very quickly after the murder? I would think I would recognize my spouse in something he wore last week, especially the hat!
Either I'm extremely tired or I've lost track of my amendments, either is possible. Do you think LE conducted an illegal search? Sorry, I'm just confused.Right? Don't called a press conference to announce you plan to violate the 4th amendment unless you want to fight MSM. The public's right to know is limited but the government's right to withhold is not unlimited.
Good test case weighing those rights. We are seeing more & more of this unconstitutional withholding of docs from the public.
It's always been wrong and it always will be in our open society. If sunlight does not prevail, injustice can go undetected forever.
My opinion only.
The only cases that show up in Indiana are two speeding tickets and a failure to wear a seat belt, all over ten years ago.