but this is stuff you are supposed to do BEFORE you arrest someone. They've arrested him they should have to show at least probable cause to have arrested him. I think he is probably guilty, but if his rights are not protected and transparency not give to the process in his case how can you or I expect it if we are falsely accused? And to be clear we do not need public access to the whole case file or any gory details or anything, just the PCA which should have been write KNOWing It would be public.Perhaps dissenting opinion, warning. Active investigation. Our desire, including mine, and media, and all other public, to know more, does NOT trump risking them not ensuring a solid prosecution. JMO, very strongly IMO. Wth would they risk that? Patience is required by all of us imo. Don't rush with wanting every single piece before it's time imo. Let them get it right, dotted is, crossed ts. As noted above , not like we saw, so far, recently in Colorado with poor missing (murdered imo) Suzanne.