For sure. I was only pointing out that it wasn’t just his ex who thought it could have been him on the bridge. Others called LE as well. Regarding whether they knew him or not I don’t know. I’m not asserting that the warrant makes him guilty. I’m saying only that the police appear to have had a case against him and were allowed a search warrant. If they’d found what they were after then I imagine they’d have collared him.Nothing to say all the 15 who submitted tips knew him personally, in fact I‘d strongly lean towards they did not. SM including early threads here were numerous members who were beyond certain that the photo of the man on the bridge was of him, especially after he was interviewed by TV reporters in a blue coat similar to the man in the photo that was already released.
Any search warrant always includes details in the most favourable and even somewhat biased slant by LE because the purpose of that information is so the Judge will approve it. It’s not to be interpreted as evidence of guilt in itself, it’s to legally allow LE to search. And 15 opinions from different people raising concerns does not prove guilt.