Looking ahead to proper hearings, if we get that far, I'll be interested to what extent the defence intends to make use of alternative suspects as the 'real killer'
We don't know what evidence links RA to the murders, but I suppose hypothetically, catfish guy could generate some reasonable doubt.
I wonder if the nature of charges more reflects the difficulty of ruling out catfish guy i.e at trial the prosecution might find themselves struggling to prove catfish guy was not involved - hence their case being directed towards proving RA was certainly involved in abduction, regardless of whether anyone else was involved?
02c