Quick question ... would it really compromise the conviction process much if the public were given access to more of what was recorded by phone?
I go back on forth on what else can possibly be recorded of him that
wouldn't help to distribute among the public in hopes of more tips. Could he possibly have only said, "down the hill?" and that's all of him that's recorded?
Re: speculation above that he says their name, again I ask, why not release that recording if they had it?
In my opinion, if he did know their names, they obviously didn't recognize
him as they never referred to him as a known or recognized individual (
source)