As the mother of a murdered child, I think I may have a different point of view?
I fully believe the case is
stalled, not cold. I just haven't (quite) joined the ranks of this being a cold case. Here's why:
- A cold case is an unsolved criminal investigation which remains open pending the discovery of new evidence. (Meaning they are no longer receiving tips, and have investigated every possible piece of evidence collected without the ability to move forward, make an arrest, or solve the case).
- I don't believe investigators are no longer receiving tips. I believe they have not received the tip needed to make an arrest. The one that places their POI(s) at the crime scene.
- IMO, Investigators have a very short list of suspects (possibly with only one or two names).
- There (again, IMO) are many things going on behind the scene that we, the public, are unaware of.
- I would not be surprised if there is yet another group of specialists/professionals going back to the beginning and reviewing both the criminal investigation (i.e.; crime scene, the contents of Libby's phone, photo/video enhancements, early witness interviews, DNA collected both at the crime scene, and from individuals who provided a sample, etc.), and the large number of tips.
- Despite the back-and-forth statements regarding DNA, I believe there was some found at the scene. And, I believe this DNA belongs to BG. My best guess (at this point), is that this DNA can be explained away for some reason.
- Investigators working on the case have contacted numerous high-profile specialists that have indicated this case can be solved. It will just be an uphill battle. (Thus the reason that after three years the case remains "unsolved").
- Someone knows who did this. They, for whatever reason (fear, uncertainty, the possibility of being arrested for withholding information), have not contacted authorities.
This may be an unpopular opinion, but I still have hope the case is being worked on a daily basis, that there
will be an arrest, the case will prosecuted, and the person(s) responsible will be held accountable.
First of all,
@JDough, I feel incredible compassion when I read your story. I am posting it with tears in my eyes, because it is so sad, scary and unfair. Kids should outlive the parents, and it is incredibly sad when the child is taken away by illness, or by suicide, or by overdose (I have friends among these three groups of parents), but when someone's life is taken away by murder, it is also so incredibly, darn, mean.
My personal reason for joining this forum was the disappearance of a lady I vaguely knew. But with her mom's death, one feels that someone has to keep on caring. That case is truly cold so far, I just hope that somehow, one day, the chips will fall into their places. So our small community around A@L's case, I think, serves the same purpose , to remind people of our states about this case, not to let it sink into the nothingness, until one day...
About the family who might know and is keeping silent. I think the reason might be more mundane. If it is a wife/GF/mother of the perp's (BG's) children, there is a chance she might speak. (There is some danger in living with a murderer). But if the family is well off, I would not be surprised if the fear is more mundane. If BG is working, the family is afraid that they may lose health insurance in case of an arrest, and if the family is well off, they are afraid of losing family money in civil lawsuit.
If these are parents, the situation is more complicated, and I don't know what to say to them. Perhaps, "he is not the child you knew".
But if the holder of information is the spouse, then, think - she is probably in semi-denial. If she speaks out, she risks public wrath. And then, the financial part.
In the place of LE, i'd think of securing stability for her if she agrees to testify. Having BG for a hubby is her misfortune, too, and no need to punish her, or BG's kids.
MOO.