- Jul 21, 2016
- Reaction score
If her sources are accurate, then the 2020 KAK interview seems all the more significant, imo. She said she was told KAK was not the killer, but he knows who it was, AND that LE truly believes there was more than one person using the a_shots account. This is inline with what we read in the transcripts.
Shortly before the Dec. 2021 a_shots release, there was a LE presence at the Peru home, where the dog was reportedly removed. While we don't know what initiated that presence, or the dog's removal, there are not any animal neglect-type charges filed for the resident of that home, TK. We also don't know if the dog was returned. For unknown reasons, this LE presence has not been discussed anywhere in the media but the initial source, which I believe was a FOX news interview with neighbors. I can't find the link. Maybe related, maybe not.
I know a lot of people think the lack of an arrest proves that LE doesn't have a suspect, or that LE lied their way through the 2020 KAK interview, or that LE made big blunders which left KAK a free man for almost 3 years after admitted CSAM activity. Those are not unreasonable assumptions. But personally, I feel like LE does have a suspect, it's all laid out in the 2020 KAK interview, and that the sheer mass of complex digital evidence uncovered through the CSAM investigation is what has taken so much time. I might be in complete fantasy world with these thoughts, but I think the CSAM aspect is what brings more people into the situation than just BG, which complicates matters. JMO.
I believe you are referencing the previous episode with the journalist, which I also listened to and was *very* good. Today’s episode was with an internet investigator that they have come to know, and he stated that there are still unaccounted for device(s) that pinged or something.