OMG. It has just really, really, really just hit me that this guy could still be out there. I am CHILLED. DN really might not be BG. (Yes, my reactions are sometimes delayed, you guys saw this in my lack of excitement about DN initially...).
*FTR: Moo, jmo, I have not fully "excluded" DN as a POI until I get the sense from LE that they are "no longer looking at him" only because they "just can't prove it". Hope this makes sense. I realize the recent statements have been obviously pointing away from DN, (or as far as what they want us to believe, see the term "ruse", they are allowed, NOT saying this is the case). I really just want an off-record statement to ponder, like "Do you thiiiiiiiink it cooooould be him in any way still...what has been revealed in your investigation about him, your interviews, your voice analysis...so, they can't "include or exclude" obviously via the DNA they have collected moo, but what about the other things learned while investigating him? What about the doc's appt...etc, etc.
(Sorry if not a clear post, sleepy...)
Eta: I'm curious as to his demeanor in the interviews, the answers he gave...I watch a lot of interrogation shows on ID, etc...sometimes they're good liars, sometimes they are not...it's usually pretty easy to tell in the interrogation room by what they say and the way they say it before they lawyer up, moo (not always, of course).