IN - Abigail Williams & Liberty German, Delphi, Media, Maps, Timelines NO DISCUSSION

Status
Not open for further replies.
Initial/Acronym Guide for Abby Williams and Liberty German Discussions

Abbreviations for Victims/Location
AW-
Abby Williams
LG- Liberty German
MHB- Monon High Bridge- location of murders
RL- Ron Logan/Property owner where Girls were found
FSG- Flannel Shirt Guy (whom Derrick spoke with when attempting to find Girls on 02/13/17)
BG- The Suspect

Abbreviations for Family Members
AW
- Anna Williams/Abby's Mother
DG- Derrick German/Libby's Father
CT- Carrie Timmons/Libby's Mother
KG- Kelsi German/Libby's Sister
MP- Mike Patty/Libby's Grandfather
BP- Becky Patty/Libby's Grandmother
CP- Cody Patty/Libby's Uncle by adoption
TG- Tara German/Libby's Aunt (Works for BP)

Law Enforcement (LE)/City Officials
CC
- Carrol County
ISP- Indiana State Police
CCS- Carrol County Sheriff's Office
FBI- Federal Bureau of Investigation
DC- Doug Carter/ISP Superintendent
TL- Tobe Leazenby/Carrol County Sherriff
JH- Jerry Holeman/ISP Lead Investigator
KR- Kim Riley/CC Spokesman Sheriff's Office
RI- Robert Ives/Former CC Prosecuter
NM- Nicholas McLeland/Current CC Prosecutor
SE- Shane Evans/Delphi Mayor

Legal Terms
POI
- Person of Interest
MO- Modus Operandi
RSO- Registered Sex Offender
TOD- Time of Death
COD- Cause of Death
SK- Serial Killer

Approved YouTube Channels
GH
- Gray Hughes (Numerous family interviews, crime animation, and maps)
YouTube
SR- Scott Reisch / Crime Talk (Newly Added)
Crime Talk
JR- James Renner (Numerous family interviews and articles pertaining to the Delphi murders)
JamesRenner

Approved Podcasts
DTH
- Down The Hill (HLN)
https://www.downthehillpodcast.com
Scene of the Crime- Kelsi German
Scene of the Crime: Delphi
*Please note: You must scroll to the bottom of the page for first episode, and work your way up.

MSM- Main Stream Media
Any reputable television station, newspaper, Twitter Account, official news and information portal for Abby and Libby (Abby and Libby.org – Abigail Williams & Liberty German News / Information), and any official FB (Facebook) account for reputable MSM, (LE/FBI, local news station or newspaper pages, etc.). *Please note that this does not include information obtained on social media from unauthorized groups, victim/family accounts, rumors, etc.
 
Sometimes it’s confusing for people to differentiate between a criminals signature versus the criminals modus operandi (MO) when they commit a specific crime. Are they the same? No, they are distinctly different because one feeds on emotional needs, while the other is a procedure. Modus operandi is the method that is used to commit the crime and signature behavior is what helps to serve the criminal’s emotional and psychological needs.

Offender’s Signature vs. Modus Operandi
 
(I will be copying my notes and partial transcriptions of the podcasts, Scene of the Crime: Delphi and Down the Hill: Delphi, that I originally posted in the General Discussion thread >>> Found Deceased - IN - Abigail (Abby) Williams, 13, & Liberty (Libby) German, 14, The Delphi Murders 13 Feb 2017 #124.)

<modedit: For links to the Scene of the Crime and the Down the Hill podcasts, please see post 914 in this thread>

Scene of the Crime: Delphi — Abby and Libby
Episode 1

- LG and her sister Kelsie had checked two geocaching spots on the trails a few weeks earlier

- trail system has over 8 miles of wide and flat wooded trails and 2 miles of narrower paved trails (for biking, etc.)

- Monon High Bridge is 63 feet off the ground and 854 feet long

- the bridge is often used as a backdrop for engagement and senior photos (despite not being structurally sound or safe for pedestrians)

- Kelsie said she and LG had been to the bridge many times to take photos

- Anna (AW’s mom) said Abby had never been on the bridge but had been out to the trails with her many times before

- KG said she thinks it was around 1:38-1:39 pm when she dropped the girls off

- KG said the trail system is a popular teenage hangout and “what people in Delphi did on nice days”

- KG said she usually sees people she knows there and rarely saw anyone she didn’t know; she also knew people her age who had been on the trails earlier in the day on 2/17
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Scene of the Crime: Delphi — Missing
Episode 2

3:00-3:30 pm - the time Libby and Derrick (Libby's dad) had planned to meet at the drop off spot

3:11 pm - Derrick calls LG as he approaches the trail system
The call rings several times before going to voicemail.

3:13 pm - Derrick calls LG again and also sends her a text message (2nd call)

Unable to reach Libby, Derrick exits the car and walks a few yards down the path until it separates into 3 separate trails:

1- High Bridge / 501 Trail
2- Deer Creek / 505 Trail (goes down hill)
3- Freedom Bridge / 501 Trail (goes away from High Bridge)

Derrick sees an older man in a flannel shirt coming from the High Bridge Trail and asks if he’s seen the girls that way. The man says he's only seen a man and woman down under the bridge. D decides to head down the 505 Trail but doesn't see the girls. He turns around and returns to the trailhead area.

3:24 pm - Derrick calls LG (3rd call)
3:32 pm - Derrick calls LG (4th call)

3:33 pm - Derrick calls his mother and LG's grandmother/guardian Becky and relays that he can't find the girls and Libby isn't answering her phone; he then calls his sister/LG’s Aunt Tara and leaves a message asking if she’s heard from the girls

Derrick then walks toward the Freedom Bridge Trail and runs into Flannel Shirt guy again. The man says he still hasn't seen the girls.

3:57 pm - Derrick heads back to his car and calls LG (5th call)
3:58 pm - Derrick calls Becky again

4:12 pm - Becky calls Kelsi at her boyfriend/Chase's house to see if she’s heard from LG; she hasn't and heads to the trail to help look for the girls

4:17 pm - Becky calls LG and then a few of their friends to see if they’ve heard from Libby or Abby

A short time later, Becky and Aunt Tara speak on the phone and decide to meet at the trailhead. When Tara arrives, Derrick gets into her car to wait for Becky.

4:20 pm - Becky calls her husband/LG’s grandfather Mike at work in Lafayette and lets him know they can't find the girls

Before Becky leaves the house, her son/LG’s Uncle Cody comes in from work and rides with her to the trails. They take two different routes the girls could've taken (if they’d walked home), but there's no sign of them.

The primary concern among family members at this time is that the girls have been in an accident - maybe they've fallen down a hill and Libby dropped her phone. (Abby didn't have a phone.)

Becky calls AT&T to ask about pinging LG’s phone but they can't help her. (Libby’s family had run a factory reset on LG’s phone a week earlier to fix glitches she'd been having with her service, and tracking apps like Life360 and/or Find My Phone had not been set back up.)

Kelsi and her Uncle Cody take the Monon High Bridge Trail and walk the 1/2 mile to the bridge, cross it, and proceed down the hill on the other end. At the end of the bridge, Kelsi remembers looking to the left and seeing where someone had fallen down the hill, but she didn’t think anything of it... “because everybody goes down the hill”. Doug Carter asks Kelsi if she'd seen “disrupted ground” and was that why she thought someone had fallen down the hill. She says yes.

At the bottom of the steep hill is a long dirt road (private driveway) that connects several residences. Cody and Kelsi knock on the doors of some of the remote homes but only manage to speak to one homeowner who had not seen the girls.

Cody and Kelsi climb back up the hill to the bridge and return to the parking area. Kelsi says they didn't continue to walk down the left hand side of the bridge’s end because there were no residences or structures in that immediate area - just woods and Deer Creek.

5:00 pm - Libby’s grandfather Mike arrives and parks in the Mears family driveway with Mr. Mears permission (he also joins Mike on the search)

Mike tries to call LG repeatedly but her phone is now going straight to voicemail. (The calls were ringing several times before going to voicemail at 4:17 pm but were going straight to voicemail by 5:00 pm.)

5:20 pm - Mike calls the Delphi Police Department and reports the girls missing

2 officers respond to Mike’s 9-1-1 call -- one officer with the Delphi PD and an officer with the Carroll County Sheriff’s Office both meet Mike at the trailhead and begin to search for the girls immediately.

Kelsi heads to work nearly an hour late for her 4:30 pm shift.

Becky tries calling Anna (Abby’s mom) several times to let her know the girls are missing. Unable to reach Anna, Becky heads over to the restaurant where Anna is working but she phones her back on the way there. After learning her daughter is missing, Anna leaves work and heads to meet Mike and Patty at the sheriff’s department to file a police report.

Mike calls a friend in LE to see about pinging LG’s phone. He recommends Mike talk with the sheriff’s office about tracking down her phone. Mike leaves to meet Becky and Kelsi at the sheriff’s office. (Kelsi had been contacted to meet with LE, as she was the last person to see the girls. Her friend (who is also her boyfriend’s sister) Bree goes with her to the sheriff's office.

Mike stops by the house and grabs an iPad and other electronic devices for LE. He also calls a cousin who works for a local TV station. The cousin comes down to the trails and the story airs on the local 6 o'clock news.

Mike also calls up his fire department buddies to help w/ the search. Meanwhile, the family posts about the girls missing on FB and emergency officials from multiple agencies -- including the Carroll County Sheriff’s Office, Delphi PD, Delphi FD, and the Department of Natural Resources -- join the search. Emergency fire tones go off between 5:50-6:00 pm and secondary calls go out to the volunteer fire department. A few of the searchers estimate that as many as 100 people were out searching for the girls that night.

Libby was an avid social media user, and when Kelsi checks Snapchat, she sees the story LG posted that included 2 photos. One photo depicts the bridge and the other depicts Abby walking on the bridge. The Snapchat story was posted around 2:07 pm. The photo of Abby was taken by Libby, who was positioned ahead of her on the bridge about 40% of the way down—headed toward the point where it dead ends into the woods.

LE begins pinging LG’s phone that evening. It pinged around town that afternoon but stopped 4-5 hours earlier. All texts from family members go unread.

LE immediately looks into the girls social media accounts. Anna then discovers Abby has a male friend online that she doesn't know. She didn’t even know that Abby had a FB account because Abby had blocked her, as she'd been forbidden from having an account. The only electronic device Abby had was a Kindle Fire tablet. She got the tablet two months earlier on Christmas, and Anna didn’t know the password. Despite all of this, LE is fairly certain the girls hadn't planned to meet anyone on the trails that day and they didn’t find anything suspicious on SM or on any of the electronics.

After the family meets with LE at the sheriff’s office, they return to the trails to rejoin the search. Interviews with Becky, Mike, and Anna are aired on the 11 o’clock news.

Just before midnight, the Carroll County Sheriff’s Office issues a news release saying they have no reason to believe the girls are in immediate danger or that foul play is suspected. The official search is terminated around midnight due to the darkness. However, some stay throughout the night and search the woods with flashlights. These include the Delphi Fire Department, Mike Patty, Eric Erskine (Abby’s grandfather), and several others.


The next morning...

7:00 am - Kelsi, Mike, Patty, Anna, and others reconvene at the fire department

7:40 am - searchers are grouped into small search parties of 10-20 people and sent out to check separate areas within a 20-25 square mile radius

Volunteer searchers are told to stay away from the immediate area at the end of the bridge (as they suspect the girls may have gone that way) because K9 search dogs are being brought in to search the area and they don't want to contaminate it.

Only two groups of searchers cross the bridge to look for the girls on the property at the southeastern end. A lot of the searchers are looking in town and in fields. Kelsi, Derrick, Mrs. Bennett (the secretary of Delphi Middle), and Kelsi’s cousin are searching together in one group. Dive teams are deployed in the deeper parts of Deer Creek, a drone is sent up to look overhead, and the state police provide their search helicopter.

Anna remains at the fire station to wait for her father Cliff to arrive from Michigan. She also goes back to her house to grab a piece of Abby’s clothes for tracking her scent.

Kelsi’s group goes searching under the bridge, and Kelsi brings a blanket and granola bars with her. Another search group nearby is searching across the private driveway, near Deer Creek.

When Kelsi’s group starts back towards the driveway, a man yells up that he's found a shoe close to the edge of the creek. He yells up to ask Kelsi what kind of shoes the girls were wearing. The shoe was a black Nike sneaker and belongs to Libby. Other items belonging to the girls are also found by searchers, but that information has not been released publicly.

Police recordings tell us that a deputy searching the banks of Deer Creek, under the bridge, found girls clothing (specifically undergarments) in the shallow water. A photographer from a local newspaper posted photos of the search activity on FB. She commented that the clothing in the creek could even be seen from 75 yards away.

LE also finds and bags a cigarette butt they deem relatively fresh. It was found on the edge of Deer Creek or in the water — it’s unclear which.

A short time later, the same searcher who found the shoe, spots something out of the corner of his eye down the left side of the bridge — it was movement across the creek. Looking with his phone camera, he zooms in on the area and sees two deer standing in the woods. When he pans down with his phone camera, he finds the two bodies at approximately 12:15 pm. Kelsi commented that if the deer hadn’t moved, he never would have seen them.
 
Scene of the Crime: Delphi — Unthinkable
Episode 3

February 14, 2017
By 1:00 pm, the search and rescue operation for Libby and Abby had become an evidence recovery operation. Crime scene tape went up at the end of the Monon High Bridge. It roped down the left hand side of the hill (at the bridge’s southeast end), as well as a large surrounding area.

Superintendent Doug Carter said the investigation began immediately. When he arrived on scene two hours after the girls were found, the crime scene had already been completely sealed. LE and other emergency vehicles were parked along County Road 300 North and the Morning Heights Cemetery, which sits between that road and the wooded area to the north of Deer Creek. The FBI also arrived within hours of the bodies being found, and Kelsi was questioned by an FBI agent that first day. A special FBI recovery team worked 24-hours every day for the next few days to collect evidence. Indiana Crime Scene techs also worked the scene, and divers were brought in to explore Deer Creek.

Former Carroll County prosecutor, Robert Ives, visited the scene in anticipation of a future criminal prosecution.

Robert Ives: “There is a lot of crime scene evidence, and some of it is somewhat odd. But when I say that, any murder scene tends to have odd facts about it. I mean… in real life, obviously, people don’t kill people really all that often, and this crime scene… there’s a lot of evidence. There’s a lot of unique facts there. And, honestly, I’m shocked. And, I promise you, the police are shocked. That it wasn’t solved in a day or two. This crime scene was physically strange, but that’s for the state police to determine… to decide… what to release and what not to release. I’ve said that before, it’s very odd.”

Tuesday, February 14, 2017 @ 1:50 pm
A joint press conference is held with Kim Riley (Indiana State Police Public Information Officer), Tobe Leazenby (Carroll County Sheriff), and Steve Mullins (Delphi Police Chief)

LE confirms that two bodies had been found but release limited information otherwise. They didn’t ID the two bodies at the time but confirmed that search efforts for the girls had been scaled back. The bodies were located about a half-mile upstream, east from the MHB area. The area was not specified, exactly, but LE said it was about 50 feet away from the edge of Deer Creek.

Sgt. Kim Riley: “We have found two bodies Uh, is that the Sugar Creek? Deer Creek. Deer Creek, sorry. In Deer Creek, about a mile east of town. Um, we are investigating this as a crime scene. Uh, we suspect foul play.”

When a reporter asked why foul play was suspected, Riley says, Just by the way the bodies were found. That’s about all I can say at this point and time.”

A vigil was held at a church that evening, and more than 700 community members attended.

Mike Patty and others continued to conduct organized grid searches over the next few days, by walking the miles around the area and looking for any clues that could tell them what happened.

Wednesday, February 15, 2017 @ 12 pm
A press conference was held by Sgt. Kim Riley and Sheriff Tobe Leazenby confirming that the two bodies found were Libby and Abby.

Sgt. Riley: “Yesterday I made a remark that they were near the water. It was about 50 feet off the shoreline. So, I was off on that. I hadn’t been to the scene yet. I was going with information I’d received. So, they were about… I, I was looking from a distance, but I’m going to say it was between 50-60 feet off the shoreline. This is considered a double homicide investigation. The toxicology reports are yet to come, and that takes anywhere from 4-6 weeks. Uh, the initial, I believe the initial autopsies for the girls are done or just about completed.”

Neither official would comment on the condition of the bodies or the cause of death due to the ongoing investigation. Superintendent Doug Carter responded by saying, “Only the murderer would know.”

Sheriff Leazenby said he didn’t believe there was any threat to the public, but then he somewhat contradicted that by saying the public should remain alert and vigilant.

Sgt. Riley: “We have nobody in custody at this time. Uh, so as far as I’m concerned, yes there is somebody out there that did this horrendous crime. And, we’re going to track them down.”

Sgt. Riley (in another brief solo public appearance later that day): “Again, I’m not going to say one way or the other. People just have to realize that this has occurred. Uh, and be mindful and just watch what’s going on in the world around you. I think people need to be cautious and careful. Uh, parents need to make sure they know where their children are at, what their children are doing. And, if nothing else, know what’s going on in their lives. That’s the most important thing I can say at this point and time.”

Wednesday, February 15, 2017 @ 6:50 pm
Indiana State Police released two nearly identical photos of a man they believed was on the High Bridge trail around the same time as Abby and Libby. They wanted to speak to this person, and asked the public to please contact them if the man was recognized by anyone. They also asked to speak to anyone who was parked at the High Bridge trailhead between 1:00 and 5:00 pm on the 13th. LE didn't yet call the man a suspect and made no disclosure as to the origin of the photos.

LE confirmed they’d received various tips. One of the tips led to a search warrant executed by the state police on the night of February 16th, at a family farm on Bicycle Bridge Road – about 5 miles from the Monon High Bridge. Despite spending two hours at the property and removing various items, no arrests resulted from the search. LE also conducted two searches of the land, home, and vehicle belonging to the man owning the property where Libby and Abby were found.

Thursday, February 16, 2017
LE announced a tip line that had been set up. The Department of Homeland Security provided satellite dishes and other equipment to support the thousands of calls that would come into the line over the next coming days and weeks.

Anna (Abby's mom) tells a story that occurred about a year or so before the girls were killed. She said it wasn’t a big deal at the time but later recalled it, in hindsight, now that a killer seemed to be in their midst.

Anna: “I had one incident at a store. What I remember is making eye contact with somebody when we walked in. And they were sitting in their vehicle, uh, when we left. And, it happened to be that his side was closest to Abby’s. Then she got in the car and he and I spoke for a few seconds. And it was awkward because he said, ‘You look like you know who I am’. And, I was like ‘well, I’ve worked in restaurants and nursing homes here. I know a lot of people by sight but not by name. I apologize.’ And, that was all the conversation was. But, I do recall… I have to say that man kind of made me feel creepy. So, I said, ‘Honey, anytime you come across that, you be sure to pay attention. If you were driving or you were leaving a store, you go back inside the store and you ask somebody to walk you out to your car. You pay attention to that. And, that was probably a year or so before we lost them.”

The man Derrick saw in the flannel shirt out on the trails the day the girls went missing was the President of the Delphi Historic Trails, Dan McCain. He was instrumental in developing the trail system.

Sunday, February 19, 2017
LE announced that the man in the photos was the prime suspect in the murders, but the photographer was still not made known to the public at this time.

As stated on the FBI’s website, the photo appears to depict :
  • a white male wearing blue jeans, a blue coat or jacket, and a hoodie
  • a man walking on the Monon High Bridge; the tree distantly visible behind him in the photos places him on the bridge – walking from the metal barricaded northwestern end toward the southeastern dead end, somewhere around 60 feet away from the end of the bridge
  • the man is looking down and his hands are not visible; they appear to be in his pockets
  • his left hand appears to be in the left pocket of his jeans and his right hand appears to be higher up, possibly in the right pocket of his jacket
  • his jeans are baggy and faded
  • the navy zip-up jacket over his hoodie, appears to be of a light weight canvas material
  • a brown expanse also appears to be around his waist (it could just be the bottom of his hoodie, which seems brown in color, but some believe he is wearing a fanny pack, tool belt, or deer kit)
  • there is also strenuous debate about whether the man is wearing a hat, has his hood up, both or neither
  • non-descript bulky, black shoes or boots complete his wardrobe
LE has not addressed what leads them to believe this man is their suspect.

February 22, 2017
A major joint press conference was held by the Indiana State Police, the Carroll County Sheriff’s Office, the Delphi PD, and the FBI. LE emphasized that the tools being used in this investigation were unprecedented. Indiana State Police Sgt. Tony Slocum reiterated that the man in the photo is the suspect in the killings of Abby and Libby. A visibly upset Doug Carter of the Indiana State Police then spoke.

Doug Carter:
“Why Libby?
Why Abby?
Why Delphi?
Why Carroll County?
Why the region?
Why the state?
Why, even, the nation?"


"I say that because this is a classic example, and a clear example, that evil lives amongst us.”

“The poster in front of you – someone knows who this individual is. Someone knows who this individual is.”

“Is it a family member?
Is it a neighbor?
Is it an acquaintance?
Is it an associate?
Or maybe that one guy that lives over at that one place that’s just kinda not right.”


“Maybe it’s his jeans.
Maybe it’s his jacket or his sweatshirt.
Maybe it’s his shirttail.
Maybe it’s his posture.
Maybe it’s the right hand in his pocket.”


“You see, even with technology, we need human intelligence. In other words, we need you. I’m not suggesting that science – that everything we can do with science has been done – because we are just getting started.”

“Please do not rationalize tips away. Rationalize what you think might not be important away… by thinking he would never do that to another human being. Or think what I know doesn’t matter. Let folks like the people standing behind me, with such incredible passion, and commitment, and dedication to this profession make that determination.”

“Tips are anonymous.
Some might not want to talk about it because they don’t want to get involved.
Because they know the individual.
Again, he may be a family member… probably has family.
No one will ever know.
No one will ever know."


"There’s not an agency on the planet better at helping us to facilitate this than the FBI, and they’re just as entrenched in this as anybody.
No one will know.”


“As poor as this picture is, somebody knows.
And if you’re watching, we’ll find you.”


Greg Massa (Assistant Special Agent w/ the FBI) emphasized the FBI’s commitment to the case. He said an FBI agent in Indianapolis had been present during the initial searches for the girls, and that since they were found, the FBI had been standing shoulder-to-shoulder with local LE. While the chief investigators in this case would remain the Carroll County Sheriff’s Office, assisted by the Indiana State Police, agent Massa said 20 FBI agents were in Delphi assisting on the case on any given day. Even FBI Director, James Comey, had been briefed twice on the developments in the case. He then provided a very general profile of the behavior likely exhibited by the suspect after the killings, which will be discussed in greater detail in another episode.

Cpt. Dave Burston (Chief Public Information Officer for the ISP) then dropped a bombshell:
Libby’s cellphone had provided authorities with usable data – audio from the video found on the cellphone that Libby had on her that day. That audio file captured the voice of the man who killed her and Abby. He then confirmed that the image previously released was not a photo – but a video still – extracted from the video footage found on Libby’s phone.

Cpt. Burston: “We do have some new information for you today. Uh, it’s in the form of an audio file. Uh, from the cell phone that Liberty German had with her at the time. We’re not going to play everything that we have. Uh, but Liberty had the presence of mind, uh, to turn on her video camera. We are going to share this audio clip with you momentarily with the hope that someone will recognize this voice. And, I want to be very clear that what you’re about to hear is just four short words. Excuse me, three words – down the hill.”

Sgt. Tony Slocum later clarified that investigators decided to release the audio clip because they believe his voice is distinctive enough that someone will recognize it. Sgt. Slocum said that what he hears is exasperation. “It sounds like he’s a little exasperated, like he told them before to do it.”

After Cpt. Burston finished his remarks, Sgt. Slocum announced that a reward fund had been established for information leading to the arrest of the killer, or killers, of Libby and Abby. At the time of the press conference, the reward already amounted to $41,000. The money had been donated by local businesses and the FBI. When the press conference concluded, officials responded to a few questions from reporters and revealed additional information about the case.

Cpt. Burston said that as far as the suspect goes, nothing was considered off the table with regard to whether he was local or not. Or, whether this was a crime of opportunity perpetrated by a stranger. Or, if this was someone who knew the girls were going to be there that day. He couldn’t confirm that the audio from the video belonged to the man in the photos. And, he said LE had not ruled out the possibility that more than one killer was involved.

Anna (Abby’s mom) was too angry and upset to attend the press conference. She said that she was so afraid she might recognize the voice on the audio, so she waited until her boyfriend got home from work to listen to it. When she didn’t recognize the voice, she was equally afraid to know that she didn’t know who this person was at all.
 
Scene of the Crime: Delphi — Evidence
Episode 4

Within in a week of discovering the bodies of Libby and Abby, 25 different agencies on the local, state, and federal level were working on this case.

Superintendent Doug Carter: “We also reached out to a lot of other agencies in Indiana where we have tips. So, just from the police perspective, we had detectives here from every one of our posts from around Indiana. We have 14 of them. So, over a hundred and fifty people within the ISP have touched this in some way or another.”

March 2017
The Delphi Command Center moved to a larger space to accommodate the larger number of personnel working on the case.

On any given day, there were approximately 20 FBI agents – in addition to 30 other LE officers – working 20 hours a day on the investigation. The FBI had taken over the tip lines in late February and moved the call center to Washington. However, they continued to funnel tips that were deemed important to investigators on the ground in Delphi via satellite trucks stationed outside the local command center.

February 23, 2017 (one month after the murders)
LE had processed 3,900 tips; 1,900 of those came in after the “down the hill” audio clip was released.

By the end of April –

16,000 tips had been reported and more than 500 people had been investigated by the ISP as a result.

The FBI created a “Seeking Information” poster that was distributed nationally. They also generated a nationwide billboard campaign and utilized 6,000 billboards in 46 states. The billboards displayed the still images of the suspect, photos of Abby and Libby, basic information about the case, and the tip line phone number. Interestingly, the billboards stated that BG was last seen at 2:30 pm on February 13th, 2017.

Paul Holes – the DNA expert that identified the Golden State Killer – spoke with SOC about the evidence process.
“Any time I have a case, it’s likely that there is no known relationship between the victim and the offender. I’m looking for that physical evidence that could actually identify the offender. That is really limited to two forms of physical evidence. Uh, in terms of the forensics sense. And that’s DNA and fingerprints. And so, now it’s really looking at what is present within the crime scene. Whether it be at the crime scene, objects in the crime scene, evidence collected from the victim’s clothing or the victim’s bodies that might be able to give me that critical DNA evidence. Or that critical fingerprint evidence to give me a name. Uh, that is so important. And so that’s, that’s where the focus in these types of cases has to be.”

The ISP began stopping drivers in the area within hours of the bodies being located, and they were asked if they’d seen anything suspicious or unusual. According to Sgt. Jerry Holeman of the ISP – the lead investigator for that agency – officers spoke to as many as 600 people in this canvas.

Sgt. Kim Riley said, “They were trying to get people driving down the Hoosier Heartland who had been on the interstate. That were in Logansport, that might’ve saw somebody walking, hitchhiking. If they saw a duffle bag laying somewhere, anything. We were just reaching out for people that saw anything within that distance.”

Investigators also tracked down people who were on the MHB trail that day to seek out information and went door-to-door at the residences located near the bridge to determine if homeowners had seen anything on the 13th.

Local registered sex offenders living in Delphi as of 2019 – of which there were 12 – and the many others living in surrounding counties were rounded up, questioned about their alibi, and polygraphed in some cases. More than 20 people who were contacted by LE in connection to this case were arrested on unrelated charges.

70 subpoenas and 12 search warrants (that we know of) were executed in the months following the crime. The two executed at Ron Logan’s property, as well as the one on Bicycle Bridge Road about 5 miles away, have already been mentioned. On February 25, another search warrant was executed at a residence on Canal Street in Peru, IN (30 miles away). LE has said the persons at this particular residence are in no way connected to Libby and Abby.

We have no other information about the remainder of those search warrants. They may have been property searches or they may have been issued to obtain video surveillance footage from a local business or residence. They may have also been issued to obtain cell phone records, computers, or other technological information.

Robert Ives told SOC that he personally submitted several subpoenas to obtain all cell phone records from phones within a five mile radius of the trails to determine who was in the area that day. All owners of cell phones that pinged in the area of the bridge were contacted regarding their activities and asked about what they had seen. Investigators paid special attention to phone records of anyone who was new to the area or had spent several hours in the area during the time in question.

LE also tried to determine the suspect’s method of ingress and egress to and from the area. Parameters given by LE indicate they believe the suspect left the area by 5:00 pm but was possibly still in the area when searchers began to look for the girls.

BG only had a few options to avoid being seen and only two of those are likely:
  1. north thru Ron Logan’s property or the cemetery on County Road 300 North
  2. west thru the woods along the north bank of Deer Creek, rejoined the MHB trial before the start of the bridge, and then walked back to Delphi or elsewhere via the Freedom Bridge Trail
These routes are close to the Hoosier Heartland Highway and Interstate 25 (both of which could have provided a quick exit).

It is not known if the suspect had a vehicle or where he parked it if he did. Many believe the most logical place to have left a car was the cemetery abutting Ron Logan’s property. This is within close proximity to the location of the bodies and would have been a somewhat short – if treacherous – hike to the bridge. It was reported that a witness who lived near Ron Logan saw a man leaving the cemetery that day. If the suspect drove to the bridge that day, the evidence was likely destroyed when the many volunteers arrived to help the families search.

Every social media platform used by either of the girls was thoroughly analyzed by LE and every contact was interviewed. These platforms included Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter. Libby was friends with both Kelsie and her grandparents across all platforms.

Kelsie: “We had to be friends with them, so they could see what we were posting. Um, and I’m sure they checked our messages without us knowing because they have our passwords.”

10 days before the murder, Libby reset her iPhone 6 with the help of her Aunt Tara because of glitches in service (like her screen and/or apps kept freezing up).

The video of BG was recorded with the iPhone’s standard camera app, and the audio was extracted from the video. LE has confirmed that additional audio and video exist.

LE has never released the time the video was taken or discussed if the sequence of events were revealed. They’ve even refused to say how much audio and video exist on the phone (in terms of duration).

On an iPhone 6, videos are interrupted by incoming calls and we know that a call was made by Derrick at 3:11 pm. When the video is interrupted, recording stops and the video is saved to the phone but it doesn’t resume recording when the call ends. The recording may have continued until the phone died if a call didn’t come in while recording. We also don’t know if Libby had her ringer turned off/on at the time. Because LE has stated that BG is the killer, something on the video must confirm it. However, we know it wasn’t the crime itself because Sheriff Leazenby said it was not recorded.

The MHB was constructed with six, small wooden platforms sticking off the side in staggered locations -- which are large enough for two people to stand on. Based on the location of BG in the photo, which was determined by the forked tree visible behind him (located approximately 280 feet from the end of the bridge) and the fifth platform seen behind him (located approximately 220 feet from the bridge), we know he was approximately 60 feet away from the end of the bridge when the video was recorded.

Robert Ives: “The image of the suspect is an image from a video from a cell phone camera at great distance.”

It is believed that Libby was standing at the end of the bridge as Abby approached her, and both girls were aware of the suspect drawing closer to them.

Becky, Mike, and Anna were permitted to watch the video and listen to the audio. Anna said she could hear the audio even after she wasn't able to see anything anymore. And the audio portion of “down the hill” sounds somewhat muffled – as if the microphone is covered or blocked. Anna says the images of BG revealed to the public are the absolute best that can be obtained from the video – even after being enhanced by experts at NASA and Disney.

Robert Ives: “People kept asking… ‘well why don’t they enhance that picture… why don’t they enhance the pixels?’ There’s no pixels to enhance. There aren’t very many pixels there. And, so they did a marvelous job at getting the picture up to the quality of image it is. And I know that’s confused people out in the public. Cause there’s no magic that you know. I mean, you have X number of pixels. Those pixels are of a certain color. It may be that you can enhance the image by adding the contrast or reducing the contrast, but you can’t do anything to change the fact that you’ve got X number of pixels making up the picture. And, as such, you only have certain resolution when you’re dealing with a picture like that.”

ISP has revealed that in the part of audio not released to the public, Abby and Libby can be heard engaging in typical girl talk and discussing the man behind them. The family has also stated that the girls can be heard whispering between themselves and wondering where they would possibly go. Anna told one interviewer that Abby said something like, “well… the path ends here, so we can’t go any farther.”

The bodies of Libby and Abby were located about 170 yards from the end of the bridge and 50 feet from the north bank of the creek.

Deer Creek is somewhat of a misnomer as it resembles more of a river than a creek, and it’s as deep as a river in certain areas. While many parts of the creek are too deep for people to traverse comfortably, there’s an area near a bend located toward the northeast of the bridge that has a sandbar and is shallow enough to cross. Many believe the bend is where the girls crossed over the creek and into Ron Logan’s property on the other side and believe they were likely killed where they were found.

Ron Logan said the path taken -- from the bridge to where their bodies were located -- is difficult to navigate. There is rocky steep terrain, a deep ravine, and woods and thickets. Kelsie told SOC that the girls were found in a valley of sorts. It was unthinkable to RL that the girls would voluntarily make that walk. Someone either forced them to take it or the girls ran from someone who overtook them there.

Robert Ives told SOC the wooded area is by no means completely isolated. In fact, one home located on top of the ridge to the northeast of the bridge has an unobstructed view to where the girls bodies were found. Kelsie believes the girls tried to escape by running through the creek.

Kelsie: “She probably ran through the water and it [the shoe] fell off.”

2:07 pm – Snapchat photo posted
3:11 pm – Derrick called Libby’s phone and she didn’t answer

2:20 – 2:30 pm – the video of BG that produced the still images was filmed (estimation determined by StudioMax – a high end 3D application which calculates time based on light, shadows, time of year and geographical location)

If the suspect was on the bridge at 2:30 pm and the phone call from Derrick went unanswered at 3:11 pm, the crime likely occurred during that 40-minute window. The family received confirmation that the girls were killed that day and were no longer alive throughout the night when people were searching for them. In fact, LE believes the suspect left the area well before dark that afternoon. There is no evidence to suggest the girls were taken to another location before being killed on RL’s property, and LE believes the girls were killed where they were found.

LE has never conclusively stated that a full profile of the DNA of the perpetrator exists. However, they have confirmed that some form of DNA from the crime scene has been collected. As Sgt. Jerry Holeman put it, “We are still working on finding all of the DNA that we have there.” On February 23, Sheriff Leazenby told the media that LE has requested DNA evidence to be fast tracked, but he later backtracked and said he hadn’t intended to confirm or deny the evidence of perpetrator DNA.

Despite the vague references about the presence of DNA, many were asked to give DNA samples in the days and weeks following the murders. The families have all given samples of their DNA samples, and Kelsie says she’s given them DNA three separate times. In addition, the Delphi residents spoken to during the course of the investigation were also asked to give voluntary DNA samples.

Robert Ives: "I’m still stunned by it. To think that we had a crime scene, we had bodies within 24 hours of their death. That we had a video recording and audio recording, I would have thought – and I promise you everybody else thought – we’re never gonna have this much evidence. I mean, there’s… as I say, there’s more. That we have all these facts. Some of them, somewhat unusual. And there’s going to be something about these facts that’s gonna point to somebody. I am, I’m shocked… I’m stunned. When I say that, I don’t mean that I think anybody failed. Many, many great police officers have worked their tails off on this, and it’s just… they're just not finding anything. And, there were promising leads at one time or another. Amazing things… but they didn’t lead to anything. You know, they didn’t lead to a person that was even close to chargeable.”

Paul Holes: "You know as I was monitoring the headlines, uh, as this case was coming more and more prominent in the public domain… umm, it just seemed to continue to remain unsolved. I was a little bit surprised, but I’ve seen that with other cases. And, there’s just so much that goes on behind the scenes with these types of cases, these types of investigations. You know it’s hard to jump to, ya know, a foregone conclusion. Oh! We’re just gonna solve this case. Or, they’re just gonna solve this case right out the gate.”

Anna: “The detectives were like… this is not going to take that long. It’s a small town, somebody’s gonna say something and this is all going to be over soon. I mean, we just… the first couple of weeks, that’s what it felt like. Any day now, ya know… and then all of a sudden, a couple of weeks turned into a couple of months.”

Doug Carter (in response to Kelsie asking him if he was surprised that the video and audio didn’t immediately lead to a suspect): “I was… and I was a little disappointed, probably.”

By March 13, LE had worked more than 13,000 tips and cleared 2,000 of these. The reward fund for information about the killer was up to $224,000.

Despite having several persons of interest, the possibility that this crime could fall into the category of the hardest to solve – random crimes of opportunity committed by a stranger – was beginning to become more and more real.
 
Scene of the Crime: Delphi — Suspects
Episode 5

February 22, 2017
FBI Special Agent In-Charge Greg Massa presented a behavioral profile of the killer to help the public identify the suspect if he was among their friends, acquaintances, colleagues, or family – even if they couldn’t recognize him from the still images.

FBI Agent Massa: “Just think if you had an interaction with an individual who, uh, inexplicably canceled that appointment that you had had together. Or, uh, an individual called into work sick, uh and-d-d um, canceled an important appointment or social engagement. And, at the time gave what would have been a plausible explanation. Um, my cell phone broke or I had a flat tire on my car. But in retrospect, that excuse no longer holds water. That—that—that, that may be, that may be important. Likely, so are behavioral indicators that this, uh, individual may have exhibited since that afternoon of May 13th. Did this individual travel unexpectedly? Did they change their appearance? Did they shave their beard? Cut their hair? Change the color of their hair? The superintendent mentioned the clothes that this individual was wearing in the photo. Did they—did they change the way they dress?”

Massa also pointed out several behaviors to watch out for and included:
  • anyone who has a different sleep pattern
  • anyone who started abusing drugs or alcohol when they hadn’t before
  • anyone who has become anxious or irritable
  • anyone who has followed this case
  • anyone who has paid close attention to what the media has releasing (with an abnormal focus and intensity)
  • anyone who has ongoing conversations about where they were on February 13th
Dr. Catherine M. Brown, who is an expert on child abduction murders, spoke with SOC about certain attributes that might be exhibited:

Dr. Brown: “These offenders are much more unstrikingly, white males. They tend to be a little older. Generally speaking, these are committed by white males. They tend to be under employed or not employed. They tend to be a little more transient than the other population.”

July 17, 2017
A news release that included a sketch of the man believed to be involved in the murders of Abby and Libby was published.

The news release stated:

“The person depicted in the composite sketch is described as a white male between 5’6” to 5’10”, weighing 180-220 pounds, reddish-brown hair, eye color unknown. The sketch depicts a hat that may not be accurate. We ask that you focus on the person’s facial features.”

Sketch Facts:
  • the man with a broad face, hooded eyes, and a bulbous nose
  • he's wearing a hoodie under his jacket and a newsboy cap
  • he's a white man with a goatee and mustache
  • it's a composite drawing created with descriptions given by at least two witnesses (possibly more) who saw the man walking on the trails that day; one of the witnesses is believed to be Dan McCain and another witness is believed to be a woman who told LE that she saw the man walking near Delphi around the time the girls were killed – per Sheriff Tobe Leazenby (This woman took months to come forward and was close enough to the man to report that his eyes were not blue in color)
  • it was drawn by an FBI sketch artist
  • it's intended to help clarify the grainy still images of the suspect
  • it depicts the same person seen in the video still images
  • it had been worked on for over a month
  • it was the result of tips and leads pursued by LE over the course of the investigation

Within two days of the sketch release, the ISP had received over 1,000 tips; that number spiked to 6,000 within a month. By July 2017, the ISP had interviewed and investigated over 1,000 persons.

POTENTIAL SUSPECTS
*The podcast mentions the following men by name and refers to them as suspects. However, I will NOT be posting their names (except when directly quoted by law enforcement) to comply with TOS.

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby has said the property owner has “been covered” by the investigators.

#1 - Colorado Springs Hatchet Sex Offender
  • a Colorado native
  • he was arrested on September 25, 2017 for threatening people with a hatchet on a wooded hiking trail in Colorado Springs
  • he's suspected of murdering mountain biker Tim Watkins the same week he was arrested
  • the ISP never explained why they were interested in him but flew to Colorado Springs to interview him after his arrest
  • he was arrested on charges of illegal possession of a firearm, felony menacing, reckless endangerment, assault, criminal mischief, trespassing, and failing to register as a sex offender
  • a warrant was out for his arrest in Indiana for failing to register his address with authorities
  • he had felony convictions in Morgan County, IN for domestic battery and a sexual offense
  • he also had convictions for indecent exposure and drunk driving in South Carolina (these charges were initiated after he was discovered masturbating while peeping into the stall of a women’s restroom)
  • his last known address in Indiana was at a motel in Greenwood in Carroll County in May 2017
  • he was essentially a transient and moved between short-term motel rooms, rental apartments, and tents pitched under bridges and behind buildings (he was living out of a car with his wife and children when he was arrested in Colorado)
  • the ISP were already looking for DN in connection to this case because he’d failed to check in as a sex offender in Carroll County for several months
  • he was working for a construction company in Zionsville, IN when the girls were killed
  • he claims to have an alibi on the day of the murders – he said he went to an ultrasound appointment with his wife
  • his wife has confirmed she had an appointment that day but cannot recall if he accompanied her to it
  • his wife has said they share a car and wouldn't have been able to drive to Delphi because she drove the vehicle to her appointment
  • he didn’t own a blue jacket like the one worn in the picture, according to his wife
  • he has a broad face, reddish-brown hair, a large nose, and hooded eyes
  • he is a white man with a goatee and mustache
The ISP released the following statement:
“We are aware of the arrest of the person in Colorado and are investigating to see if he can be a suspect in the Delphi double murder investigation. Please keep in mind the Indiana State Police has received more than 1,000 photos of persons alleged to be similar in appearance to the composite sketch of the Delphi person of interest. Each and every one of these tips are investigated for any potential connection to our case. We will give the same attention to the person arrested in Colorado, but right now there is nothing that definitively connects this person to our investigation.”

October 3, 2017
The ISP stated they could not “specifically include or exclude Daniel Nations as a suspect in the Delphi homicides”.

Sheriff Leazenby said, “there have been some similarities brought to our attention, but I cannot speak of the details.”

El Paso County Colorado Sheriff Spokesperson said there were many similarities between the cases but would not elaborate.


February 2018
The man adamantly denied his involvement and has said that he voluntarily gave the ISP a sample of his DNA.

February 13, 2018 – the one-year anniversary
LE held a press conference at the MHB trail, and Superintendent Doug Carter stated, “We cannot allow, we cannot allow evil to prevail.”

It was announced that 30,000 tips had been received in the case, but LE said they still need one more piece of the puzzle.

Doug Carter: “I believe we’re one piece of the puzzle away from figuring out who this individual is.

Delphi investigators requested assistance in the case from the Georgia Bureau of Investigations (GBI) and FBI officers from other field offices. However, the overall number of investigators on the case was scaled back and the command center returned to its original small office space at Delphi City Hall.


#2 – April Tinsley’s Killer
April Tinsley was abducted in Fort Wayne, IN (about two hours from Delphi) in 1988 while walking to a friend’s house to retrieve her forgotten umbrella. Her body was found in a ditch three days later in southern DeKalb County. She was sexually assaulted and strangled to death within 24 hours of her abduction. The killer taunted LE in 1990 with poorly spelled messages that claimed responsibility for April’s murder. The first message was scrawled in crayon on the side of an old barn, and the spelling errors were believed to be intentional to throw off investigators. Four subsequent notes, purportedly left by her killer, were found on bicycles belonging to other children in the neighborhood and were accompanied by used condoms. Despite the evidence left behind, the killer eluded LE for 30 years.

Genealogical testing showed the DNA from semen samples belonged to one of two brothers. After obtaining a search warrant, LE took DNA samples from one of their homes and were able to match the DNA to the samples collected in April’s case. In 2018, JM pled guilty to the murder of April Tinsley.

Sgt. Kim Riley refused to discuss whether JM was considered a suspect in Libby and Abby’s killings, but he doesn’t appear to resemble the sketch and his MO is decidedly different from the Delphi killer.


#3 – Catholic Supply Store Killer

November 19, 2018
A 53-year-old former pastor entered a Catholic supply store in St. Louis, MO (290 miles away) at 3:00 pm and forced three women into a back room at gun point. He ordered the three women to strip and shot one of them in the head when she refused. He then raped and sodomized the other two before leaving the store. The pastor was arrested at his trailer home two days later.

Similarities to the Delphi murders:
  • an attack on multiple female victims during the daytime
  • the pastor was wearing a navy blue jacket, plaid shirt, and newsboy cap during the attack
  • he was a white man with a mustache and goatee
  • he appeared to be in the 5’7” to 5’9” and 200 pound range
Jerry Holeman has said LE is aware of the similarities and has been in contact with authorities in St. Louis County.

Important factors to note:
  • the St. Louis crime appeared to be one of opportunity – the suspect cased the store, returned to his vehicle to retrieve a gun, and then accosted the females inside
  • after his arrest, LE linked the pastor to an unsolved attack on a 77-year-old woman in Jefferson County two months earlier (he knocked on her door at random, pushed her aside, assaulted her, and forced her to perform sex acts on him)
  • his wife was blindsided by his arrest and those who knew him were shocked by the charges
  • he was stationed at the same military base as a woman who was murdered in 1985 (another man was executed for the crime but The Innocence Project maintains he was innocent)
  • his pending charges are likely part of the reason investigators haven’t commented on the case or confirmed/denied his connections to Delphi
#4 – Child Sex Offender Busted in Sting

January 8, 2019
A man who resembled the sketch was arrested in Union City, Indiana (116 miles from Delphi) after he attempted to meet with an undercover officer posing online as a 13-year-old girl

The ISP released a statement that read:
“The Delphi Multi-agency Investigative Team and participating agencies continue to receive media and public inquiries asking about the person arrested January 8th, 2019 in Union City, Randolph County, Indiana for allegations of sexually related crimes against children and if he is connected to the Delphi investigation. The team is aware of this arrest and will investigate to see if there can be any connection to the murders that occurred in Delphi, Indiana on February 13th of 2017.”
  • he admitted to engaging in sex acts with another child under the age of 13 on multiple occasions
  • his mugshot depicts a jowly man with reddish-brown hair, a bulbous nose, a mustache, and hooded eyes
  • his family has described him as a violent, oddball loner who masturbated in front of children, liked to spend time in the woods, and a short, stocky G.I. Joe wannabe
  • he’s a former security guard
  • he posted on SM about the Delphi murders
January 10, 2019
Randolph County LE issued a statement saying there is currently zero evidence that ties him to this case and is not a suspect in the case

January 19, 2019
ISP Captain Dave Burston released a statement to the effect that police had no evidence suggesting or disproving whether he is connected to Abby or Libby’s murders

#5 – Nicole Bowen’s Killer

March 29, 2019
A 21-year-old man was arrested in Kentland (about 35 miles from Delphi) for the murder of NB
  • he would have been 19 at the time of the murders
  • he shared the same physique as BG in February 2017 with a heavyset frame
  • has ties to Delphi (an hour’s drive from his home in Lebanon)
  • his girlfriend is from Delphi
  • there’s some indication he’s spent time on/near RL’s property and has a connection to the Logan family
  • a photo of a horse on his FB page has identical markings as a horse on RL’s farm, as seen in an Inside Edition interview
#6 – Flat Tire Attacker

January 22, 2019 @ 4:30 am
A 26-year-old woman got a flat tire while driving to Delphi. She was in Tippecanoe County on County Road 900 East at the time and was approached by a man from a nearby home when she pulled her car off the side of the road. The man gave her a weird vibe, so she drove off and then pulled into a friend’s driveway on County Road 900 North. The man followed her, pulled in behind her, and then attacked her using force without a weapon. He drove the woman to a remote barn on his family’s farm property on County Road 775 East and sexually assaulted her for the next five hours. Surprisingly, the man drove her to her vehicle around 9:30 am and dropped her off. The attacker fled and eluded police by hiding out in the woods for five days. He then stole a pickup truck and killed himself by shooting himself twice in the head during a standoff with Boone County police officers.
  • he posted an apology to his friends, family, LE, and the community on social media before he killed himself
  • he sent a picture of himself wearing an IUD necklace around his neck to a woman he’d been texting with and called it a trophy
  • Sheriff Leazenby said they had already been looking at this man because he had been called into the tip line
  • he was 5’9” tall, approximately 170 pounds, with brown eyes
  • he’d been bald for at least a few years before his death
  • he lived in Lafayette (only 15 miles from Delphi)
  • he was known to love the woods and was very comfortable there
  • he had instances of domestic battery and two other felonies in his past
  • he had a suspicious online interaction with someone in Delphi and a friend of Libby’s family
  • a post-mortem DNA profile and copy of his autopsy report were requested by Delphi LE
  • he sent a FB message to someone that read “the sheriff suggested that things have been happening in the Delphi area in the past few months, any idea what he is referring to?”
 
Scene of the Crime: Delphi — A New Direction
Episode 6

The podcast first talks a bit about connections to the murders of Lyric Cook (10) and Elizabeth Collins (8) on July 13th of 2012 in Evansdale, IA. The girls were last seen riding their bikes near Myers Lake between 12:30 and 1:00 pm. Around 4pm, a firefighter discovered their bicycles and Elizabeth's purse near the lake.

December 5, 2012
The bodies of Lyric and Elizabeth were discovered by hunters in a wildlife park 20 miles away. The park is mostly used by hunters, ATV riders, and residents dumping old furniture and appliances. The bodies were found 20 yards apart and were partly obscured by brush. The bodies were badly decomposed, but the ME was able to determine the COD. That information has never been made public, and the presence of DNA (or lack thereof) in the case is unknown.

Three witnesses told LE they'd seen an older white SUV that was large and boxy (possibly a Chevy Suburban or Ford Bronco) parked on a road that meets up with the trail where the girl's bikes were located between 11:30 and 12:30 pm on July 13, 2012.

August 21, 2014
An FBI profile was released that said the following about the suspect:

- he/she is familiar with Myers Lake and the Seven Bridges wildlife area
- he/she is unlikely to be a transient
- he/she likely used quiet coercion or a ruse to abduct the girls rather than threats of violence
- he/she has likely altered their appearance since the abductions
- he/she likely cleaned, painted, or modified their vehicle after the abductions

Delphi & Evansdale Similarities

- unsolved
- dual abduction
- abduction occured midday
- abducted in a small town in the Midwest
- occurred on a weekday near the weekend (Delphi: Monday; Evansdale: Friday)
- last ween on the 13th day of the month
- bodies found in remote and wooded areas
- last seen on a walking trail
- pork processing plants are nearby

The primary difference between the Delphi & Evansdale cases is the disposal of the bodies. The girls were left where they were killed in Delphi; the girls were transported 30 miles away and hidden behind brush in the Evansdale case.

Dr. Katherine M. Brown (regarding dual abductions):
"I've only seen a couple in my entire career because child abduction murders, in and of themselves, are incredibly rare -- which is fortunate -- but the abduction of two children at one time is even, even rarer. If you're examining the rarity from an offender perspective, it really does increase their risk to abduct two children at one time."

Drew Collins (investigator in the Evansdale, IA case):
"They both happened on the 13th, they're both in like secluded areas on trails. I don't know, it just seemed too familiar. And, uh, so I actually reached out to Mike, and um, talked to them a little bit when it first happened. And, uh, but just nothing ever came of it."

LE in Delphi believe the similarities are coincidental and believe the two cases are unrelated.

February 13, 2019
A joint press conference is held at the Carroll County Courthouse with the ISP, Carroll County Sheriff's Office, the FBI, and Delphi PD.

Sgt. Kim Riley introduced Carroll County prosecutor Nick McClellan.
McClellan announced that 38,000 tips had been received and said a dozen or more were received on any given day. He asked the public to refrain from posting side-by-side images of people they speculate are involved, and encouraged others to report their tips. He said "they could have the missing piece of the puzzle". He reminded the public about the $240,000 reward and spoke about the type of information LE considers ideal.

Doug Carter addresses the killer directly:
"If you're watching, we're coming. If you're watching, we are coming."

Six days later, LE announced a press conference would be held on Monday, February 22nd at the Wabash Erie Canal Conference and Interpretive Center in Delphi at noon. The PC would be open to the public with limited seating.

February 22, 2019 Press Conference
Superintendent Doug Carter: "Information being released today is the result of literally thousands and thousands of hours of extraordinary investigative efforts by Delphi, Carroll County, the Indiana State Police, and countless other agencies.

After you hear what we're going to release today, I'm going to ask for your continued support, your continued understanding, your continued empathy and compassion, um, as we move forward to find out who did this. And, we will.

We're seeking the public's help to identify the driver of a vehicle that was parked at the old CPS/DCS welfare building in the city of Delphi, that was abandoned on the east side of Delphi County Road 300, northwest to the Hoosier Heartland Highway, between the hours of noon to five on February 14, 2017. If you were parked there or know who was parked there, please contact the officers at the command post at the Delphi City Building."

The physical address of the old CPS/DCS building is 6931 West 300 North. The podcast clarifies that LE has reason to believe a car was parked there on the 13th -- not the 14th as Carter misstated. The podcast points out that this information is likely due to new information because LE had previously said (on February 2018) that they had no reason to believe the suspect was parked in a vehicle nearby because they had no information on a vehicle.

May 7, 2019
Sgt. Kim Riley clarified that LE had determined the suspect likely had a vehicle after reviewing many tips. It was also clarified that the vehicle was not parked in the empty lot at the building but parked along the roadside (which may be why it attracted the attention of a witness, if it did so).


Doug Carter (con't from the press conference):
"We're releasing additional portions of the audio recording from that day. Please keep in mind, the person talking is one person and is the person on the bridge with the girls. This is not two different people speaking. Please listen to it very, very carefully."

[Audio: "Guys... down the hill."]

"We're also releasing video recovered from Libby's phone. This video has never before been previously released. The video shows the suspect walking on the bridge. When you see the video, watch the person's mannerisms as they walk. Watch the mannerisms as he walks. Do you recognize the mannerisms as being someone you might know? Remember, he is walking on the former railroad bridge. Because of the deteriorated condition of the bridge, the suspect is not walking naturally due to the spacing between the ties."

During the course of this investigation, we have concluded the first sketch released will become secondary. As of today, the result of new information and intelligence over time leads us to believe that the sketch -- which you will see shortly -- is the person responsible for the murders of these two little girls. We also believe this person is from Delphi, currently or has previously lived here, visits Delphi on a regular basis, or works here. We believe this person is currently between the age range of 18-40 but might appear younger than his true age."

The newly released sketch depicts:
a younger man with a pointed chin, small eyes, thin lips, and bushy or even moderately curly, short hair

LE later clarified that the new sketch -- who is the man on the bridge -- is not the same person as the initial sketch. The person in the first sketch might not even exist as depicted. It might be a fabrication based on several combined and fading memories.

The new sketch is the result of a drawing session with a witness on February 17, 2017 and was drawn by ISP Master Trooper, Taylor Bryant. He uses a facial identification reference sheet that has a list of different categories from head shapes to different eyebrows and noses. The witness attempts to describe the suspect based on the categories.

April 24, 2019
Multi-agency Task Force Clarifies Points about Delphi Murder Suspect Sketches

"Authorities originally believed the initial sketch depicting an older man was the person of interest in the case. Only after the investigation matured and past information has been reassessed did the task force come to believe that the person in the new sketch is the killer."

The two sketches are not the same person; the new sketch is of someone completely different than the one in the initial sketch. The man in the old sketch is not currently a POI in the Delphi murders, and in effect, should be ignored.

The statement advised that the suspect may have changed his appearance and now look difference. LE confirmed that a number of sketches were in the case file that were created in the days after the murders.

Doug Carter (speaking with Kelsi for the podcast):
"Remember, a sketch is just a visual. It's not a photo. It's a visual of what somebody might've seen, so that's all I'll say about the sketch."

In response to Kelsi asking why the two sketches look so different:
"I can't talk a lot about that in detail, but I'll simply say the investigation has evolved and there are things we know that we can't explain. I know there was a lot of anxiety about that, and even some confusion and some blame and some criticism of us. Um, that criticism needs to come to me. Not to anybody else because I--I--I absolutely supported that change."

July 2019
The FBI altered the suspect's description on their website to 180-200 pounds
(20 pounds lighter than the original description)

Doug Carter (con't from press conference):
"Directly to the killer -- who may be in this room -- we believe you're hiding in plain sight. For more than two years, you never thought we would shift gears to a different investigative strategy but we have. We likely have interviewed you, or someone close to you, and we know that this is about power to you. And, you want to know what we know. And, one day you will."

"A question to you--what will those closest to you think of when they find out what you brutally murdered two little girls, two children? Only a coward would do such a thing. We are confident that you've told someone what you've done, or at the very least, they know because of how different you are since the murders."

"We try so hard to understand how a person can do something like this to two children. And, I recently watched a movie called The Shack -- and there's also a book that talks so well about evil, about death, and about eternity. To the murderer, I believe you have just a little bit of a conscience left, and I can assure you that how you left them in that woods is not--is not what they're experiencing today."

The podcast talks about how the press conference seemed designed to attract the killer, as it was announced three days in advance and was open to the public. However, child abduction expert Dr. Katherine M. Brown says that this tactic is not likely to succeed.

Doug Carter (con't from the February 22nd press conference):
"I can tell you on behalf of the sheriff, and the police chief, and so many other partners that have stood with us over this period of time, that we will not stop."

April 22, 2019
PRESS RELEASE: "New Face of the Delphi Murder Suspect"

The release announced the new sketch and described it as more accurately depicting the face of the suspect from the video on Libby's phone.

The official release contradicted Carter in two minor ways--
1. The release describes the suspect as someone in their mid-20s to mid-30s; Carter described him between the ages of 18 and 40 but may appear younger
2. The release said they "We have a witness. You made mistakes. We are coming for you, and there's no place for a heartless coward like you to hid that gets his thrill from killing little girls." ; Carter never mentioned the mistakes or the witness

The caption displayed by the new sketch on the official press release:
"This is the face of the suspect that goes with the body on the video on Liberty German's phone minutes before she and Abigail Williams were murdered."

Carter (while speaking with Kelsi about the sketches):
"For people who look at that sketch, they think 'Oh my God, that person is twenty years younger than the initial one' and they view it as a photograph. That's not what a sketch is. So, while we believe that people are literally trying to help, this type of side-by-side comparison does not help."

The release of the new sketch generated 1,000 new tips within 24 hours and 2,000 within the first week.

A few weeks after the PC, Carter said he didn't know if the suspect was at the PC but 100% believes he was watching. He said information gathered over the previous 26 months indicates the suspect is watching LE's every move. He said the murderer got complacent because he didn't know LE would release the second sketch and felt comfortable that they had overlooked it. He said LE has likely spoken with the suspect already and said LE were onto something very early on.
 
Scene of the Crime: Delphi — Resolve

46,000 tips have been received as of November 2019, and each tip has been entered into the FBI system called Pyramid.

Superintendent Doug Carter:
“We had so many that we couldn’t manage them early on, and we’re up to around 46,000 now. That’s why we brought in the system the FBI offered."

The Pyramid system stores and catalogs information like names, descriptions, and motives that can be cross-referenced. The system also looks for possible connections to other crimes in other areas of the country.

Callers are encouraged to convey the following information:
Suspect's Name
DOB or Approximate Age
Physical Description (height, weight, hair color, eye color)
Address or Location Last Seen
Vehicle Descriptions (license plate, year, make, model, color)
Reason for Tip (why does caller believe he/she could be the suspect)
Motivation to the Crime
Connection to Delphi


The official date of death for Abby and Libby differs and has caused rampant speculation. The official date of death for Abby is February 14, 2017 and February 13, 2017 for Libby. Indiana law allows the family to choose the date of death based on the date the victim was killed or the date the victim was found. The two families simply chose different dates.

Kelsi spoke to Superintendent Doug Carter about rumors involving a police cover up:
Carter: “I’ve had those conversations with people before, ya know, those are private conversations, but I promise you on the lives of the two people I find most important to me in my lifetime — and that’s my daughter and my wife — that while I’m here, there will be nothing of the like. And, that’s just a rumor. In today’s world, it’s easy to say something like that, but take a step back and think about what it would mean for that to actually occur. It just did not.”

Kelsi:
“It’s been extremely hurtful to hear some of the things that people out there say. I think it’s really defeating to know that people will read something on the internet about a person and believe that thing without confirming that it’s fact with the family. And, the things that they say definitely aren’t true, but the things that they’re saying are so crazy that half of them are impossible. Half of them are really disgusting and disturbing things that they have to say just because they want to make something up, to make the crime make sense to them, I guess in a way? It takes a lot of energy out of us. It makes us feel that maybe we should just stop talking because if we stop talking, they’ll have nothing to talk about. They’ll be done if we’re done. It kinda takes away from the case in more ways than one.”

Kelsi has publicly responded to several rumors to clarify the following:
  • Libby was not pregnant or dating a much older boy (or anyone else, for that matter)
  • Libby's phone was not tracked moving around town after the girls went missing; it pinged two towers but never left the MHB trail
  • Cody had an alibi -- he was at work
  • Derrick does not participate in public appearances because he simply wants to grieve privately and doesn’t trust the media to accurately convey his words without twisting them or even misreporting them
  • Libby’s family has been completely cooperative; family members have taken polygraphs, submitted DNA, handed over electronics and records, and answered each and every question posed to them by investigators over the course of multiple interviews
A review of the known facts:
  • Abby and Libby posted a Snapchat photo on the MHB around 2:07 pm
  • BG was approaching the girls on the bridge by 2:30 pm
  • the still image of BG depicts a white man wearing a dark blue zip-up jacket over a hoodie, jeans, and he was possibly wearing a hat and fanny pack
  • Libby surreptitiously recorded BG on her phone
  • BG can be seen and heard on the video from Libby's phone
  • BG ordered the girls down the hill and murdered them on RL’s property, across the stream from the end of the bridge and in a remote wooded area
  • Libby’s shoe, phone, and possibly some clothing were found nearby
  • LE believes BG is between the age of 18-40, 5’6” to 5’10” tall, approximately 180-200 pounds, and may appear younger than his true age
Experienced profilers and experts believe that BG arrived at the bridge prepared to kill for the following reasons:
  • bulky items appear to be hidden under his jacket
  • his confidence that no witnesses were anywhere near the bridge
  • his ability to silently and stealthily attack two victims
  • his ability to avoid leaving clues and evidence
  • he successfully covered his tracks
  • the absence of a traceable digital footprint, as he didn't take Libby’s phone (if he knew about it) and doesn't appear to have had a phone on him

These facts point to a disciplined and organized killer including a level of planning and patience. An immature, spontaneous, and narcissistic killer would likely fail to keep his awful secret to himself the way that it seems BG has.

Sgt. Robert Ives:
“Well, human nature being what it is, it’s hard for me to believe anybody could do something so bizarre and horrible and not feel compelled to tell somebody about it.”

Dr. Katherine M. Brown:
“The majority of these victims are, unfortunately, victims of opportunity. The offender’s not really looking for a particular age of child, um, they just happen to be looking and that opportunity essentially presents itself for them to abduct a child. And, so, when you have dual abductions, it’s likely the offender may have just intended to abduct one child but then two children with a lack of, say, an appropriate guardian or anyone around them, the opportunity just presented itself and they chose to take both children.”

In regards to the theory that the girls had planned to meet up with someone they knew from social media--

Becky Patty (Libby's grandmother/guardian):
“I would get on her phone. I never really noticed anything bad on there, and like I said, I-I-I had passwords to most of her accounts. That I could get on there at any time if I wanted to see what was going on. You know, they have never questioned anything to us on social media.”

Kelsi also checked all of Libby’s social media accounts that day, as well as all of her phone messages. As for Abby’s secret FB account, the clandestine contact found on her FB page was just a normal teenage boy. And, remember that LE has video and audio of the girls discussing BG as he approached them. If they had known him, they would've said so.

Former Prosecutor Robert Ives:
“There was no logical reason anybody would’ve known those girls would be there that day. And, a lot of investigation went into determining did anybody know. The reason they were out there, in the most general sense, is that it was an outrageously beautiful day for February. I’ve never seen anything that would lead me to believe that anybody would’ve known they were coming.”

BG may have been on the trails that day hoping to find a victim — any victim — and possibly knew that children were likely to be there given that it was a planned school holiday, the weather was nice, and the bridge area was something of a teen hangout. It's also possible that he knew about the nearby geocache locations, knew they would attract young people, and that the bridge dead ends in remote and wooded area where his victims would be trapped.

Dr. Katherine M. Brown:
“Most of the time they’re out looking, or maybe they’ve seen the child, or they abduct a child that is fairly close to where they live or where they work. So, they tend to operate in areas they are very familiar with. And, so, they may not be stalking a particular child, but they may be primed and ready to engage in this type of behavior.”

A conversation between Doug Carter & Kelsi about the suspect being local:

Carter:
“My own personal opinion--probably at least some familiarity with the Delphi area. But, that’s just me.”

Kelsi:
“I think that you have to know the Delphi area to go across that bridge.”

Carter:
“Well, that’s why I say that. If you’ve gone across the bridge, then you understand. Right?

Kelsi:
“That bridge is scary.”

Carter:
“It is scary. I don’t think there’s been a train on that bridge since 1929, and those railroad ties are rotted.

Kelsi:
“Yeah, that bridge scares me. So, for somebody to be able to cross it. Just like watching the short video, watching him cross it in that little bit, you’re like he’s moving well enough that he has to know the bridge.”

Carter:
“Yeah, he’s done that before.”


Someone local to the area would know about the isolated property were the girls were killed. He might even be aware of Deer Creek’s shallow crossable spot. A local would know best how to leave the area without attracting attention, and of course, that Delphi schools were closed that day.

There is some indication that investigators believe the suspect has moved on from Delphi or is known outside the area — considering the national billboard campaign and the willingness of LE to travel with the family to speak at national conventions.


Former Prosecutor Robert Ives:
“I thought, initially, it had to be somebody local, as people have said. And now, I really don’t know. I guess I’m afraid it might be somebody who happened to be there at the right time. I’m shocked, and I promise you the police are shocked, that it wasn’t solved in a day or two. Because it just didn’t seem — we’re just not used to — in rural Indiana, if Person A murders Person B, it’s obvious who the suspects are.”

Criminal Profiler John Douglas has said that BG's use of the word “guys” indicates he perhaps knew his victims or possibly interacts with children. In his opinion, BG likely has some kind of criminal history.

John Douglas:
“You don’t wake up one day and commit a double homicide like this. There has to be some kind of trail.”

Dr. Katherine M. Brown:
“It is much more likely that these offenders will commit a crime against children—do have a pretty high percentage of child abduction murderers who have committed serious crimes against children.”

Robert Ives:
“I don’t say this person’s a serial killer. All I can say is that, generally, you only get killed by your friends. You only get killed by your relatives. If you can trust your spouse, your girlfriend, your boyfriend—because almost all murders in rural Indiana are crimes of passion—somebody’s really mad about something. You’re not killed by a stranger. They don’t kill you to take your wallet. They don’t kill you to high jack your car. They kill you because they’re mad about some romantic relationship, or some family relationship, or something like that. That’s what happens. This is not like that, there’s no apparent motive. There’s no logical reason for it. It makes no sense.”

Asked what type of person killed Abby and Libby, Ives said “a person with no conscience, a sociopath.”

Doug Carter (to the Indy Channel):
“I’ll never be able to unsee what I saw that day.”

Robert Ives:
“That period of time, and those deaths, is the worst thing that I can recall. I grew up in Carroll County; I lived there my whole life. It’s just, as crimes, they’re horrifying. And, for me, it was just very frustrating. A lot of people are working very hard, and officers are coming from all these surrounding counties to help, and a lot of really sharp people are working really hard and it’s so frustrating that we can’t find any justice. It’s—It’s horrible, and it bothers me today. And, I wish—I wish they would get a breakthrough and I wish there was something else I could do to help, but I don’t know what there is that I can do to help. So, as a frustration in my career, it’s by a huge margin, the worst case, the worst crime, and the most frustrating outcome so far that I can recall.”

DNA Expert Paul Holes:
“Generally, when we’re looking at violent crime, the types of DNA evidence that might be left behind, uh, is usually, you know, in the form of what I call the ‘Big Three’: blood, semen, or saliva. And, in this day of modern day testing, with its sensitivity, uh, we can also deal with hairs, uh contact DNA, ya know touch DNA, wearer DNA—somebody drops a baseball cap behind. So, there is a large array of evidence items. Umm, but you know, in talking about the Big Three—blood, semen, or saliva—uh, you know most people think that blood is just this awesome source of DNA, and in reality, at least for the type of DNA that’s used in crime labs, nuclear DNA testing—um, it’s actually a very poor source of DNA. Uh, uh, in blood, the primary—the primary cells in blood are red blood cells, which everybody knows from high school biology, but the thing about red blood cells is that they’re anuclear. They don’t have a nucleus where a DNA is at, so red blood cells are a poor source of DNA. Fortunately, blood has white blood cells that have a lot of DNA in them. And, ya know, somebody who has, say, a massive infection or has leukemia, who’s white blood cell count is off the charts, their blood actually contains a tremendous amount of DNA in it. Um, but generally, blood is a poor source of DNA than something like semen. If there’s sperm present, the male DNA in semen is predominantly found in the sperm. And, as long as they’re a normal male, producing a normal amount of sperm, there’s typically a lot of DNA in a semen sample. The same goes with saliva. With saliva, the fluid saliva doesn’t contain a lot of DNA, but because it’s coming out of the mouth, and the mouth is lined with the epithelium—this coating, this tissue—it has these epithelia cells that are constantly falling off and mixing with the saliva. So, saliva typically is a very good source of DNA. That’s why we can go after DNA from cigarette butts, or chewing gum, or drinking straws. Uh, cause it does generally have a lot of DNA in it. It just really comes down to a matter of how much saliva, or how much semen, or how much blood is deposited at the crime scene, and then in what condition is it in. Ya know, if we’re dealing with an old case, uh, it’s possible that the DNA has degraded over time for a variety of reasons.”


“When evidence is in water, especially something brackish where you have microorganisms, there is a greater likelihood that the DNA is going to be degraded and/or, possibly, the source of the DNA is going to kinda be dissolving, solubilizing into that water. And, uh, you’re going to lose DNA evidence the longer it sits in the water. With that being said, you still have to go after that kind of evidence. And, just to give you an anecdotal example, I have a 1980 case—Suzanne Bombardier—she was a 14-year-old girl that was abducted out of her apartment and found stabbed, floating in the delta in the Bay Area, many days—I forget exactly how long, three or four days—nude. And, uh, over time, we had tested samples from her body and had just failed to get any type of DNA. Up until, basically, right before I retired, we had, uh, a swab—an external genitalia swab—uh, that we were able to get a full DNA profile from and searched the FBI’s CODIS database. And, that ultimately gave us enough to arrest Mitch Bacom, who was a boyfriend of the victim’s older sister. And, this just shows the tremendous improvement in the DNA testing, uh, technology. This was a swab from the outside surface of a nude victim that had been floating in just dirty, filthy water in the Bay Area for days, and we were able to get a DNA profile from that. So, when I hear cases in which labs refuse to test items that have been put in water because they believe they won’t get a DNA profile, I will press hard and say no. You need to go after that; you don’t know until you look. Don’t just assume you can’t get a DNA profile because there are examples out there of success under those situations.”


“We can’t limit ourselves to going after DNA from the Big Three in this day and age, with the sensitivity of DNA testing, now we’re looking at the contact DNA. And, that’s hit or miss. Uh, ya know, sometimes you can get a great DNA profile from, ya know, an object that somebody touched. And, sometimes—many—times you can’t get any DNA from something that somebody’s touched.”


Founder of the Doe Project -- Colleen Fitzpatrick:
“If I meet you and we shake hands—I meet you and we haven’t seen each other in a while, and we shake hands, give a hug, you know, we talk a minute and go away. And, then I go somewhere and I murder somebody or I go into a house, it’s been shown that because we shook hands, when I touch that doorknob, your DNA might be on the doorknob.”

Paul Holes:
“When you start swabbing door handles, as an example, to try to recover DNA, you typically get three, four, five or more people’s DNA in that door handle. And, it just becomes an uninterpretable mess.”

“In any particular case, we have to account for the possibility that DNA that has been recovered is coming from just their normal living environment. The people that they are in contact with, uh, over the course of their normal life. Ya know, whether it’s a boyfriend or girlfriend or whether it’s family members. And, so investigators will typically ask, uh, for elimination samples from those individuals. Uh, and the DNA lab will generate DNA profiles for family members or consensual partners, to always have on file to compare to any unknown DNA that is present within the case. It is not unusual to find DNA from family members or consensual partners that obviously has nothing to do with why someone was murdered. And, you’ll want to figure that out as soon as possible in the investigation, so your investigators aren’t just going down a rabbit hole thinking that they have probative DNA. You want to eliminate anybody in that person’s life that you possibly can to ensure that you have a good offender DNA sample that you can now start comparing to potential suspects.”

It seems the DNA in this case might be enough to eliminate suspects but not enough for a complete profile.

Paul Holes:
“Lets say a full DNA profile being the equivalent of the number 10, and you know, you have a partial DNA profile that’s 7 out of 10, it’s possible that with that 7, if you get the right guy that matches that 7, that might be sufficient—where now you have confidence that you have the right guy. So, just the fact that it’s a partial DNA profile doesn’t mean that all is lost. Oftentimes, what we run into with DNA evidence is we get a DNA profile that is not a complete DNA profile because there’s just too little DNA present, or it’s too degraded, or it’s a mixture—it’s DNA that is mixed with somebody else’s DNA. What we can do in those instances, if we get a suspect and we get that suspect’s DNA profile, we can see if that suspect’s type is present in that partial profile or present within the mixture. Um, and so we can eliminate that person as being a contributor of the DNA to that sample.

Sgt. Kim Riley would not confirm or deny that familial DNA technologies were being used in the Delphi case, but he did say LE was working closely with investigators in the April Tinsley case to see if their findings could help serve the murders of Abby and Libby.

Paul Holes:
“Shortly after solving the Golden State Killer case, um, I did speak with an investigator that was involved with the Delphi murders. Um, and he provided some information regarding that particular case. And, ya know, fundamentally, he was looking for, um, some insight into how the Golden State Killer case was solved and whether or not there was any applicability to that type of strategy with the case that he had. Um, he did provide me some, uh, details, uh, about the case which he does not want to have made public.”

Holes did say that Delphi investigators have a tough road ahead of them.

In January 2019, Sheriff Tobe Lazenby stated that further evidence had been sent to the FBI at the end of 2018 and they were conducting DNA testing research. This could indicate that new methods of extraction, such as the M-Vac system or the new method for extracting DNA from a rootless hair are being used. Lazenby continued: “We are doing DNA testing research with 23 & Me and the other places that do it. That is something that has been discussed.”

For genealogy DNA research to work, the DNA of a family member of the suspect would have to already be in the genealogy database. That DNA would then have to be uploaded to GEDmatch or another similar service that allows the public access to its database for research purposes. This is what was done for other suspects, such as Joseph DeAngelo and John Miller. GEDmatch currently requires users to opt in for police use. However, if less than a full DNA profile was found in the Delphi case or the DNA was degraded, then forensic genealogy may not work.

Colleen Fitzpatrick:
“Well, uh, it depends on the, you know, quality and the quantity. So, if you have a lot of really good DNA—one way to look at it, if you have very degraded DNA or DNA that has, uh, bacterial contamination, you know, that can present challenges.”

Paul Holes:
“Those types of samples [partial or degraded] do not lend themselves to doing the type of genealogy DNA testing that we need in order to use the genealogy tool. So, we’re stuck to just being able to eliminate. But, we can’t pursue the investigative leads that the forensic genealogy testing could possibly give us.”

Colleen Fitzpatrick:
“Your unknown person--who is a man or woman--could be an immigrant, for example. He could be a German immigrant, or even French immigrant, in the UK. He could be a child of immigrants, in which case he probably doesn’t have a whole lot of family in the United States. And, even if they’re here, they probably haven’t taken one of the DNA tests enough for it to GEDmatch.”

Paul Holes (in reference to phenotyping--analyzing DNA to determine personal traits):
“It still requires going back to the original DNA extract that the crime lab has produced. If there’s enough of that remaining, it’s possible that this other technology—this sniff testing technology—might be able to get enough in order to generate enough of a sniff profile for this phenotyping. It’s, ya know, what color is this individual’s eyes? What’s the individual’s ethnicity? Uh, those types of traits. Um, that is case by case.”

Currently, the number of investigators working on the case on a daily basis has been reduced to the single digits.
 
Down the Hill: The Delphi Murders
Episode 1, Chapter 1 — Walk on the Bridge

DTH is hosted by veteran journalists/producers Barbara MacDonald, Dan Szematowicz and Andrew Iden. The Scene Of the Crime podcast was more or less a reiteration of the facts, whereas DTH tells the story from the perspective of those closest to the victims.

The podcast speaks with following individuals in this episode:
Kelsi German - Libby’s sister
Doug Carter - Indiana State Police Superintendent
Becky Patty - Libby & Kelsi’s grandmother and legal guardian
Mike Patty - Libby & Kelsi’s grandfather and legal guardian
Anna Williams - Abby’s mother
Diane Erskine - Abby’s grandmother
Tobe Leazenby - Carroll County Sheriff
Darryl Sterrett - Delphi Fire Chief
Shane Evans - Mayor of Delphi
Erica Gibson - Friend of Abby and Libby
Cynthia Rossi - Friend of Abby and Libby
Todd Ladd (TL) - Pastor at Delphi United Methodist Church

Becky Patty:
“They [the girls] didn’t get up until probably close to 10:00 or so, and they wanted pancakes. So, Derrick made them pancakes for breakfast. And then, later on, Libby come out—she was bored. You know, what can we do? Kelsi came out and said that she was going to, um, her friend’s house and then she had to work.”

Kelsi German:
“And so, I went upstairs and I started getting ready in our bathroom. And I very much remember her opening the door really wide—with Abby behind her—as I’m getting dressed. And she’s like, ‘hey Kels, do you wanna go to High Bridge today?’ And I was like, ‘Lib, I’m obviously getting ready to leave, I can’t take you today.’ And a little while later, I was like, I have really been saying no to her a lot lately, so I went downstairs and I said, ‘hey, if you can find a ride and grandma says yes, I will take you.’ And she ended up asking grandma, and grandma said yes, and then she called my dad to pick her up. And, that’s when I agreed to take her.”

Becky Patty:
“And then she said her dad would pick her up, so I said okay. And, that’s when they were getting ready to leave and Abby was standing at the door. And, that’s when I told her that you—you need to take a jacket. It’s nice, but you know, who knows? You need to take a jacket. And, that’s when she looked at me and said, ‘it’s okay, grandma.’ Gave me that smile and off they went.”

Kelsi German:
“When we left, Libby was sitting up front and Abby was in the back. Neither of them had brought sweatshirts which was really confusing to me. So, I actually ran back inside and got Abby one of mine and Libby had one in my back seat, since she always rode with me. So, I made them take those. And then we turned Heathens by 21 Pilots up really loud. And, they were—had the windows down, and we were singing to it. And, it’s not a super far drive. And so, we got there pretty quick it felt like. And then, we stopped at the entrance to High Bridge, and I made sure they both had their sweatshirts that I told them to take. And, I told Libby I loved her and I watched them walk away.

Becky Patty:
“Kelsi and Libby would go out there a lot. They’ve got all kinds of pictures that they used to go out there and take. So, it wasn’t uncommon and we knew there had been some other kids out there. Because when she had asked, Kelsi had talked to her friend and she’d been—she was out there. As a matter of fact, I thought when they went that she was still there.”

Becky Patty:
“Derrick called, it was about 3:30. He said I’m here at the trailhead and Libby’s not answering her phone. He said I don’t know what’s going on, and that he was going to walk around. He said, ‘you call and see if she answers for you.’ So, I started calling and texting and nothing happened. So, Tara—I said ‘hey, you try’. So, we were taking turns trying, and texting, and calling. And there was no answer or anything, so by a little before 4:00, I said we probably need to go look for them. So, well, Tara said I’ll go on and I called Mike at work and said, ‘Libby—they’re out at the trails, and they’re—Libby’s not answering her phone. We’re gonna go and start looking for ‘em.’ And, he said well let me finish up here and I’ll be there. So, I thought, well, there’s two different ways— if they decided to walk home—that they could’ve come. So, we drove both different ways from there that they could’ve possibly walked. And, they weren’t there. So we got to the trailhead and I parked. There was, at that time, several cars there. And I had to park across the road, in kinda the ditch.”

Kelsi German:
“It was my grandma [calling] and she was freaking out. She couldn’t find Libby anywhere and she wasn’t answering her phone. It was really unlike Libby to do something like that, so I—I think in my mind, I thought ‘oh, she lost her phone or she must have fallen on the other side of the bridge’ because I know that they probably crossed it. Because I know Libby. I didn’t think that Abby would have, so that was a little, um, a little weird to me. But, I was sure that like there was a logical explanation, and it was just some fluke that happened.”

Anna Williams:
“I had seen missed calls, and that was like 5-5:30. It was kind of early in the evening. And she was like, ‘the girls were out on a walk’ and just a whole jarbbled things going on, ‘and we’re down at the sheriff’s department.’ And I’m like, ‘okay, I’m on my way’ and checked out the couple of customers I had. I remember feeling a slight bit like strange but not like overly panicked. I just told them the girls—‘Abby and Libby were out on a walk, and apparently, they’re missing. I gotta go down to the sheriff’s department.’ And she was like, ‘okay, well let us know what’s going on, and you know, just make sure everything’s okay.’ And I’m like, ‘yep no problem, see ya in a little while. I don’t know if I’ll be back tonight, but you know, I’ll see what I can do.’”

Kelsi German:
“Me and Cody crossed the bridge and were looking in the woods, and we couldn’t find them anywhere. That’s when I started to realize that something was really wrong.”

Mike Patty:
“I didn’t realize the urgency of it. You know, it was like okay Libby’s not answering the phone or either it went dead. Or she’s out running around with a bunch of kids, you know, doing whatever. But, I did wrap up and came straight there. I started walking the trails, as well. And then I called the police and literally within minutes—when I said hey, we got a situation here, we need some help—I got back on the trails and started walking back up towards the Freedom Bridge. And by the time I got to the Freedom Bridge, I ran into two officers that was out there walking it as well. So, they reacted, you know, just really quick. And, uh, continued to walk on the trails and then ended up meeting Becky back up at the police station at some point, cause I knew Becky was there.”

Mike Patty:
“We were around town looking. Flash lights were lit up looking up and down in alleys and streets. We went all around looking and went back out to the trails. And as the night progressed, went back up to the police—I think I dropped Becky off. I think her and Kelsi were going through some of the social media stuff—trying to look at computers, or iPads, or iPods, or anything we had, trying to look for any information."

DTH:
“When did you become aware of the Snapchat photos?”

Becky Patty:
“It was that evening. I think Kelsi’s the one who showed me because I didn’t have SnapChat. Because she had gone on to work and then we had to call her back. And so, I think she saw it and she said well I do know this. So, we had seen it while we were at the police station. It was that night.”

DTH:
“What did you think of those two images—the image of the bridge and the image of Abby on the bridge?”

Becky Patty:
“Well, at the time, the only one I saw was the one of Abby on the bridge. So, I-I-I didn’t, so I knew they were at least on the bridge, and you know, over. So, uh, I don’t remember what I thought. I just know that okay they were there; we need to be—we need to be searching from there. Cause we know they were at least that far.”

DTH:
“And when you called police, how did you call—was that a 9-1-1 call?”

Mike Patty:
“No, I called the sheriff’s department directly.”

Tobe Leazenby:
“It was right around 5 o’clock that evening. One of my detectives sent me a text and said ‘hey sheriff, we have two girls missing that are part of—that live in the county and they were last seen just out of Delphi near the High Bridge.’ I honestly was not overly concerned in the beginning because—for a number of years, any time we’ve had a report of a runaway or even a missing senior citizen—I would guess, percentage wise, we’ve probably found or located those runaways or seniors, uh, I’d say 90-95% of the time. And, so that initial thought entered my mind. I thought, well okay we’ll find ‘em. You know, we’ll find ‘em and everything will be fine.”

Darryl Sterrett:
“I deployed people and trucks to different areas. We didn’t know where to look in the initial—they were just missing. So, kinda deployed people to different areas looking for the girls. Driving up and down the street, checking maybe friend’s houses, um, just putting more boots on the ground and doing what we could. And once the guys got out of the station, I was called to the sheriff’s office and we had set up a joint incident command.”

Shane Evans:
“I drove the 25 to 35 minutes up to Delphi [from a meeting]. I can’t remember—I know I talked to the fire department. I went to the jail, talked to some of the dispatch units, some of the city units, um. At one point, I went out there when the fire department was searching for the girls, at that point. Um, got some equipment available. We have—the waste water department has—I wouldn’t call it a 4-wheeler—it’s something bigger than a golf cart and smaller than a Gator. Um, so we made that available to county and city units that were working that night, if anything came up.”

Darryl Sterrett:
“At this point, we started getting a sense of urgency. Now mind you, it’s pitch black. We focused on the creek. We focused on the road side. We focused on everything we could with what we had. We tried to ping the cellphone, and the information that we got was—okay, the cell phone pinged off of this tower. What does that mean? Well, it could be within a two mile radius of this tower. And so okay, I said we need to search all of Delphi, which then includes Deer Creek, the Wabash—I mean, two miles out is a good ways.”

Tobe Leazenby:
“Of course, that particular day was, um, unseasonably warm. But as-as it drew closer to evening, it began to feel a little bit cooler that evening, obviously. And so, being near a stream, the Deer Creek, the temperature of the water during that time period was obviously cold. You know, we have that. Rough terrain, so to say. Very, very rural part of—even though it’s just outside of the city limits—you know, immediately it turned into a very remote terrain area. Um, obviously there’s hills and valleys, and things like that out there.”

Darryl Sterritt:
“In that evening, we could’ve had at many as 100 people searching easily. And as you knock on this neighbor’s door and say hey, then they join the search. And, so the entire town was searching, in their own way. That’s part of being in a small town. Everybody knows everybody, and if you don’t know ‘em, you know of ‘em. And, everybody wants to help. So, we looked, and we looked, and we walked. We were focused on the bridge area, and we had people on 4-wheelers. We had farmers in the area; the community was looking. We searched until maybe 11:30-12:00. And, I had met up with the sheriff and discussed with him—and Chief Mullin—I said look, we have—we have blanketed this area. I honestly think we could probably check it off. And he said, well yeah I agree. And, you know, at some point you have to do that.”

Erica Gibson:
“Everybody was checking different trails in Delphi just to make sure. So, we came up here and we were back there, and we even saw the firefighters back there. And, um, like we talked to them for a while, and then, um, they called off the search. And, so we went home. But, I’m glad we did as I texted Kelsi right before—and I’m like hey I know you guys checked around the bridge, but I know other people have to. Do you need those extra eyes? Kinda glad we didn’t, you know. We were two of Libby’s best friends—the other person with me was one of Abby’s—and so I’m kinda glad we didn’t.”

Cynthia Rossi:
“I think when they started mentioning the police bringing in dogs from Chicago—cause I know—because I know from living there—that a lot of bad things happen there. And, they always have just certain systems set up if something is to go wrong. And it’s a very professional city when it comes to crime and dealing with crime, and they have everything you could ever imagine when it comes to dealing with that sort of thing. So when somebody said they were bringing in dogs from Chicago, I was like oh they’re going to other states—they’re contacting people all across the world to try to find them—that isn’t a good sign.”

Erica Gibson:
“Definitely worried that night—cause I went ahead and stayed with another friend that night because we were going to go to school in the morning. I was terrified; she wasn’t so much. A friend we Facetimed was, but like, they were only terrified because if they’re still out there, they’re cold. They’re scared if one of them’s hurt, and really we just thought they really were just lost and scared.”

Darryl Sterrett:
“I’ve heard good and bad. On that comment—I guess I will say that it was a joint decision that I consulted with many, many emergency response leaders in our community. And so, at some point, I guess what I will—the way I will put it is the organized effort by emergency services was temporarily called off, yes. But, there were still people I know out even though they were not necessarily under out leadership. I’ll—I’ll put it that way.”

DTH Producer:
“Just for people who may be wondering why, you know what was sorta the calculus and the rationale behind that decision?”

Tobe Leazenby:
“The search at that point had obviously not been fruitful. The other thing that was limited at that time were very limited resources. And when I say--basically additional lighting is one thing that came to mind that we didn’t have access to. At least, again, at those hours. And, so um, I would—as I recall, I think a lot of it boiled down to the availability of resources and being able to continue on.”

Darryl Sterrett:
“We were at High Bridge. We had walked High Bridge. And we had walked under High Bridge—had guys climb down to the top of the pillars of High Bridge. I had guys doing things they should have not been doing, but we were going to find something. We had scoured the banks of the creek, the hillsides—the way, you get to a point where, you know, that you’ve walked over two, and three, and four times in that area. You kind of feel like you have to put a checkmark on it. So, we had come to that point. And, it’s like I said, it was a tough thing to do, but as a volunteer department you also have to look out for the individuals that you command. Because they have jobs, they have livelihoods. That’s the tough part of it it because, as a chief, you have to be able to look out for them at some point. And they would stay out there until sunup if you told them that’s what you were doing, but at some point you have to be realistic. We have turned every rock we could think of in this area, and that time of year, you know, the ground cover isn’t now—where you’ve got weeds four foot tall, you know. You could see a good ways even in the dark. We have, of course, we have lights like no other. So, we came to that point where we need to check this spot off and maybe look at coming back fresh in the morning. Let’s see what happens.”

Darryl Sterrett:
“[the following morning] I had a couple come in to do nothing but just register volunteers. I know we were at 300, and then the people that freelance and don’t check in. So, we had people and people and people. Got a call up from Tippecanoe County, offered up a mobile operation center. Uh, and we brought it in and set it up at the bridge area, so that we could more readily coordinate people in that area. And, we covered everything that we had covered the night before, but we covered it in daylight and we covered it with twice as many people.”

Kelsi German:
“The next morning, we all got up—me and my grandma—got up and left about 7:30-ish. And, everybody met up at the fire station. And the fire department separated us into groups, and my family actually all got separated. My grandma and aunt Tara were in one group, and I was in another group with my dad, and my other sister, and a few other people. And my group got sent to High Bridge.”

Todd Ladd:
“I contacted the sheriff who attended my church and asked him where do you want me. He asked me to come down to the command center. So, my role at the command center was basically to talk with people as they came in, as they volunteered. I signed in as a volunteer, of course. But, more to be just connecting, listening, talking to first responders, looking at maps wondering—even spent about an hour with another clergy friend, went and searched another area of the creek and behind some houses, just going over areas that had been checked but wanted to check once again. Many, many people were wanting to come out—even people from other communities nearby. The Logansport, the Frankfort, the Monticello, as well. But, of course, you saw a lot of people that you know because you know many people in this community.”

DTH:
“So, is your mood on Tuesday morning different than it was on Monday night when you were out at the scene?”

Todd Ladd:
“Mood Tuesday morning is like something’s not right.”

Darryl Sterrett:
“So, we had helicopters up, they were searching the creek. We had kayakers on the creek, 'cause some of those areas, you’re not gonna see except for from the water. So, the terrain is rough when you get off of the trail system. For this area, if it’s not a cornfield, it’s a creek bed. So, even on foot in the daytime, it-it was tough to search.”

Tobe Leazenby:
“Obviously, as time continued to go along, I again had that thought in my mind about—ok this isn’t like majority of what we end up with in this county, being able to find individuals. Yeah, at some point I thought, okay yeah I’m not real sure about this one.”

Kelsi German:
“We heard somebody yell up the hill that they found a shoe. And, at the moment, I knew exactly what they were wearing. I couldn’t remember what the sweatshirt was my sister was wearing until later, but I knew exactly what shoes they were wearing. And so they yelled up that it was a black Nike, and I knew that it was Libby’s. And then about thirty seconds later, somebody else said that they’d found them.”

Tobe Leazenby:
“I’ll never forget this part, unfortunately. I know Chief Steve Mullin and I—and I believe the Delphi mayor Shane Evans—um, Fire Chief Sterrett, we were kinda in the back part of the fire department. And, I remember I believe it was Chief Mullin got a call—said we’ve located them, uhhh, and they’re, you know, no longer with us.”

Darryl Sterrett:
“Because of the number of people, we wanted to get authorities to the site before we put out any blanket notice. So, we kinda played coy to protect the people, to protect the scene, um, to protect the family. So, we kinda went downstairs and played coy, and we were waiting to give notice. We wanted the family to not find out from anyone but authorities. Course, then you get people saying we heard this, we heard that. Sometimes you’ve got to lie to people to protect themselves, I’m sorry. Tell them “well you’ve heard more than we know,” and at some point, uh, I believe it was Steve Mullin came down and said we have the scene secured. Let’s go ahead and let people know, so we can terminate—lets get people out of here. I made the announcement that the girls had been found and it was not to a good end, and I thanked everybody that was there. I tried to be that guy, that when all else is tumbling down, somebody’s gotta keep it together. And, when I made the announcement, the entire lot was full of people and there’s a stream of state trooper cars going by, and it’s just surreal. I knew where they were going and I knew what they were facing.”
 
Down the Hill: Delphi
Episode 2 – The Day Delphi Changed


Individuals interviewed in this episode:
Doug Carter – Indiana State Police Superintendent
Mike & Becky Patty – Libby’s grandparents and legal guardians
Tobe Leazenby – Carroll County Sheriff
Kim Riley – Indiana Police Sargent
Anna Williams – Abby’s mother
Carrie Timmons – Libby’s mother
Darryl Sterrett – Delphi Fire Chief

DTH: What did you see when you got out here that day?

Superintendent Doug Carter:
Well, there was a lot happening at that time. There was, uh, still a huge, huge response in the local community—which, by the way, is just an extraordinary place. Umm, there was a flurry of law enforcement activity from agencies all over, as people would expect. And, uh, as we’ve come to expect internally.

[Long pause] And, I could just see the complexity on people’s faces and in their comments. And, the way they looked. And, the way they acted. And, the way they walked. And, [clears throat] because it-it-it rocked this community.

And, remember, it was on the heels of the Flora fire that killed those four little girls in Flora. In the same county, in the same rural county. And, uh, the middle of America, ya know? So—


DTH: It’s a lot of tragedy.

Superintendent Doug Carter:
A lot of tragedy, a lot of sadness, a lot of hurt, pain, and sorrow. Um, and I knew we were going to have a heavy burden. I just knew we were going to have a heavy burden.

Um, part of that was because of what the expectations would be—coordinating an event, an investigation this—that’s this complex. Um, I had a lot spinning around in my mind. Personally, in my mind. But, as I looked around and I saw what was happening, I knew we were up for the task.



PART ONE: WE DIDN’T WIN THIS ONE


Mike Patty:
They may have found the girls, ya know, out near the High Bridge. So, I immediately got—went and jumped in my truck and drove straight out there. That’s when I come up on Becky, and most of my family was already there. And, uh, it wasn’t good. It wasn’t good.

Um, we all knew… at that point that they’d been found. But, ya know, because of—we had some friends that were actually in a search party that found ‘em, and uh, I talked to him a little bit. And, uh, they’d been found.


It’s almost like disbelief, you know. You don’t want to believe this. I remember getting Becky and saying okay it’s no good for us here. I remember leaving, and stopping and seeing some friends of mine, who were in search parties, just lined up along the road.

And then, when I talked to the buddy of mine who was in the search party that found ‘em—you know, um, something horrible had happened. I knew that. Let’s put it that way.


DTH:
When you heard they were found, how did your mind process that? What did you think must’ve happened?

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
Well, being—yeah, you’re right—being that close to a-a stream that can be unpredictable something, uhh, you know, and not having those initial answers. You know, we’re thinking okay, did they drown? Where specifically were they found? You know, all those types of questions that hadn’t been answered at that point.

Ya know, and of course, being in law enforcement we had to—at least in our minds—have that thought run through our minds. Like okay, you know, were they—was there criminal activity afoot here? So, yeah, there was just a large amount of various unanswered questions at that stage.


DTH:
And when did you find out that this looks like foul play?

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
It wasn’t long after that initial call, actually. Um, I’m gonna say within—as I recall—within the hour of getting the initial one. And, um, just put a whole different twist on the whole scenario for us at that stage.

DTH:
And, what does that do to these men gathered at the firehouse? You said that with that first call, it could—you could hear a pin drop. As it becomes known that this was looking like a crime, is it still quiet?

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
As I recall, yes. I think that—again that first hour, to allow it to—to allow it to set in. I think that first hour, yes. There was—for me it was disbelief—but, eventually, not long after that our instincts and our training kicked in, and we went into, uh, investigative mode.

And, I know if I were to put out that call. Or Doug Carter—or even the FBI—were to put out that call, okay we need this, this, and this. You know, um, someone’s gonna respond to us because that’s the way our profession works.

Superintendent Doug Carter:
And, I received a call that the two girls had been found. I didn’t know who they were exactly at the time. Umm, I immediately left. I immediately left downtown Indianapolis and drove to Delphi—to the crime scene.

And, we had a significant response there. We had aviation assets on their way. Uh, everything, every kind of specialty that the ISP has to offer to the local community. So, we responded, uh, with all we had.


Sgt. Kim Riley:
On the way up, I was making calls to some of our investigators trying to find out what they knew, and basically—most of ‘em—hadn’t even gotten to the scene either.

When you realize that the state police post is about 30 minutes away from that location, I realized that most of them were probably running with lights and siren to get up there as soon as possible. ‘Cause it was an emergency situation. It was—here we’ve got two girls that’ve been murdered. We didn’t know how. We didn’t know why. We didn’t have any answers at that point and time.


Anna Williams:
They believe that they have found the girls, and they’re not with us. And, um [laugh], I remember after that, um, I was so upset because the last three years that she had been at church camp, she’d kept asking to get baptized. And, I said no I want you to do it when we’re all together as a family. And, that was the first thing I said—I said “never got it done!” He’s [her pastor] like, “Anna, your daughter gave her heart to the Lord and she’s with him today. And, you know that.”

And, from that
moment on, head to toe, it went whoosh! And, I just knew no matter that my girl’s okay, and I’ve stayed with that. That this is temporary.

Carrie Timmons:
And my brother called me, and he said “Carrie, I’m seeing some really disturbing things on Facebook.” So, my brother says you need to call Becky, and I refused. It was a flat no—no I’m not, nuh un, I’m not calling her. I think now that was like—if I don’t call her, it’s not true.

So, I called Kesli. [Laugh] I don’t know why in my mind that was any different, but I called Kelsi. She didn’t answer, so I kept calling. I probably called her ten times, no answer. And, so I had jumped in the car and I was on my way to the gas station. Fine. If they’re not gonna call me, I’m going. I’m on my way. And, I was probably four or five blocks from the gas station when my phone rang, and it was Kelsi’s number that popped up.


So, I’m expecting—when I answer the phone—to hear Kelsi say mom we found her! And, uh, it was Derrick. And, Derrick and I hadn’t really talked much at that point. Um, so it was kind of a shock for him to be on the phone. And he said, “Carrie they found the girls.” And, I had like a split second of “oh, thank God”, but he didn’t say anything else. So, I said, “are they okay?” He’s like, “no”.

And at that point, I think I was like prime—primal evil—just came out of me, screaming no. And I said, “are they alive?” And he said, “no”. And I don’t know how I made it to the gas station ‘cause I was just hysterical. People were staring at me, and I just wanted it to disappear. I wanted it to all go away. I pulled up on the wrong side of the gas pump, and here I was outside of the pump screaming—why can’t I get the nozzle in the thing—because it wasn’t even there.


Becky Patty:
A friend of ours was also in a search group that was across the creek, and he saw something. So, he took his phone and zoomed in, and it was a tie-dyed shirt. And he knew what Libby wore. And, uh, his wife she come back and she said they found the girls.

Well, I was kinda excited at first, you know, and then it hit me. I said, “are they okay?” She wouldn’t answer. So, I knew that they found them. So, we hurried and jumped in our cars up the trailhead, and one of the officers was there.

I said, “you need to take me to Libby now. You need to take me, she’s gonna need me.” They wouldn’t let us go close. They wouldn’t take me, so that’s when he come up. He says, “we need to go to the truck.”

And, while we’re sittin’ in the truck, the coroner’s van come driving by. This is when you realize this is real. This isn’t a mistake that they’re really just hurt. And, uh, they couldn’t say it was them but everybody knew it was.


Fire Chief Darryl Sterrett:
Course, you have to stand like a stone, and you have to keep it together and tell 200 people we didn’t win this one. And I came back inside our little command circle downstairs, and uh, I had to go into our utility closet to collect myself—and again you’re only allowed so much time before you have to come back out, and be who you’re supposed to be and keep it together. Because if you lose it, then everybody around you is gonna lose it.

And, I waited because I knew my guys would be trickling back in eventually, and I did not want them to decompress in front of the public and I wanted to keep the public away from them. I didn’t know which of my guys had been to the scene, but I knew that they’d all been out there.


DTH: Was it your guys that found the scene?

Fire Chief Darry Sterrett:
I was told that it was a private citizen. That’s all I was told. But I know now—after the fact—that a couple of my guys had been there shortly after the discovery, and that’s why I wanted to be here when they came back. Because I know what they do when they’re stressed out, and I did not want that to happen with this much public that we had here. And, I wanted to keep them separate from the public. And the public mean no disrespect, they mean no harm. They don’t understand what these guys actually face, and if you touch that nerve, it happens.

So, a couple of my guys were trickling in, and one of my most loyal—hardened—that guy came in, and I put myself between him and the crowd. And he just kinda started talking and I said, “go over there on the side of the engine—go over there on the side of the engine.” He went over there to the other side of the engine, which I had roped out just for them. And, he started taking boots off and stuff and I just said—I don’t even remember what the comment was—but it eluded to the fact that it was not a good end. He didn’t know, and he—yeah.

It’s hard to see a guy that tough and that strong break down and just lose it, but these guys are all heart.



PART TWO – 300 FEET AWAY


Superintendent Doug Carter:
I had an immediate conversation with my boss, the governor of the state of Indiana—Eric Holcomb—and I knew he would say what he did—but anything that community needs, the answer is of course yes. The law enforcement response—the local law enforcement response—I knew that since it’s a very rural area, that it was going to require tremendous response from state police. I know what their limitations are—and it’s nothing against them. They’ve done the best they can and a really nice job, um, but they have two detectives, in the whole county. So, we jumped in.

Sgt. Kim Riley:
I saw a lot of people with blank looks on their face. People that are just wondering why would this happen or who would do something such as this. When I was talking to the officers that saw the scene and I was trying to get some information, they were looking the same way.

The way the girls were found, how they were found, what had happened to them. It was just a lot of things were going thru their minds and just trying to figure out the crime scene. Is it here? Is it there? How much of a crime scene do we have here? And that was one of the questions that was being discussed too, ya know. How big of a crime scene do we got? What are we dealing with? How much evidence do we have here to deal with?

Those are things that were going thru the minds—I know—the investigators, the crime scene technicians had already arrived, so they were starting to look at the crime scene to see what they could do.


DTH:
So, once the girls were found, there’s—you said—a couple hundred people had been out there looking for them. So, when the girls are found, you begin to secure off that area. What is that process like and how do you get those people out of there?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
Well, actually, we don’t want to get them too far out because we want to make sure and keep them, uh, close by. Because, first of all, we’ve got to interview them to see what they found, what they’d seen, get any pertinent information from them that we can get—their name, address, phone number. So, we can--later on if we need more information or if we need, you know, whatever from them. We can get that information from them, and basically, they all gave us a statement. Just basically protocol on any time of crime scene that somebody would walk up on.

And that’s basically what we did with the people that were there. And, then we just try to figure out what type of—how big is the crime scene gonna be. I mean, if you’ve never been there, you gotta remember we’re in Indiana—we’re in central Indiana—and the ravines are not deep here, but we do have ravines, small hills, and there was basically a creek that ran thru there—real close to the crime scene. It was down in the lower gully—I guess you’d call it—where the bodies were found. There was two hills on each side and plus one on the side of the—on the side of the creek.

So, you know, trying to figure out where did they come from, how did they get here, which way did the suspect, or suspects, go. Uh, those are all things they’re trying to figure out to see how large of a crime scene they gotta make.


DTH: And the crime scene begins on the bridge?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
Well, the crime scene originally started where we found the bodies because that was all the crime scene we knew at that point and time. As we found evidence, looked into things and found the phone, that’s when we actually realized that the crime scene did start at the bridge. So, now we have to back up even more to bring that bridge into—into the crime scene. So, now we’ve got it—we’re moving the crime scene a third of an acre. Now we’re talking—‘cause it’s—walking, it’s about a quarter of a mile from where the bodies were found to where the video was taken.

And so, trying to figure out—okay, well where did they walk? And you gotta remember, there were four or five hundred people that started looking for these girls the night before. So, you—you know—we had to deal with that because—



DTH: [speaking over Riley] So, there’s a lot of tracks.

Sgt. Kim Riley:
There’s a lot of tracks, cigarette butts. Believe it or not—this is kinda disgusting—but you had spit, people would urinate. I mean, uh, ‘cause people don’t have time to go back. So, they would hide in the woods to go to the bathroom, that kinda stuff. So, we had to deal with all that.

And most people don’t even think of things like that, but when you’re trying to process a crime scene—you gotta remember—it was spring of the year—or late winter—in February, you’ve got all the leaves on the ground. We had, basically, to turn every leaf over from the crime scene all the way up the whole thing. And I don’t mean we turned every one, but I mean—it was just that dramatic of a crime scene. That’s what took so long.


Superintendent Doug Carter:
That was a bit of a challenge—to take a step back from this. We brought in, I think maybe five or six crime scene technicians. And our job at that point was to build a fence around them—not a literal one, one figuratively—and do everything we need to do to support them. The crime scene was very complicated.

DTH: Compared to other investigations you do…

Superintendent Doug Carter:
Well, I think it’s become commonly known that it includes, um, the Monon High Bridge. Um, it includes the-the-the trailhead. We’ve been there—it’s a cool little bridge to sit on and reflect, if you haven’t been there.

So, everywhere from the trailhead on. That’s all I can say about the crime scene.


DTH: Are you confident that you’ve recovered everything that could’ve been recovered there?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
I believe we’ve done the best we could do. I’m not gonna say we didn’t miss anything. I mean, we’re human beings. We’re going to miss things, but overall—I mean, the way they did it—one guy would check over someone else’s work to see if there was anything that they felt that they missed. And so, I mean, it wasn’t just one crime scene technician doing this. Our people were there. We had other departments that had people there. It was a joint effort in collecting this.

And, there was people that come in after that just to make sure we covered everything. We started at sunrise and didn’t quit until way past nine, ten o’clock. So, it wasn’t like they didn’t—weren’t there. And then we had guards or other troopers from the sheriff’s department that would help secure the scenes when they were gone, so that we didn’t have somebody walking in and trying to get pictures or do something—I mean, it was well secured.


DTH: What is going thru your head as you’re out there?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
Well, I didn’t go up to the crime scene. There was one ridge you could actually go to, and I stood on that ridge and I could see the crime scene—and it was still two to three hundred feet away from me. I could see the crime scene but I didn’t feel—first of all, I didn’t want to go to the crime scene—I didn’t want to be somebody that would contaminate something. And that-that-that’s one of the things—why we keep people out.

But just looking at those two young girls just laying there on the ground, um, it just brought memories of my daughters when they were that age and how I would feel if I was their father. It was very emotional for me. And like I said, I didn’t know their parents at that time, but I knew a lot of people in Delphi and a lot of people that were in the search party. I knew a lot of those people. But it’d been—like I said—probably 15, 20 years since I’ve been there. So, it was kind of—I don’t want to use the word reunion—but it was a time where I could—they would interact with me, and I was able to interact with them. Just to try to kinda get their feelings—what their feelings were and what I was going through.

And, I was from a small town also. So, knowing how a small town works in central United States made a big difference on how I reacted and how I was feeling what—could feel their pain but not know their pain, if that makes sense. And, uh, that was tough knowing that.


Sgt. Kim Riley [at the press conference announcing the two bodies were found]:
Basically, we’re gonna make this—it’s going to be short and sweet. We don’t have that much at this point and time. Uh, basically what we’ve got, uh, we have found two bodies in Deer Creek about a mile east of town. Um, we are investigating this as, uh, a crime scene. We, uh, suspect foul play. Uh, we have not made positive identification of the two bodies, so we’re not going to be releasing any information on them at this point and time. Uh, we’ve got, uh, the Indiana State Police is assisting the Carroll County Sheriff’s Department and the, uh, Delphi City Police Department, uh, in the investigation here. We’ve also got the FBI investigation group here out of Indianapolis.

And one thing the family asked us to do is to thank all the communities around Delphi, and the people here of Delphi, who were assisting in attempting to locate these, um, the two young children that were missing earlier. They just want to say thank you to those people and thank you—they just wanted to express their gratitude towards the hard workers in helping search for these children.



PART THREE – ALLOWED TO BE ANGRY


Teachers and classmates talk about their reactions to the news and how they processed the information; a mom talks about how she shared the news with her daughter and how difficult it was to tell her daughter that her friends were killed in an attack; Becky and Mike Patty talk about how that time [after learning the girls had been murdered] is still very much a blur.

Fire Chief Darryl Sterrett:
[worried about his men] That, uh, night—or afternoon, whatever. I told the guys—I said, “just go home, be with your families Decompress a little bit. Come back tonight; we’ll have beer and pizza. Don’t take this home.” And, we had a few guys come back.

It isn’t about talking what you’ve seen or where you’ve been. It’s just—sometimes—it’s too early to go to those quiet moments. I think there’s a point where it’s too early to bring in the professionals to talk about it. I’m not saying you can heal it yourself, but the first thing, you know, I feel—I would lose so much respect if my guys had come in and there was some doctor standing there that they didn’t know. We needed to be together, and that’s what we did.


DTH: Like a family.

Fire Chief Darryl Sterrett:
Yes, and the guys -- “yeah, yeah we’re fine… thanks for the beer and pizza.” You know, we talked and chatted it out. Probably didn’t talk about the scene one—one time. Maybe a question of this or a question of that. And, I felt that was good. That if they wanted to talk about it, that’s why we were there. If you don’t want to talk about it, I know better than to try to make ya. I knew there would be a time when we would have the professional. That day—that evening was not it.

So, we did that, went home, and late evening—10:30, 11 o’clock, I get a phone call from—I think—Chief Mullin wanting to know if we can send some equipment out to the scene to assist the-the-the state police and FBI and whoever—whoever. There’s so many people out here at that point to assist with the scene and investigation. After standing on concrete for two days straight, I couldn’t get up off the couch. My back was done.

I made phone calls to a couple—you can’t just send anybody, you gotta send the right people because you didn’t—you didn’t want to send them into the scene. And, I thought I expressed that with Chief Mullin and I sent three—three or four of my guys to take care of it. I felt horrible I couldn’t do it myself, but I physically could not walk. And so, they went that evening and assisted with the crime scene. I think they were there until mid-morning, I don’t know.


DTH: You’re out there for several hours, what did you do next?

Superintendent Doug Carter:
Drove. Took the long way home. I’ve got the—my wife is just awesome. Um, she’s incredibly supportive and understanding. And, um, I knew this one was going to be different and I just—I called her and said I, uh, get a couple—three cups of coffee, probably. I’m gonna go and take the long way. So, I did. I just drove by myself for a while.

DTH: Did you listen to music?

Superintendent Doug Carter:
Nope. Total silence. I’ve often thought about that silence actually. Because, normally, it’s not like that. At the time, I wondered if I need to still done—do what I do [long pause], yeah.

DTH: Do you still ask yourself that?

Superintendent Doug Carter:
Nope [long pause], not to me anymore, no.
 
Down the Hill: The Delphi Murders
Episode 3 — A Picture and A Search Warrant


At the beginning of the podcast, there is a short discussion about the two Snapchat photos. The snaps have already been discussed at great length here, and there’s nothing new or noteworthy to add from this discussion.


Sgt. Kim Riley:
Basically, we have identified the bodies, uh—uh, of the two, um, females that were found on yesterday. Yesterday—or, uh yeah, yesterday. Uh, the bodies are, uh, have been positively identified by as Abigail J. Williams, 13, of the Delphi area and Liberty Rose Lynn German, 14, of the Delphi area. The two girls were reported missing on Monday, February 13th; the bodies were discovered about 12:15 on the 14th, in the woods just east of town here. My volunteers that helped search of the children after they were reported missing to the Sheriff’s Carroll County police department.

Family has been notified. This is considered a double homicide investigation. We are asking for anyone to come forward who has information—that were either on the Delphi Historic Trail yes—there on Monday, especially if they were near the Monon High Bridge. That they might’ve seen—seen somebody out there, they may have taken pictures where somebody might be in that photograph. If they were out there doing that kind of stuff we need that information. We would love to have pictures of that—more to just clarify what we’ve got going on out there.

Reporter: Is there anybody else out there in the community?

Sgt. Kim Riley: I’m sorry—what was that?

Reporter: Is there a threat out there to anybody else in the community?

Sgt. Kim Riley: I’ll let you answer that.

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby: At this time we do not believe so, sir.

Reporter: Does that mean you have a person of interest in custody or a suspect?

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby: We—we do not, sir.

Reporter: Can you tell us the cause—the manner of death that the autopsy uncovered?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
No, we cannot do that at this time because of the investigation still in its baby steps, so to speak, and we don’t want to put that information out yet.

Reporter:
Can you describe for us the scope of the investigation? The resources, the people, what’s going on with the investigation?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
The Carroll County Sheriff’s Department is the lead investigation. They also—they’ve asked us to help. The Delphi Police Department is assisting, uh. We have the FBI—what’s called their ERT Team, which is the evidence, uh, collection team that is here. Um, they’re also providing other resources. At this time, we have not put all of it together yet.


HLN News Anchor Jean Casarez:
[News Report] We are following breaking news tonight out of Indiana. Someone has murdered two girls. One just thirteen-years-old, the other fourteen. And in their search for information, they’re trying to locate anyone who was in the wooded area at the time, including a male subject seen on these photographs. They were just released minutes ago by the Indiana State Police. They say they would like to ask this person what he might have seen.

The ISP said the photos, “appear to depict a white male wearing blue jeans, a blue coat/jacket, and a hoodie”.


Superintendent Doug Carter:
All I’ll say is that we’ve had a lot of work done on that photograph.

DTH:
And you can’t make that better for the public?

Superintendent Doug Carter:
No.

DTH:
Can I ask when you look at that do you see a hat? Do you see hair? Do you see a hood? Do you know?

Superintendent Doug Carter:
Yeah, I mean—I do. I do. And again, I’m not—a long time ago—I don’t look at the head anymore. I look at everything else that we know about this person—not what we think. What do we know about this person? We know what his body looks like. We know how he walks, how he talks.

DTH:
When did this really start—this case really start to get the media attention outside of this area?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
I’m gonna say late that night or early the next morning. ‘Cause we started to get—believe it or not—the BBC showed up out of New York. I had a couple of other reporters were here. I was getting phone calls from other countries. It was just starting to snowball.

I mean, I’ve dealt with national news on other—on other things—but not to the way this was. And it was just a whole new experience for me, and I—it was time to call in some help for me. And I had some great other PIOs—just that came and assisted me and backed me up. Where I would be doing one thing, they would be doing something else behind the scene. So, it was—it was nice to know that I had that kinda help. For the first month or so, it just—it just continued and interest just keep growing and growing.

DTH:
Why do you think there’s that interest?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
I think once we kinda got out of what happened, and the information that we did put out there, it just—I know at first we didn’t put a whole lot out there. And there was reasons, ya know.

You don’t throw your three aces on the ground when you’re looking for the fourth one in the card game. And, ya know, that was kinda what we were trying to do—is hold all the information in that we could, uh, but yet still feed the media as much as we could.


And I know there’s a fine line between those two, and it was—and there was a couple times where it, uh, I probably said something I should’ve not said. But, it was just one of those things where it was just harder to hold it back. And, uh, I always conferred with my lead detectives. Um, both in the sheriff’s department, and—and our guys, and with the FBI.

When we did do news conferences or when we did—when they knew I was getting this information and was getting ready to put it out, I always ran it by them before—most of the time before. There were times when I could not do that, but 90% of the time I tried to run everything by them before, uh, I talked to the media. Because I didn’t want to say something that was gonna jeopardize or hurt the investigation.

So, I mean, it was a—it was a fine line on what we were doing, but we tried to do the best we could with the information that we could put out there.


Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
This is that sudden swarming, if you will, that’s occurred in our community. Where, ya know, whether it was law enforcement, media, ya know, uh, the governor himself. You know, coming on board. Just, uh, just the overwhelm—the initial overwhelming feeling.

You know, I’ll never forget, um, where we currently are—down at the Delphi City Building—um, [laugh] it was kind of like watching a little beehive. I mean, with all these investigators in and out of the door all the time with a file in their hand and going to follow [up] on whomever. Ya know, I remember seeing that first couple days around the—ya know, once we were organized, around the clock. I mean, there were many a nights I was up there ’til maybe one or two in the morning and still seeing guys in and out of the door all the time, following [up] into things.


HLN News Anchor Jean Casarez:
[News Report on February 16, 2017]: We do have information to report. The Indiana State Police are serving a search warrant at a home in Delphi. This is in response to information that the police received through tips and through interviews giving probable cause to search the home. No word on whether there have been any arrests at this hour.

We do want to begin with Lindsey Eaton. She’s a reporter for CBS for Fox 59 in Indianapolis. Lindsey, you are at the scene tonight. Tell us what you’ve seen with the executing of this search warrant at a home.


Fox59 Reporter Lindsey Eaton:
Correct, correct. We’ve been out here for about an hour. State police did issue a search warrant at this home. Within the past hour, some of the authorities have left. There are still quite a large presence of authorities out here. We have seen detectives bringing out some boxes from this home.

There’s a field next-door to this home. We saw detectives with flashlights looking through the field. Um, at this point, the latest we have heard—no arrest has been made. Troopers in the area—Sgt. Riley actually just told us about an hour ago that they don’t anticipate any arrests to be made but this was part of following up on a tip that they received. And they—he said it’s just another piece of the puzzle. They’re following up on each and every tip.

HLN News Anchor Jean Casarez:
Lindsey, I want some more detail here. How many boxes have you seen authorities take out tonight? Have they taken anything other than boxes? Any carpeting, any mattress, anything?

Fox59 Reporter Lindsey Eaton:
We have not, we have not. We saw maybe just a couple—like I said we got here around 7 o’clock. We saw maybe a couple boxes taken from the home. I think there was either no crime tape around the house. Um, there are a few authorities still out here. They were searching the field next door. We saw them going around the house, up in and out of the front door, and that’s about it at this point.


HLN News Anchor Jean Casarez:
[Later that evening speaking with Sgt. Kim Riley on the phone] Okay, so you went to a judge and a judge signed off on this warrant. Why did you select this home in Delhi?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
Through the investigation with the tips, and the uh, interviews we had. We had probable cause, uh, to go into the house and do a search on it.


Prosecutor Robert Ives posted the following statement on Facebook on February 16, 2017 [per the Lafayette Courier & Journal]:
Please do not harass, bother, or accuse anyone. There are no charges pending against anyone as a result of the pending investigation. No one at the home searched is suspected of committing any crime. Please, please leave these people alone and let the police work.

The podcast then speaks with a legal expert about how unusual it is for LE to come up empty after executing a search warrant this early on in an investigation.

DTH spoke with Sgt. Kim Riley about this search warrant. He said it wasn't as significant to the investigation now, as it seemed to them that night. He said they went to the property thinking a suspect could be there. Apparently, the investigation revealed that wasn’t the case. He also said it wasn’t that important of an asset as it was that night.

[I'm not sure what Riley meant by “an asset” in this statement — that wasn't a typo; I just wanted to clarify that.]

DTH tried to gain access to the paperwork for the search warrant, but the ISP denied their request and cited the ongoing investigation.
 
Down the Hill: The Delphi Murders
Episode 4 — Three Words


Individuals interviewed for this podcast episode:
Doug Carter - Indiana State Police Superintendent
Tobe Leazenby - Carroll County Sheriff
Kim Riley - Indiana State Police Sergeant
Dave Burston - Former Indiana State Police Captain
Carrie Timmons - Libby's Mother
Anna Williams - Abby's Mother
Erica Gibson - Friend of Abby & Libby
Mike Patty - Libby's Grandfather/Guardian
Kelsi German - Libby's Sister

HLN News Report -- February 22, 2017
We do have breaking news tonight in the murders of two teenagers in Indiana. Liberty German and Abigail Williams went missing last week after going hiking. Their bodies were found the next day. And for the past week, we have been looking at this image--an image of a man officers call the prime suspect in the case.

And, new tonight--we are hearing for the very first time, three words muttered by a man in the vicinity of those two girls on that day.


DTH:
I want to go back to the video for a moment. Have you seen the whole video?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
Yes.

DTH:
Obviously, without telling us the parts that you don’t want to release, can you tell us what that’s like to watch that video?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
It was scary. Uh, I guess would be one way to put it. Just [pause] seeing, um, you know—seeing, just seeing the feelings that were going through the girls at the time. I’m not going to say which one, in particular. But, just knowing that—I, you know, just knowing what they knew is—is just, is just frightening for, uh, a 13- or 14-year old girl to know.

And, I-I just think, just—it kinda went through my mind for a long time, over and over again for a long time. Every now and then, I’ll think about it. But, uh, for the first six to eight months, I mean it was something I was going through for all the time. Uh, I mean, was just always think about it. It was just, uh, very heart wrenching for an adult to deal with, let alone a 13- or 14-year-old girl.

It was scary. Uh, it was, uh, I felt so sad there was nothing I could do. But, that—that’s the way it is, you know. Unfortunately, we’re not there for kids all the time, and sometimes they—bad things happen. And I guess that’s the only way I can explain it.


DTH:
Did you watch the video that early in the process?

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
As I recall, yeah. I would say it was just a matter of days, and when I say days I mean no more than a couple days into it that I had the opportunity to review it.

DTH:
And I know there’s stuff in that video that you’re not releasing publicly. Can you talk though a little bit about that process of watching that video and what that was like?

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
Um, [long pause] early on, like many of us in our leadership roles, and many have commented since then—I mean Mike Patty and I have even talked about it. But, [deep sigh] for Libby to have that mindset to be able to do what she did. In my mind, I thought, you know, she’s helping here. She’s telling us something. And it--obviously, as time went along, we found out what she was telling us.

And so, yeah, when I first saw that—I guess knowing that she’s at the age that she is at that point, I’m thinking she’s sharp. I mean, this is great. Ya know, and I—you know, all kudos to her for what she did there. Uh, I think it was, uh, definitely felt to be a huge asset in what we continue to do here and follow into this. And so, and I still feel like at the end of the day so to say, that it’s still going to be a plus to have that on board.

DTH:
When you heard the voice…

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
Um hmm.

DTH:
What went through your mind?

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
My initial thought was that, uh, it was satan’s voice himself. I’m a very spiritual man, so that was my exact thought—that that’s the devil himself speaking.

DTH:
Do you listen to people when you’re walking around town? When you’re sitting in restaurants? Are you listening for that voice?

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
Ahh, not so much during—right now, but yes in the beginning. And yet again, as we revisit—as more so my investigators and me, but, uh—when we revisit certain aspects, uh yeah. And there are times that I will go back—actually on my weekends that I’m at home sitting in my La-Z-Boy, I’ve been known to start up that audio again. And listen to it and go [whispered] “who is that?”


PRESS CONFERENCE | FEBRUARY 22, 2017

Superintendent Doug Carter:
[I omitted the portions of this statement that were transcribed in my Scene of the Crime notes.]

To the media, my gosh all I can say is to give you my sincere thanks. [Deep sigh] See, this isn’t like TV. There’s a perception that this can be solved very quickly. Everything we do can be solved very quickly, but this is a testament that it can’t and we need you. We’ve needed you since last week, we need you today, and we need you tomorrow. And likely will need the media across this nation. So, from a simple like me to you, I say thank you.

[Deep sign]

To the people dressed funny like me and those that represent the law enforcement profession, please understand we’re human beings just like you. I’d stand anywhere in the nation with the people standing behind me, and I would suggest to you that every time that something like this happens, a little piece of us dies as well. But, I also want you to understand how committed we are, as a collective one, and we will continue.

[Deep sigh]

I’ve had an opportunity to speak to my boss, Governor Eric Holcomb, about this situation. And every time I do, I see this look come over his face just like yours and this community’s. And that’s—that’s the unfortunate experience of experiencing evil. We’re not stopping.

[Deep sigh]

As poor as this picture is somebody knows. And if you’re watching, [long pause] we’ll find you. Who’s next? I hate to ask you that question, and I’d give my life to not have to. But I know you’ve asked yourself that very question. We must recognize that you see we’re all the same—we’re all human beings.

We must keep our resolve for Libby and Abby, for this community, and frankly to ensure that good trumps evil and it will. You’re going to hear more in just a minute about what we know. Do not discount the voice that you’ll hear. We will stay committed with resolve very rarely exhibited with human behavior until its conclusion. Please be patient. Become our partners and communicate with us as often as you can.

And now, from a very humble servant, this is the most blessed guy on this planet to represent the profession that I represent. To Abby and Libby, it’s my hope and my prayer that you’re now experiencing God’s promise of eternal peace.

DTH:
The down the hill—do you believe you know what hill that was that they went down?

Superintendent Doug Carter:
I believe it was right down there.

DTH:
And is that a steep heel? Is it a walkable hill?

Superintendent Doug Carter:
No, it’s [unintelligible]. It’s pretty rough terrain.


FEBRUARY 22, 2017 - PRESS CONFERENCE (cont’d)
At this time I would like to invite Captain Dave Burston, Chief Public Information Officer for the Indiana State Police to the podium.

Captain Dave Burston:
[Again, I have omitted the portion of this audio transcribed in my Scene of the Crime podcast notes.]

There’s enough there that somebody could recognize this person’s voice. And, as Superintendent Carter said, not to rationalize away. If you hear this today, and you think my God that sounds like fill-in-the-blank, call us. Make an anonymous tip. Tell us who you think it is. Let us investigate it.

If it’s not the right person, they’ll just be out of a little bit of time and they’ll be cleared, and they can go on and never know that you called. But you may tell us who the right person was, and you could be the person that helps us to solve this horrible crime.


The image that you see there of the suspect. That came from Liberty’s phone. I think many of you had speculated that before, and we weren’t prepared to discuss it at the time. We have more video; we’re not releasing it. It’s germane to our investigation. And it’s important that we spread that person’s voice far and wide for somebody that will recognize who that is and will call us and tell us.


DTH spoke with an Audio Forensics Expert to see what he could glean from the audio--could he detect an accent or regional dialect, for example. The expert said not much of anything could be obtained from a sample size this short.


FEBRUARY 22, 2017 - PRESS CONFERENCE (cont’d)
Captain Dave Burston answers a few questions from the press.

Is there any specific information that say the person is local or from far away?
No.

Could this be a stranger crime?
That’s a possibility.

Could this be somebody that knew that the girls were going to be there at that time?
That’s a possibility; nothing is off the table.

How long after Liberty posted to social media did this crime happen? Did the murders happen immediately after or was there time for someone to see them on social media and then meet them on that trail?
We know there are going to be lots of questions that we specifically cannot answer because there are things that we do not want to tip our hand to the person responsible for this. That kind of information we are keeping close to ourselves.

Is it reasonable to think—that’s an area—one of two things happened. This was a chance encounter--that’s possible. Don’t think it’s likely but it’s possible. Or that person knew that they were going to be there. That’s possible, as well. Those are things we’re looking into.



DTH reached out to the former Captain to clarify this statement--did he mean to imply that the girls were targeted.
*Burston is no longer a part of this investigation, as he retired from his position with the Indiana State Police in 2019. He is now an Information Officer for the Department of Corrections.


Burston told DTH that he wasn't saying the girls were targeted. He was simply saying at that point in the investigation -- in February 2017 -- investigators were looking at all options.

DTH then goes on to clarify the difference between a target and target of opportunity.


FEBRUARY 22, 2017 - PRESS CONFERENCE (cont’d)
Based on what you have, and what other investigators have at this time, do you believe this individual has killed before and what makes you believe he will do it again?
Uh, there has been no indication right now that—that this is part of a, uh, a serial murder, if that’s what your question is. Um, so, as of-as of the facts that we have collected at this point and time, we have not tied it to any other known homicides.

You played three words, [unintelligible]. Is there more?
We have other information that we’re not sharing. And specific to your question, Rafael, uh, keep in mind that there, uh, is likeliness of the possibility of, uh, more than one person.

Uh, we’re not saying that the person—that the voice that you heard is the same as this person here. This is all very complicated, very involved. And as much as we would like to tell you everything, more importantly, we want to solve the crime.


[Another officer—who is not mentioned by name—added]
But again, rest assured, we’re using our resources to put the person (and/or persons) that murdered Liberty German and Abigail Williams into our jail here in Carroll County.


Carrie Timmons:
The first time I heard it, it wasn’t cleaned up yet. It was at the press conference. I don’t know if anybody really remembers, but it was the very first time that recording was played. You couldn’t really understand what he was saying, and it was all “ruhhruhh”—like computerized sounding. And then, they were able to clean it up and suddenly it was DTH. And it was like, what the hell is he saying? Like why?

And I remember thinking it doesn’t even sound, like, urgent. He’s not yelling; he’s calm. Still to this day, it’s so eerie sounding to me. But I didn’t recognize it. It didn’t sound like anybody I knew—didn’t sound like anybody I had ever heard before or a phrase I had ever even heard anybody use before. Like, normally we like—just go—it wouldn’t like, it didn’t make any sense. So, that was weird.

I still wish—there are times I still wish I could hear more. But I don’t know how much more there is that I could handle hearing, so I don’t—I try not to think of what is actually going on when he says those words.


Anna Williams:
Every time something like that would happen I would hold my breath because part of you wants this over, and you hope you know who’s in that picture. And you hope you recognize that voice, and then the other part of you hopes you don’t. Because the idea that the person is most likely here or has lived here or somebody that I may have crossed paths with—whether I know who this person was or not or I knew them. It makes you ill, and that is probably one of the hardest things to move through life on. Until this person is caught, that every day there’s a potential of them crossing your path.

Erica Gibson:
She [Libby] knew something was up. She knew she had to do something. She probably didn’t even have service. So, she thought of the next thing she could, and I don’t think a lot of people do think of that. She didn’t know exactly what was gonna happen. I don’t even know if she knew the guy was bad.

Ya know, sometimes we joke around. Abby, um, when Abby was out with her mom and stuff, she would just take a photo and be like—joke around and be like, “that’s your boyfriend!” Or, you know, just joking around. And so like, it could’ve started out like as a joke like that.


DTH:
You guys would like, what? Text that to each other or Snapchatted?

Erica Gibson:
Well, um, we did those jokes on the volleyball bus mostly. Like she’d take a photo and then she’d show me. We never sent them, but like it could’ve been something like that, ya know. Like, knowing them—they’re skitzy people—always so goofy that she’s like, “oh, that person scares me!” Or stuff like that and that’s how she would act.

But I think it may’ve—they thought maybe it would’ve been funny or something like that. I don’t think that they ever thought—cause they get scared but to me it’s like a joking scared. So, that guy musta really, I don’t know—scared them to do that.


Kelsi German:
I don’t think that I knew the voice or the person that was in the video. But watching the video, I was overwhelmed that my sister was able to do something like that, and that she was able to know that something was gonna happen. It was also very sad to know that she knew that something was going to happen—enough to take this video.

Um, so, so many emotions are hitting me at once watching it that I don’t really know exactly what I was feeling. I just know that I was overwhelmed with so many emotions that I kind of—it was just shocking to me. I knew she was smart—I know she is smart, um, and she does that kind of stuff all the time, but it was crazy to think she was able to know before something happened—that she needed to do something.


DTH:
She’s been called a hero for that.

Kelsi German:
Yeah, um, and she is but I definitely think both of them are. I don’t think that one would’ve left the other. So, to me, Abby was my hero because she stayed with my sister. And, um, I love them both for that.

DTH:
Do you think that Libby took that video on purpose because she was concerned?

Carrie Timmons:
I think she got him in the video because she was concerned, but I don’t think that was her initial purpose in taking the video. Because it was my understanding that they were out there taking pictures and video anyway.

And like i’m learning now with younger girls, with Snapchat and all this other video social media, they do that crap all the time. Even if they’re just picking up a rock, they’re still taking a little video of it—which now I’m very thankful for but I didn’t get it at the time.

So, I think now, looking back, she probably wasn’t exactly videoing him. I think she left it on and made sure it was recording because she knew something was not right, but I don’t think that was the initial purpose. I could be completely wrong though; I haven’t seen or heard the entire video.


Mike Patty:
And I’ve been asked the question, ya know, that-that would’ve been Libby capturing that information. Ya know, and if things would’ve been different and the girls wouldn’t have been murdered, she would’ve come home and said “papaw, look at this”. This guy was out here really acting weird, what a strange guy, ya know. And would’ve shared that with me. I, I know that’s what she would’ve done and said this is a real weirdo out there. Of course, then we would’ve said no more trails, ya know.

That’s why she would’ve captured that. No doubt in mind, she would’ve come home and said look at this weirdo.

DTH:
Do you recognize anything in her video or the still they’ve released?

Mike Patty:
Unfortunately, no. I wish I could and I wish I could recognize that voice. I wish I could. I’ve racked my brain millions of times, a thousands and thousands and thousands of times. Um, still even to this day—thinking something’s gonna trigger and I’m gonna say, “yeah, I“—but no, I don’t.
 
Down the Hill: The Delphi Murders
Episode 5 — Signatures


Individuals interviewed in this episode:
Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives
Former FBI Profiler Mary Ellen O’Toole


DTH [speaking with Robert Ives]:
You were quoted as saying that the evidence or the crime scene was odd.
What do you mean by odd?



Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
Well, in one sense, any murder scene is probably odd. But again, this is where I have difficulty because I’m not sure what’s been released. There were a variety of things at the scene of the crime where I guess I would ask you to talk to the state police about that. They have to decide what is going to be released and what’s not going to be released.

It was just not—it was just not your normal “a person was killed here” crime scene. That’s probably all I can say about it.



DTH:
Maybe you could answer that in a more general way without being specific to this, this crime scene. We have our ideas about what a typical crime scene is — a person was shot in the head, the bullet casing is here. What in general to you would make it unusual or an odd crime scene?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives
I, I’ll follow along with your example.

The very first case I handled as prosecuting attorney back in 1987 and 1988 -- a fellow shot his wife in Deer Creek, Indiana. And, he pinned her up against the refrigerator, shot her in the back of the head. She fell on the floor, he shot her twice more in the chest. So, you had a dead person with three bullets in them. They were dead. Um, he was seen at the scene. You know, things like that.


All I can say about the situation with Abby and Libby is that there was a lot more physical evidence than that at the crime scene, and it’s probably not what you would imagine. What people will think I’m talking about... it’s probably not. And so, because of unique circumstances — which all unique circumstances of a crime are a sort of signature — you think, well this unusual fact might lead to somebody or that unusual fact might lead to somebody, and I wish I could tell you. But, again, that’s up to the state police.

There was nothing that seemed similarly identical that you’d think “well, this is modus operandi”. I don’t know if you’re familiar with the term -- modus operandi. Where sometimes criminals will use a, commit a crime in such a way that it’s so distinct that it acts as sort of a signature for them.



DTH:
Was there a signature in this crime? Like, like when you characterize something as a signature. Like without telling us what it is.



Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
I would say there were two or three things. Ah, I’d say at least three.



DTH:
Let me ask you Barb’s question in a different way.

Even if there aren’t any active cases out there that you could say "yeah, this" — are there any like -- just generally -- like famous, famous cases or famous murders that you can compare this to?



Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
Yeah, I’m not the best history of serial murders person. But, I will say this -- initially, I thought, I think most people thought, and I still think that it was probably somebody local. Because it’s just not a tourist spot. It’s just not somewhere where anybody would be lurking. It’s just such an unlikely place to be. You’ve all been there. It’s not that famous. It’s not like people come there and hang out and hope “well, maybe I’ll catch two girls here by themselves”.

I tend to think it’s a local. I still tend to think it was a local but a part of me also, as other people have speculated, thinks that maybe it was a random murder. Maybe it is, uh, uh, a serial killer. And it’s a horrible thing, but part of me hopes that well, they’ll catch somebody committing some other crime or having committed some other crime, and as it sometimes happened in the past, they’ll — serial killers — they’ll confess to this crime.

People ask me do I think it will be solved and I do think it will be solved -- because it’s so odd and so unusual, and people are so compelled to talk about the terrible things they do. I think that either this person will talk about it to someone, or alternatively, they will commit another crime, and get caught, and hopefully confess to this one. Either because they want the fame, or alternatively, because they’re trying to make a deal. So, I don’t know. I’m not an expert on the investigation of serial killers.



DTH:
If this person does act again — that is something that Superintendent Carter asks at the press conference — ya know, who’s next? Uh, he said he asks himself that all the time. Do you think that those signature items would still exist?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
[Sigh] I think potentially that one or two of those things could pop up again, yes.


DTH:
Have you seen the video?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
Yes.


DTH:
What we’ve been told by, by Sheriff Leazenby and Kim Riley — they haven’t told us how long it was, they haven’t told us too much about what was on it -- but they’ve told us what it was like for them to watch it and their current relationship. You know, they still go back to it. What, how would you describe your thoughts about it?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
Well, there’s two things about it and I think this is pretty well understood now. But, in the early days, people would always question -- “well, why don’t they enhance this?” And I would explain to people, “it’s a still frame from a video, on a cell phone camera, where he’s not fully in the frame.” So, there’s very few pixels making up the video of this fella. That’s why it’s so blurry. The best people I, I’m aware of, did their best but there’s only so much you can do. You can only have so much data.


The audio is unbelievably good considering the circumstances. You’re outdoors and people are fairly far away — though he was pretty close when they probably got that audio. There’s, there’s just, there’s less additional information that I think people would think there might be. That’s all I’d say about it.



The podcast also speaks with former FBI Profiler Mary Ellen O’toole who spent 28 years at the FBI, and more than half that time was spent working in the BAU (Behavioral Analysis Unit).



DTH:
So, Mary Ellen, one of the things that we specifically wanted to talk to you about is signatures. Can you tell us what signatures are in a general sense?


Former FBI Profiler Mary Ellen O’toole:
Certainly. Signature behavior is behavior that the offender engages in at a crime scene that is over and beyond what is necessary to complete the crime. And, it generally is behavior that is, um, satisfying to the offender — whether it’s psychologically satisfying or sexually satisfying behavior.


The interesting thing about signature behavior, especially if you’re talking about a series of crimes, is that the offender will generally attempt to repeat the signature behavior. Not the MO — the modus operandi. That’s something different. But, the offender will tend to repeat the signature behaviors because that’s why he’s committing the crime in the first place.


DTH:
I’m curious from your research and your expertise, is it common to have multiple signatures? You know, is that, is that normal?


Former FBI Profiler Mary Ellen O’toole:
Well, it’s certainly possible to have multiple signatures at a crime scene. Again, if we go back to the definition, it is unnecessary behavior at a crime scene.

Generally, when you have multiple signatures it’s because you have a series of crimes. And so, at this point, what we have is a double homicide — whether or not there were other crimes out there is still unclear — but if there’s behavior at that scene that is not necessary to the crime itself, it could be sexual behavior. It could be post-mortem activity. But, if there are signature behaviors, yes. You can have more than one or two signature behaviors.



DTH:
Are signature behaviors typically things that happen after the murder or is there a, a typical time that the signature would happen?


Former FBI Profiler Mary Ellen O’toole:
In my experience, signatures can happen at any point — before, or during, or after the crime. So, for example, predatory behavior in some crimes can be a signature. Post-mortem mutilation after the murders can also be a signature. So, it could, it could occur anywhere within that temporal time frame of the crime.


DTH:
In our chat with the prosecutor, he described it as odd and he also said that there was a lot of physical evidence. And, I know that that’s kind of a broad term, but I’m curious from your standpoint — as somebody who’s been to hundreds of these kinds of scenes — what does a lot of physical evidence mean? What does odd mean?


Former FBI Profiler Mary Ellen O’toole:
So, I wouldn’t know what his definition of odd is. Odd to me, and odd to this prosecutor, can be, um, two different things. So, let me give you a few ideas of what may be, um, odd behaviors might be.

It could be, um, again post-mortem mutilation — what’s done to the victims after they’ve died, after they’ve been murdered. It could include redressing the victims. It could include dismemberment. It could include insertion of foreign objects. It could be the placement and the replacement of the victim’s bodies. It could be anything along that continuum. Basically, it could be almost anything. It could be the infliction of damage to the victims, both before death or after death. It could be, again, engaging with the victims in a certain way that is considered odd. So, it could be a wide variety of behaviors.


DTH Producer:
Can you talk to us about when, uh, a killer would stage a scene?
Would that be considered a signature?



Former FBI Profiler Mary Ellen O’toole:
Well, it depends on what you mean by staging a crime scene.

So, staging a crime scene in, in the world that I live in, means that the offender is making the crime look like something that it’s not. Because they want to point investigators into a totally different direction because they’re concerned they could be identified as the suspect.


So, some people may say, use that term, to mean that the offender manipulated the bodies — put them in a pose that may be sexually arousing for them, manipulated the body several times to sort of go along with whatever his sexual fantasies are. That’s a, that’s different than the traditional staging of a crime scene.

Staging trends to be done most often by someone who knows the victims. But if you’re talking about a scene where the offender spends time there, interacts with the victim post-mortem, and engages in behavior for his own sexual gratification or pleasure, I wouldn’t refer to that as staging. That’s post-mortem activity.


DTH continues their conversation with Robert Ives —


DTH:
Were you ever presented with possible suspects?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
No, in the sense of somebody said, “Rob, do you think there’s enough evidence to charge this person?” But in the sense of, “we have this and this and this, what do you think?” Yes, there was some of that.

And I would go so far as to say there’s at least one person, probably a couple out there, that I could believe could have committed the crime. But, of course, I would never discuss such a thing. Because, you, to accuse someone of something is to destroy their lives. As I told you before, I’m not even close to thinking that it’s more likely than not that any particular person that I’m aware of committed this crime. Not even close.


DTH:
You mentioned that especially in the early days you were involved in drafting up affidavits for search warrants. And can you put some sort of number on how many you were involved with?



Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
Dozens. I mean, A LOT.

There were a few search warrants. There weren’t so many search warrants but there were lots of subpoenas. In this case, we were trying to get cell phone locations, or numbers of cell phones, or identities of cell phone numbers. Things like that, and similar things during that period of time, and we cranked out a lot of that but it didn’t lead to anything significant.



Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
A frustrating thing -- and this is probably difficult to explain over the course of a podcast -- but the law, on searches with relation to cell phones and cell phone locations, was evolving right at the time this was going on. And I think some of the people discussing it didn’t always understand. Like they would say, “well, if you wanna know a cell phone location why don’t you get a search warrant?” And, the problem with that is -- let us take this case, as a perfect example.

There’s a tower near the crime scene and cell phones pinged off that tower around the time of the crime. We would like to know who they pinged off. Well, why don’t you get a search warrant? Because there is no probable cause to believe that any particular phone is going to tell us anything about the crime. There is no probable cause.

There is no, people act like a search warrant is easy to get. No, because we don’t think any particular phone is a criminal. But, if we want to get a pool of 25 people who were in the area, and therefore, could have possibly committed the crime, you have to find out. And, this is the difficulty of the modern electronic world.

Of course, to look in your phone I think, clearly that is a search warrant situation. That’s your private property. That’s like opening your house, or going in your car, you know, in your person. But the location of your phone -- I certainly understand people’s concern about their privacy. “Why can the government find out where I am?”

On the other hand, when there are two little girls that are dead and you want to find out who was nearby in the last two hours, it’s terrible to not be able to get that information. And the idea is that we’ll just get a search warrant. That’s not logically or legally practical.

And so, this is something society has to think about more because cell phone location data can, for a case like this — which is a lot of what I was doing at that time — could potentially be really valuable. ‘Cause, you know, Carroll County — 380 square miles, 20,000 people. Very few people were out near that crime scene at that time. It’s not like—



DTH:
It was a Monday afternoon.


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
You’re, you’re, you’re going to ping on like 500 phones that period of time.



Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
There were more FBI agents here than people can imagine. In my entire career, there was never in my entire career one-tenth as many FBI agents who were here simultaneously.


DTH:
A lot of people thought, in the beginning, that maybe they were lured there or had been communicating with somebody and had a, you know, meeting time or something. And, that there could be a link like that.


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
That seems unlikely to me.


DTH:
And you’re not the only one who has characterized that two to three day period like “we’re gonna find this guy” -- but I’m curious how long before everyone was kinda like, uh, this might take longer than we thought?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
I don’t think there was ever particularly that feeling. I mean, after a few weeks I’m sure people were feeling disheartened.

There were so many leads, uh, because of the phone-in system, and the tip system, and social media, and things like that. Police officers came from all over the state of Indiana and would come and spend a day or two, and they would just hand them assignments and guys would just go out.


So, I can tell you in the very early days, any time there would be a lead, the officers would get so excited. They gotta be there -- because they’d think surely we’re about to crack this — because there were potentially valuable leads. But, they just didn’t lead to anything.

I don’t know that there’s ever any point where they go, “it’s gonna go on for a long time”. I think it was more like well surely we’re gonna hit something soon, and that went on for a long time. I, I can’t speak for the thoughts of the people who are actually doing the investigating. I mean, people like Tony Leggett and Tony Hammond have spent endless hours on this case -- far more than I did.


DTH:
And so, you worked on this case for ten months, eleven months?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
Yes, but particularly, there was probably a stretch of a couple months where it was really intense because — it isn’t that there weren’t always things to do, but there was a period where we were really cranking out a lot of discovery material or investigative material, as they say. Subpoenas and search warrants.


DTH:
And, in that flurry of activity did you think we’re gonna get this wrapped up?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
Well, with a crime like this -- if you’d asked me at the time, I would’ve said within two or three days we would figure out who did it and have a charge filed. But the traditional crime — a murder in Carroll County, or I think in rural Indiana, or I think rural America — is generally a crime of passion and the suspect is obvious. And, it turned out there was no obvious suspect.

And even though, at the crime scene, there was a lot of physical evidence of one sort or another — which would lead, normally, to logical paths of investigation — it never led to a particular person. So, I was surprised. I am surprised. I thought surely we would figure out who did it, and we really couldn’t do so.

And we had some good leads there sometimes. There’s at least one person who was blowing off on the internet — who it was, it was total baloney — that if you’d taken seriously what they were saying, you might’ve thought that they’d committed the crime but they didn’t. In fact, it was a person underage.


DTH:
So, you didn’t have two or three people that you were looking at early on? Like it’s definitely one of them?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
No.

I can imagine there were people that came up over the course of the investigation that could’ve possibly committed the crime, but I certainly never had anybody I thought it was -- more likely than not -- to have committed the crime.



DTH:
You mentioned earlier on, a few minutes ago, about the, you know, hours after -- thinking this was kind of a two to three days that you would have somebody in custody. Are there any reasons you felt it was that timeframe?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
Well, only in the sense, this sense is that I’ve been involved in — a county this size probably has a murder every two to three years — and I’ve been involved in the prosecution of several murders. And there may have been, twenty years ago, an unsolved murder involving a couple that were found in a burned out car. I can’t think of another unsolved murder. When people died under violent circumstances, we knew who did it or we were pretty sure we knew who did it very quickly thereafter. It’s usually obvious. Either they’re right there or they’re the person with the most motive, ya know.

You, a fear in law enforcement is that the obvious person didn’t do it — which is what a lot of crime fiction is about. But generally, the person who obviously did it, did in fact do it, and we didn’t find that person. And that was surprising to me. But, in hindsight, knowing that this is not your ordinary case, right after this — or in the months after — we had a love triangle murder. It was just absolutely classic. And, you knew who probably did it and it was just a question of putting the pieces together. It was obvious. And that’s generally the way a murder goes.

The best to my knowledge, we never had a stranger murder while I was prosecuting attorney. I was prosecuting attorney in this county over the course of — several different times as prosecutor — 18 years. There was never a murder where the victim didn’t know the perpetrator prior to the crime.


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
One thing that people don’t understand is [that] the investigators make decisions about releasing evidence, and not releasing evidence, because they don’t want to give the game away. And, if a person does confess, they want to know the person is not giving a false confession. They’re not seeking publicity. They’re not mentally ill. And so, I don’t know what all the reasoning of the people in charge of the investigation is but I’m just a lawyer. I would leave it to them to determine what’s the best thing to release and not to release. I try to be really careful about it.


DTH:
Right.
And it also helps with the tips, and you know, to better identify what might be a really good tip.



Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
Of course. Somebody knows something that has not been released to the public. Right — yes, if somebody calls in a tip and knows something that the public doesn’t know, correct. That makes it a tremendously good tip.


DTH:
Was the physical evidence you’re talking about -- was that one of the reasons it seemed to be a feeling that this would be a few days before you had made, been able to make an arrest or have someone in custody?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
I think anytime [long pause] a teenage girl was found murdered — or a junior high girl and they were teenagers — I think we would expect to find who did it within two to three days. Anytime. So, that was the main reason I say that.

The fact there were two girls, and as I say the fact — there was plenty of physical evidence — it wasn’t very mysterious. How do I — if a person is simply killed like I was describing at first — you know, this person was killed and this person was killed with a gun. There’s more to it than that. That’s all I’m saying.


DTH:
One thing that Sgt. Riley told us is that the crime scene was complicated, in that, you know, there were people out there searching. Things that we didn’t even think of — like maybe someone spit, whatever. And, obviously, we know the crime scene is huge. It starts at the bridge, and it goes to where the bodies were found. Just generally, have you ever dealt with a crime scene that large with that many complicating factors before?


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
As I told you, I’ve only dealt with a few murder cases. But, generally, a crime scene -- a murder crime scene -- has been in a room, it's been in a place. So, I can’t recall one that had a big outdoor circumstance away from a house. Yeah, there’s a lot of, you’re right — those are some factors. And whatever Sgt. Riley says is, is so. Kim Riley is an excellent police officer. And that’s also true — the crime scene is unquestionably contaminated. Most crime scenes are contaminated to a certain extent.


DTH:
Ya know, on the subject of DNA.
I’m not—the police haven’t said nothing to us about DNA in this particular case. We won’t ask about that. Just, in your experience, the role of DNA in a case — like when people think about DNA, they think about CSI. They think that something happened and there’s just like DNA all over the place. It’s not that simple, is it?



Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
No.

You know, we have incredible technology. There’s contact DNA — so people who have even touched your clothing -- but of course, lots of people touch your clothing — and so there’s lots of DNA and it may not be there at all.


And, when in sexual assault cases — semen and the DNA from semen is tremendous evidence. But you have to have that, and then you have to have somebody you can identify it with. Blood DNA is tremendous evidence because the perpetrator of crimes, often their blood is at crime scenes for a variety of reasons. But when you’re just thinking, "oh there’s contact DNA" — somebody brushed somebody, somebody touched somebody. Well, that’s really, there’s really a lot of stuff to sort it out to find out. Particularly, if it’s unknown, to match the unknown. Even if it's an unknown person, that doesn’t mean it’s the person who committed the crime. And, and you -- look at these two. I mean, these are two girls who are at school all day. I mean, there’s no telling how many people’s DNA might be on their clothing.


DTH:
We’ve talked a lot about this crime and it being, the possibility of it being, one of those crimes where the person who committed it just managed to step into all the right places to avoid being arrested -- not necessarily a mastermind that had some sort of grand scheme that has allowed him to get away with this.

Would you characterize this crime as something where the guys just stepped in all the right places?



Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
If you look at the overhead photos of this area, there was maybe one house that could look down and see the crime scene, and it’s unlikely anyone would be there. But yeah, this was a daylight crime it appears. Almost certainly, a crime during the daylight, in an area where people could’ve come along, and I just can’t see it as a big master plan. It’d be a crazy master plan.

I think it’s more [sigh] a person committed a horrible crime and then they took off, and nobody — or if anybody saw them — we haven’t been able to pinpoint it. People were seen coming and going, and there are some witnesses. And we well may have seen — and I say we — someone may have seen this person leaving the crime scene or going to the crime scene. But we’ve never been able to put that information together with enough evidence to show who that person was and that they committed this crime.

I do not believe it was a planned crime. That personally — it doesn’t make any sense for me. That to have been a planned crime because you couldn’t know. Unless there’s something else out there, you know, this luring thing that I told you, and I hope the state police said this. I don’t believe there’s any evidence they were lured out there.

I think they just decided to go for a walk. They were great friends. They just thought it was a nice day, let’s go walk the trail. I think that somebody being there right then -- to know they’d be there — I don’t believe that. I, I wouldn’t be shocked if it turned out I was wrong, but I don’t believe that someone knew that they were going to be there to walk by.


DTH:
You, looking at it. Especially at, when you get past the creek and you’re in the trees. It’s almost like the perfect trap in a way. Someone walks out there, you’re already out there. No one’s gonna see you.


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
If you’re on the far side of the bridge, there’s not a logical place to go. When you think about this in hindsight, you think "well, the girls should’ve run in two different directions". Well, of course, they should’ve but that’s easy for us to say.


DTH:
I’m not even sure I would think about that at my age, and certainly not at their age, and to be up so high —


Former Chief Prosecutor Robert Ives:
For her to pull out her phone and film this, or to video it, was an amazing thing. What’s really heartbreaking about this is that she did this thing. We have this unbelievable evidence -- a video and sound of this person. And to not be able to catch the person? And I, we, uh, didn’t talk about that previously, but of course for the police, that’s what stumps — how can we not figure out who this is? How are you going to have video and audio of a person about to commit a crime and not be able to figure out who it is? It’s something out of a TV show.
 
Down the Hill: The Delphi Murders
Episode 6 -- A Walk in The Woods



Individuals interviewed for this episode:
Kelsie German (KG) - Libby's older sister
Doug Carter (DC) - Indiana State Police Superintendent
Julia Leahy (JL) - Executive Director of the Carroll County Chamber of Commerce
DTH - DTH Podcast Host

We know "the hill" is at the south end of the bridge, and the girls crossed the bridge from the north. We don’t know how -- but we know the killer and the girls crossed back to the other side of the creek not far from where they were dropped off. That’s where their bodies were found almost a day after they went missing, about a quarter mile from the bridge.

DTH:
We don’t know how or when they were killed, and we don’t know why.
All we really know is that whatever investigators saw out there it shook them badly.



The place where a murder happens matters here a lot.

Delphi, Indiana is about 1.5 hours northwest of Indianapolis, and it’s the Carroll County seat. It's only about a 2-hour drive to Chicago and a small northeastern neighbor of Lafayette -- home of Purdue University.

DTH spoke with Julia Leahy, the Executive Director of the Carroll County Chamber of Commerce in Delphi, to get a feel for the small town.


JL:
Delphi is a quaint, small community that has a lot of interesting things to do. Um, you’re so close to the bigger cities. I think people like to live here [and] visit here because it’s that small town slower pace, you know. And you can escape the hustle and bustle of the bigger cities, but you’re so close if you need those big city amenities.

DTH:
What are some of the big landmarks for places?

JL:
Some of the landmarks here, uh -- we’re home of the Wabash and Erie Canal, so there’s a one-mile section where you can actually take a canal boat ride. Um, and kind of live like you did in the 1800s. And that was entirely built by volunteers.

The center, the park, the trail system, umm. Another thing that was more recent, uh, about six years ago, was the Delphi Opera House.


DTH:
What are the people of Delphi like?

JL:
People in Delphi are friendly, you know. It’s not unusual to walk down the street and say hi to — people greet you that way. And, I’m sure you have found that too. It’s — people wave, they say hello. If you look lost, they are gonna stop and say, “what can we help you with?” Um, we’re very -- we’re a close community is how I would describe us.

DTH:
Do you think that people outside of this area connect too Delphi with this crime?

JL:
How do you mean?

DTH:
Well, I mean, is that something you come up against as you are promoting this area? When you say "I’m from Delphi"?

JL:
Yes.

DTH:
What do people say?

JL:
Exactly. So, for months on end, when I would travel and go to conferences and things like that -- and they wanna know where you came from -- I would say well, my -- "I live and work in Delphi". And, it was an immediate reaction. And even to this day -- it doesn’t happen as often but — people are like "oh, yeah I remember what happened there in Delphi".

And even from a tourism point of view, and when you Google Delphi or you Google things to do, I mean that’s what’s coming up. You know, it’s sad that we’re known for that now. Umm, and I hope that people realize that there’s so much more here. And, you can come here and enjoy a lot of things but also still know that you’re in a place where people still remember, fondly, you know, about these girls.


DTH:
It, uh, it sounds like there’s a resiliency to the town.

JL:
Umm, yeah that’s a good point. I think that people here are strong. The kids were strong, you know. My niece was the same age and it just — they have come through this, you know. It’s sad that they all had to grow up so quickly that day, and um, but you see them — people are close. You know, people are closer together.

Um, I think you’re willing to help your neighbors out even more than you ever were before, but there’s still this, this — people are still more cautious. More suspicious, they look over their shoulders, which people probably already do that in bigger cities but here we didn’t. We didn’t have to -- you didn’t to lock your door. You didn’t have to worry about that and now -- stuff like this didn’t happen here. It doesn’t happen here. It’s like we caught up to the rest of the world in the most horrific way possible.



The road 300 North is a narrow country road, and as far as the story of the Delphi murders is concerned, it’s the main backdrop and where that day in February 2017 began. There’s not much of a parking lot where the girls had entered the trail, which is why it was a drop off spot and not really a place where people parked.

The cemetery is one of the landmarks in this case because it indicates the crime scene -- it was just down from the cemetery closer to the creek. On the other side of that cemetery, RL's property begins. He owns quite a bit of land down by the creek, as well. The killer left the bodies of Abby and Libby on RL's land, which attracted a lot of attention to him.

DTH reached out to RL several times and invited him to speak on the show. He wasn’t interested in talking about the case now, but he gave several interviews to different news outlets back in 2017. He even showed a few of them around his property and the freshly cleared crime scene.


Here's a snippet from an interview with HLN —

HLN:
So where’s the high bridge?

RL:
Um, it’s — you can actually see it from my property.
Ok, there’s the taped off area where the girls were found.


HLN:
I can get down here but this is steep.

RL:
I know.

HLN:
So, how — because of that — how, what are the entry points?
Like how would somebody actually—


RL:
You’re, you’re seeing it.

HLN:
So, someone would’ve — this is the only way?

RL:
Pretty much.
Well, you could walk — this ground is so [unintelligible] my feet here.
You okay?


HLN:
Yep.

RL:
You all right?
Oh, okay all right.


HLN:
Got it.

RL:
You’re good to go.
You’re a country girl.


RL:
Now somewhere in this roped off area, the girls were found. I’m not sure what location they were actually laying in or anything.

The family of the German girl came here the other day and put some flowers down there in a particular spot, so maybe they know more about it than I do.


HLN:
Probably.
So, other than coming through your property though -- how else can somebody...


RL:
Well, my property ends over here and the other guy begins in the ravine there.


DTH spoke with Doug Carter and Kelsi German on the trails separately, but their questions and answers were all mixed up together.


KG:
The red gate wasn’t there at the time. There was just a sign there that said Monon High Bridge, and you could just park there and enter the trails from there.

In the winter there’s no leaves, so it’s very dark but you can see so much more into the trees. It’s just as pretty as it was—now, then.


DTH:
Talk a little bit about the logistics of coming out here and searching for two girls when you don’t know where they are.

DC:
Right. It’s almost impossible, really, to get your arms around that.
This is as rural as it gets anywhere in the country, really. And, it’s, it’s rolling. It’s up and down and there’s not much [unintelligible] straight into the trail. It was quite a task. It was quite a task, and--


DTH:
And, the search began just as it’s starting to get dark.

DC:
It did. Right around 4 o’clock in the afternoon or so, yeah.

DTH:
Did it complicate things for you guys that -- this is such a volunteer community and when people heard they just came out and started searching on their own?

DC:
No. No, it was awesome. It was awesome.
Now that -- obviously the end result wasn’t good, but there was nothing compromised by doing what they did.


DTH:
So, some people have speculated that — we’ve heard an estimate that maybe there were a thousand people out here searching that first night, and that that did, in fact, contaminate your crime scene.

DC:
I don’t know, you know. There’s all kinds of speculation. It’s easy to have an opinion when you don’t know what you’re talking about.

You know, it’d be different if once the girls were found, they would have been completely moved. That’s not the case. I don’t agree with that statement.


DTH:
With so many people looking for them that first night, why weren’t they found?

DC:
[Long pause]
Umm, I, I think I’ll leave that question unanswered.


DTH:
We are approaching the area where the girls entered the trail, and there’s a, a trail marker there that’s become a bit of a memorial. What does it mean to you?

DC:
Ahh, this intersection’s tough for me. It will always be tough for me.

Umm, [long pause] I can close my eyes and I can see ‘em -- the innocence here. You know, I can see — they came from the left side over here. Laughing and joking, and cutting up like two young girls do, probably. Or walking quietly or having a conversation about whatever, and then they turn left and the world’s about to change.

So many people are not afraid of where they are, but for those that remain -- and thinking man, man, if they’d have just turned right. You know, not left.

So, yeah this is a pretty special place. You know, and on that bench, and like you said, the beauty up there. Uh, [long pause] it’s something. And there’s a reason this all happened, I just don’t know what it is yet. I just don’t know what it is. I just don’t know what it is. [Pause] I don’t know.




DTH:
Is that to the girls?

KG:
Umm hmm.
Sometimes I always check to see if there’s something he could’ve left here. Like maybe he left a note for them or maybe he left a rock that he painted or something because he could have. So, I just always check the notes when I come here and the notes on her grave and things like that.


DTH:
What do you think he would say in a note?
How would you recognize that it was an item left by him?


KG:
I don’t know.
I just feel like if it was from him I would know just by looking at it. I feel like he’d be really sneaky and try to do something like that.


DTH:
What did that note say?

KG:
Uh, it was like a poem.
It says --
"Love is so strong that it will guide your way,
and everyone is still looking for the coward that stole you away.
So, keep smiling and guiding us down below,
for we love you so much that your soul's beauty and love will never grow old."





DTH:
Do you think there could be that element?
That he’s watching? He’s that close now?


DC:
Probably, yeah.
Yeah, whoever it is, and whoever it was, has stared at this nature reserve like we are right now. I know that. Even if it was his first day, he stood right here. Stood right here, yeah.




DTH:
When you would go out to the crime scene, what is that like?

KG:
It’s very peaceful.
You guys probably haven’t been out there yet, but it’s just out there in the middle of the woods. And, it’s just the most peaceful place because you can watch the creek and just sit there and think about the nature that’s around you instead of what happened.


DTH:
Do you feel like that area is secluded?
Is it an area that he would’ve known I have privacy here?


KG:
Probably, yes.

You can’t really see anything. You can just barely see the bridge, and you can see all of the water and just nothing but trees.

So, I don’t think anybody would’ve heard them or him or anyone else.





DTH:
We’re approaching the bridge now.

DC:
Damn.

DTH:
What do you see as you look at it?

DC:
Him. I can see him standing right out there. I can see him standing right out there.

I feel the same way I feel every stinking time I could out here, gosh dang it. You know, and then you look back this way and you see them walking here. You can see, you can see Abby and Libby just, just doing what girls do. Yeah, [unintelligible] where this bridge is going.


DTH:
Do you think him approaching them on the bridge was intentional or is that just where he caught up with them?

DC:
Ya know, that’s a good question. I don’t know.
It would be speculative; nobody knows right now. I don’t know.

Gosh, I hope we can ask him one day, and I hope he’ll tell us and then be free.

Lets walk up here closer.


DTH:
All right, that goes right down.

DC:
Oh, yep. It goes right down.
Nothing good is going to happen.


DTH:
And that’s what?
Like 73 feet?


DC:
This was gone — this was gone then, too. That was gone then, too.

So, you know for the — if those would’ve been my girls and I found out that they would have crossed it, I’d just -- "HEY! WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?"
What are you thinking?


DTH:
We talk to a lot of people who have crossed the bridge who say the first time they crawled.

DC:
Yeah, I’ve heard that too. I’ve heard that too.

DTH:
But, I’ve also talked to people who have ridden ATVs across this.

DC:
Oh my gosh.

DTH:
Do you think that Libby took that video intentionally because she was concerned or was she already recording video when he approached?

DC:
I think she did what she thought she could do to identify who this person is.

I’m gonna thank her for that one day, yeah. Yeah, I think she realized that something was really badly wrong. And for whatever—we don’t know, we don’t know why.

We don’t know what led up to that. We don’t know what interaction there was. We know a little bit more than we have talked about, but there’s a lot of detail in that engagement that we don’t know.


DTH:
Can you put like a percentage on how much of the story you feel you understand now:

DC:
Umm, I hadn’t thought about that before.

[Pause]

You know, that’s a tough question. That’s a tough question.

We know a lot about before and after, but there’s a lot about the middle we don’t know. So, I would say two-thirds, and you put a third in the middle. It makes the beginning and the end. It makes sense.




DTH:
The day that you dropped off Libby and Abby, you did see other kids out here, right?

KG:
Yeah, other kids that were like Libby’s age were here. Um, and I knew that a lot of my friends were out here that day, so I knew it would be okay. Or thought it would be okay.

DTH:
So, do you think this was the kind of place on a day off from school that a lot of people might think, “Hmm… there might be some kids or people out at the High Bridge.”

KG:
Oh yeah, I’m sure that people knew that there would be kids out here. Especially if you lived here, you knew that people would go out on the trails when they had a day off.

Most of the time we would go during the summer, and I would absolutely not want to cross it but I wouldn’t let her go by herself. So, I would cross it because she wanted to.


DTH:
She wasn’t afraid of crossing this bridge?

KG:
Libby wasn’t scared of anything except needles and anything that caused pain.



DC:
From the time their little fit hit that very railroad tie, and we know they did, what happened between here and there and then that initial engagement with the murderer. What happened?

DTH:
So, they were on the far end of this bridge when Libby took that video and Abby was still on the bridge. You said before -- you think that maybe he knew this area well enough to know that’s a very vulnerable place over there.

KG:
Umm hmm.

DTH:
Why?

KG:
Well, the bridge is really scary, and uh I wouldn’t cross it had I not known what it looked like. And so, if you don’t know what it looks like, then you wouldn’t know how vulnerable you are when you’re on it.

So, umm, I definitely think he took advantage of how vulnerable they were there at that moment.




DTH:
What do you say to the people who are frustrated it hasn’t happened yet.

DC:
I understand. I don't always say I understand to people, but I, I understand. Yeah, I understand. I’d do anything, you’d do anything to help people close this chapter.

DTH:
You know, one of the things that we kinda talk about within a story is when you don’t know what happened, usually the simplest explanation is what happened.

When we find out what happened here, do you think it’s going to be simple?
Is it going to be the simplest explanation?


DC:
No, I don’t think so, and that’s just my own personal opinion. Because, it’s uh, it’s complex.

It’s—from what happened down there to what happened over there is complex. And, there’s not a simple explanation.

Ya know, if—I mean, if you and I were standing on this bridge, and you pushed me off and I died. Simple explanation, right? Or I jumped, simple explanation. Tragic — but simple explanation. It’s something that’s not, that’s not like this.
 
Down the Hill: The Delphi Murders
Episode 7 -- Madness


Individuals Interviewed for this Episode:
Doug Carter - ISP Superintendent
Kim Riley - ISP Police Sgt. & Communications Officer
Kelsi German - Libby's Sister
Todd Ladd - Pastor of United Methodist Church in Delphi
Diane Erskine - Abby's Grandmother
Sadie Maude - Libby's Cousin
Becky Patty - Libby's Grandmother & Legal Guardian
Mike Patty - Libby's Grandfather & Legal Guardian
Tobe Leazenby - Carroll County Sheriff
Erica Gibson - Friend of Abby and Libby
Amy Gibson - Mother of Friend of Abby and Libby


ISP Superintendent Doug Carter:
A sketch is not a photograph. A sketch is what we think is likely a rendition of a composite of a human being. It is not a photograph.

I can look at both of ‘em and put 'em both together. I can see them—I can see them together and that’s what I think this person probably looks like. It’s not a photograph.

Now, remember we have a photograph from the neck down. That’s where somebody who knows who this is. I always think about that now with my own family or with, with other people. You think gosh dang it — somebody, if you, if we put a bag on your head, somebody knows who’s body that is. And we have his voice, and we have his stride. Never in my lifetime did you have all three. And, we still just — this is, this is this monster mystery.



Mid-July 2017 - the first sketch is released five months after the murders


ISP Sgt. Kim Riley:
We feel this is very important because it actually gives a better view of the, uh, the person in the picture that you see down below [the still image taken from the video on Libby’s phone]. Uh, it shows a little more facial features. It gives you a little more information on what we’re looking at -- who the suspect might be. And that’s why we feel it is very important to get this picture out there at this time.


Kelsi German:
It was really interesting to see a face with the body that we had. We knew what his walk kind of looked like, and what he looked like physically, but we didn’t know what his face looked like. And so, putting a face with it was very eye-opening. It made it really real. And it made it so that there was a person we had to look for rather than a voice we had to look for.

DTH:
Did you recognize the face?

Kelsi German:
I didn’t recognize it. Although, I do think there are a lot of similarities in them. In the face, it did look a lot familiar. A lot of the characteristics in it, you can see them in half the people you walk by down the street.

So, when I look at it -- and I'm like, "oh it could be this person or it could be that person," but really it could be anybody. So, that was kinda something that I was kinda struggling with — trying to figure out who this person could be and why it looked familiar to me.




Pastor Todd Ladd:
I’ve not looked at the sketch and thought, "oh that could be..." One other thing is, the reality is, it could be half the white males in Carroll County. And so, I don’t look at it and have this sense of dread. Or say, “oh here’s who it is”. But, there’s also the acknowledgement that you look around and that’s, that’s half the white males in Carroll County — of a certain age that could look that way.



Diane Erskine:
When you study that face, and you look at the sketch and you look, you try to think about how old they are. And, and you know, try to make, try to make some connection.

I, uh, you know, what’s the first lesson you learn in science -- for every action there’s an equal opposite reaction. So, that’s our, I think in our makeup as human beings. We’re trying to justify, too rationalize. Well, this happened so this -- what is the cause? What’s over here? What’s the action that caused? Well, you — that doesn’t work with evil. It just doesn’t.

Um, there is no justification. There is no rationalization for this act. You know, it — I don’t know what the motivation is -- if there even was a motivation. I, I don’t know because it’s evil. It’s -- and it’s deceiving, and it’s come to kill, and steal, and destroy. And so, there’s just — it’s not, uh, it’s not, uh, a mindset that we have. But as humans, we want to know what caused it.


DTH:
Do you think he’s local?

Diane Erskine:
I, I don’t — I honestly do not have an opinion about that. Um, [scoffs] it’s hard enough to go to the gas station and the grocery store, and, and, and drive down the road and you see someone walking by the road, and uh, look at them and, and wonder. But, anywhere — and wonder. I, I honestly don’t have a thought that they are or they are not. Honestly, I really don’t.



DTH:
So when the sketches -- the first sketch came out, did you recognize that face?


Sadie M:
No. Um, still to this day it makes me sick to my stomach. I get a knot in my throat when I hear the voice, um, or see the picture. Or I just -- I don’t know why. It just — that’s what happens.

DTH:
It’s the face of evil.

Sadie Maude:
Yeah. The first four or five months, I had to have my husband walk me to the car every morning. I wouldn’t go outside when it was dark outside. Just in fear — but in the back of my mind, I don’t think it would happen at night. This was something that happened during the day, but I was just still scared.

Um, it’s changed a lot of people here. Um, not only in our family circle but the whole town. They were in fear. This would never happen here. I mean, there’s three stop lights in town. But it did -- so now we all have changed. Not just one person, we have all changed.




Becky Patty:
There’s been times that you see somebody that just looks a lot like the sketch, and I can’t stop myself. Tara and I were at a stoplight one time, and both of us — and the person felt uncomfortable. I mean, he knew. He felt us staring so hard that he turned and looked at us, but we couldn’t — you can’t help yourself.

You stare. You look. You scan a room. You scan anywhere you are. You go to a restaurant, you’re sitting there and you’re looking. While you’re carrying on your conversation, you’re looking. At work, when we’re on the road, you look.

I keep thinking, “I, you know what — I had a job that I’m out and about a lot, and you think “oh, if only, if only I could see him.”


DTH:
What would you do?

Becky Patty:
That’d be a tough one.

Well, I want to make sure we get the right person, so I wouldn’t — I definitely would be calling 9-1-1. I would not be — I , if I really thought it was the person, I’d be calling 9-1-1.



DTH:
Has anybody walked into your office to say, “I look like the sketch. I wanna clear my name. Here’s my DNA?”


Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
Yes. [Laugh] That has occurred.

DTH:
A lot?

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
I’d say less than 5 times that I remember, yeah. Not a lot — but yeah, it has happened.

DTH:
And by the same token, have there been people that you’ve gone to check out and said “give us some DNA” and they’re like “I’ll pass”.

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
Right, yes. We’ve had that -- and then that’s, you know, where our, our investigators pursue a search warrant thru our prosecutor and pursue it that way, legally.

DTH:
So, is there anybody that you’ve wanted DNA from that you haven’t gotten it?

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
No one comes to mind. Eventually, we do.



Sgt. Kim Riley:
Tying us up on false leads and innuendos is not something we want. We want actual facts. We want information that’s gonna help us, not hurt somebody else’s pride. Or their dignity, or uh, embarrass a family because you think he’s the killer. Let us make that decision. That’s what we’re here for.



Superintendent Doug Carter:
I got several this morning. And when, you know — we encourage people not to do side by sides because when you talk about somebody you know here -- we’ve had a lot of people that have been targeted in this and, really, it’s complicated their lives.

So, then we encourage people to be really, really careful doing side by sides. Give us the name. Give us the address. Give us your thoughts. But, don’t do a side by side with a living human being. It makes sense. And, keep in mind that a sketch is not a photograph. It is a rendition of an approximate view. Um, it is not a digital photograph.


DTH:
We also talked to a sketch artist -- not one, uh, here in your state -- who said sketches really aren’t for people who don’t know the person.

Superintendent Doug Carter:
Right.

DTH:
They’re for people who do.

Superintendent Doug Carter:
Oh, I love that. It’s so true. It is so true, Barbara. That’s so true.



Sgt. Kim Riley:
My problem is when you take somebody’s picture, and put it next to the drawing we had, and say "this is the guy" -- and you have no idea who this person is -- or even if you do -- can you tie that person to Delphi? If you can’t, why are you even trying to make something out of nothing?

You wanna be the big star of the show, so to speak. That’s not what police work is all about. It embarrasses that person, for one. Especially if you put a name with it. The next morning, how would you like to have about six phone calls saying -- "Hey Kim Riley, I understand that you’re the murderer of the two girls"? If you look at the Facebook, ya know, I don’t want to be getting those, you know, those phone calls.


DTH:
Well, you know... if it really is the killer, wouldn’t that perhaps tip him off that now people are on to him? He might change his behavior.

Sgt. Kim Riley:
Yes. He’s gonna change his behavior. He’s gonna change his look. He’s gonna — excuse the expression — get outta dodge. Uh, you know, he’s not gonna hang around.

Tell us. Send that information to us. Don’t send it and then put it on facebook. Or put it on Facebook and then decide to send to us. Cause we’re not -- we look at Facebook but we don’t — that’s not where we get our information. We get our information from the tipline and from the emails.

And, preferably, we prefer the emails. It’s the easiest way to do it. And, that’s the way we want it 'cause we don’t have time to go on and look at every Facebook page. And we, and most people don’t have that much time and, you know. When you’re, just because we’re dealing with this case doesn’t mean there’s not five, or ten, or fifteen other different cases we’re dealing with also.




DTH:
Some of them think they could actually solve this.

Sadie Maude:
[Laughs] Can you insert an eyeball there?

Yeah, dumb people and their Facebook investigating -- that's what we like to call it. But they don’t have legal authority to do anything, so I don’t understand why they think they can solve it.

Somebody called a tip in on my husband, and my husband is like under 135 pounds, like no. And, we had a police officer sit down at my kitchen table and ask my husband many, and many, and many questions. And, it was hurtful but we were open to tell him. "No, this is where we were. This is what we were doing." Because we had no shame to hide because we knew what we were doing, and we would never want to do anything like that to someone. Especially to someone in my family of all things.

The cop was like "I don’t know why this tip was called in, but we have to follow up thru this so we’re just gonna ask you these questions. And, if you’re — I might be back if something doesn’t check out." And, everything checked out fine. My husband was at work that day, so —




Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
My name’s been brought up three times in the whole process. You know, what was the sheriff doing that day?

You know, uh, were there, uh, a personal issue that someone has against me? Or I — I don’t know. Were that, were those three separate times where they came from — but um, as with everyone else, the -- and I, you know, again kudos to our investigators because they came to me and said "hey sheriff, I hate to tell you this but..."


DTH:
We gotta check you out.

Sheriff Tobe Leazenby:
[Laughs] Yeah, yeah. And so, like everyone else, uh, you know, that’s exactly what they did. I mean, they checked into the various individuals in our community and said okay you know what — where were you basically during this time period on February 13, 2017?



Erika Gibson:
People talk without knowing anything.

Amy Gibson:
Um, people just want their five seconds of fame, and that’s all it comes down to. You know, they want to throw out whatever they can to get their name out there. Regardless if it’s true, regardless of who it hurts. They just — they’re selfish. They don’t care about Abby and Libby. Their interest is just to be the one who caught the killer and to get that money. I mean, that’s all it comes down to. They don’t have — they don’t care all about Delphi. They don’t care about the families, you know.

Erika Gibson:
They all bash everybody in Delphi. Like every person in Delphi is this or Delphi people are this. And so, we know we’re not that.

Amy Gibson:
Ya know, we come from a good town. Delphi is not bad, you know. We’ve never had violence here like this. I’ve grown up here my whole life. We’ve never had anything like this happen before, you know. And, everybody you know -- getting on LE saying that they, that they’re corrupt, and they know what happened, and all that stuff.

We don’t believe that. The people that live here, we trust in our law enforcement. You know, we trust that they’re doing everything they can. This doesn’t happen here. They didn’t know what was happening. You know, like, I would never blame them for anything.





Mike Patty:
It doesn’t bother me, it really doesn’t because I know the truth is on my side. People can speculate, and throw out all kinds of stuff, and innuendos, and rumors. It’s not going to change the facts. And remember, right — I live in a world of facts and data.

Um, while I would like for my family and everybody else to be able to see the, you know, the speculations that people put out there. It really doesn’t. And, even between the wife and I — she’ll, I know at times she says I don’t know how it doesn’t bother you. And, I say because it doesn’t — it’s not the truth.

You know, people out there that look at this as, as uh, I don’t know if they look at this as a case. I don’t, I don’t know how to say it for sure, but if they would take all that energy that they spend and put it in a positive light, they could truly possibly help the situation.

But, you know — and, and that’s what I would ask people. To stop and think before you post. Before you do things — is this really gonna help? How can I help the situation? Make it better, not worse. Um, because all the, you know, the vile stuff that’s been said about, you know, myself and the family -- that doesn’t, that doesn’t provide any positivity towards to getting to a resolution here.



Becky Patty:
And, as for some of the other things -- I just think there’s malicious people out there. Too much time on their hands. Um, the only thing that worries me is that it’s not just us but there’s other people that they could potentially ruin their lives. You know, these people have done nothing. These are innocent people out there. There’s only one guilty person, so all of these pictures and all of these people that they’re sharing -- you know, they’re all innocent. Maybe, maybe one.

DTH:
Becky, I can’t help but notice — you’ve obviously suffered unspeakable loss but its this, or this part of the story, about this kind of effect of social media -- it's the first time I’ve seen you visibly angry.

Becky Patty:
I get very angry. There’s been so many lies -- not rumors, lies -- brought out. There’s been things, private things, that’ve been put out there that should’ve never been put out there. They have invaded things that they should’ve never invaded. This isn’t entertainment, this is our lives. So yeah, I get very angry because they, I think, dirty Libby’s memory.



Sgt. Kim Riley
That’s the information we were getting. People were ex-wives, ex-husbands, um, ex-lovers. We were getting information on them. Just because you don’t like ‘em doesn’t mean that they killed those two little girls.

DTH:
Why do you think that people do that?

Sgt. Kim Riley:
Just to cause a hassle for them. Uh, I mean, because if we get a tip on you, we’re gonna have to check into it. I mean -- we don’t, we don’t know where you were at that day. We don’t know what you were doing. So, we gotta send somebody out or call a department in the area — because some of these tips were coming from all over the country, all over the world. We have had people -- we weren’t gonna transport guys all over the country to do it. We would have to call the area’s local departments in the area -- sheriff’s department or maybe the FBI had to send out somebody. So, it was, it was tying up time and a lot of precious time that we really didn’t have.

DTH:
So, if somebody sent in a tip and said that I was the person, then you would have to call the Atlanta police department, who would have to then track down my employer, who would then, basically, have to vouch for if I was actually working that day or not. That’s the, that’s the extent —

Sgt. Kim Riley
Exactly.

DTH:
And, if you weren’t, if you were out running errands, then you gotta go track down —

Sgt. Kim Riley
People that you talked to.

If we have you in Atlanta on that day, you’re not going to be in Delphi at the — if we have you in Atlanta, at the station or on an errand to go get something, and you were back in an hour, we — that’s gonna cover you pretty good.

But let's say you called in sick that day. Now, we gotta go send somebody. First of all, we send them to your work to find out if you worked that day, and they tell us no he was not there. Now, we gotta send somebody to your house to talk to you. And, you’re going, "Delphi, Indiana? Where in the world is that at?" And, now we’ve wasted your time. We’ve wasted the investigators time here to send the information to Atlanta, to have Atlanta or the FBI -- whoever wants to do it -- find himself an investigator to check on you.
 
DOWN THE HILL: THE DELPHI MURDERS
Episode 8 - A New Direction



INDIVIDUALS INTERVIEWED FOR THIS EPISODE
KIM RILEY - Indiana State Police SGT & Information Officer
DOUG CARTER - Indiana State Police Superintendent
DAVE BURSTON - (former) Indiana State Police Captain
SUSAN HENDRICKS - HLN Reporter
CARRIE TIMMONS - Libby’s Mother
MIKE PATTY - Libby’s Grandfather & Legal Guardian
DIANE ERSKINE - Abby’s Grandmother
ERICA GIBSON - friend of Abby and Libby
AMY BROWN - mother of Erica Gibson
LISA DELANEY - owner of Stone House Restaurant in Delphi, IN
CYNTHIA ROSSI - one of Abby’s best friends
KELSI GERMAN - Libby’s Sister
TOBE LEAZENBY - Sheriff of Carroll County


SGT. KIM RILEY
I, I knew that things would be tough. Uh, I knew I was going to get drilled. I knew the superintendent was gonna get drilled. And, we were the two main people that people were going to look at, especially being that the superintendent is the one who, excuse that expression, threw it out there. I mean, I could’ve done it — he did it. We all felt it was better than he did it. Just because of his ability to speak and talk.



FROM PRESS CONFERENCE ON APRIL 22, 2019


ISP SUPERINTENDENT DOUG CARTER
Information that is being released today is the result of literally thousands and thousands of hours of extraordinary investigative efforts by Delphi, Carroll County, the FBI, the Indiana State Police, and countless other agencies.

This community surrounded us some twenty-six months ago, and you did everything you could to support us. But most importantly, you surrounded the family of these two little girls. Gosh, I’ll never forget it.

After you hear what we’re going to release today, I’m going to ask for your continued support, your continued understanding, your empathy and compassion, um, as we, we move forward, uh, to find out who did this. And, we will.


We’re seeking the public’s help to identify the driver of a vehicle that was parked at the old CPS/DCS welfare building in the city of Delphi, that was abandoned on the east side of County Road 300 North, next to the Hoosier Heartland Highway, between the hours of noon to five on February 14th, 2017. If you were parked there or know who was parked there, please contact the officers at the command post at the Delphi City Building.

We’re releasing additional portions of the audio recording from that day. Please keep in mind the person talking is one person and is the person on the bridge with the girls. This is not two different people speaking. Please listen to it very, very carefully.

We’re also releasing video recovered from Libby’s phone. This video has never before been previously released. The video shows the suspect walking on the bridge. When you see the video, watch the, watch the person’s mannerisms as they walk. Watch the mannerisms as he walks. Do you recognize the mannerisms as being someone that you might know?

Remember he is walking on the former railroad bridge. Because of the deteriorated condition of the bridge, the suspect is not walking naturally due to the spacing between the ties.


During the course of this investigation, we have concluded the first sketch released will become secondary, as of today. The result of the new information and intelligence over time leads us to believe the sketch, which you will see shortly, is the person responsible for the murders of these two little girls. We also believe this person is from Delphi, currently or has previously lived here, visits on a regular basis, or works here. We believe this person is currently between the age range of 18 and 40 but might appear younger than his true age.

Directly to the killer who may be in this room — we believe you are hiding in plain sight. For more than two years, you never thought we would shift gears to a different investigative strategy, but… WE HAVE. We likely have interviewed you or someone close to you. We know that this about power to you. And, you want to know what we know. And, one day, YOU WILL.

A question to you — what will those closest to you think of when they find out that you brutally murdered two little girls? Two children — only a coward would do such a thing. We are confident that you have told someone what you have done, or at the very least, they know because of how different you are since the murders.

[Sigh]
[Pause]


We try so hard to understand how a person could do something like this to two children, to two children. And I recently watched a movie called The Shack, [pause] and there’s also a book that talks so well about evil, about death, and about eternity.

To the murderer — I believe you have just a little bit of a conscience left, [sigh] and I can assure you that how you left them in that woods is NOT [pause], is NOT what they’re experiencing today.

To the family — [sigh] I hope that you all will give them some time because we’re going to be asking that there’s no media inquiry or no media response for at least the next two weeks. And, I hope you understand why. The family found out about this, about this information, this morning. [Sigh] I just want the family to know that when I take my last breath on this earth, I’ll be thinking of them.

There’s going to be a tremendous amount of questions I know that, I know that. Uh, never in my career have I stood in front of something like this. Please be, be patient with us, please. Uh, we’re just beginning. We are just now beginning.

And, I can tell you on behalf of the Sheriff, and the Police Chief, so many other partners, um, that have stood with us over this period of time — that WE. WILL. NOT. STOP.




CAPTAIN DAVE BURSTON
I just unveiled the person that we believe responsible for the murder of the these two little girls. So, I invite media to take a look at that now. Kim —

[ The new sketch is revealed. ]

CAPTAIN DAVE BURSTON
We’re also going to show you a video not previously released — that Superintendent spoke to — and also the audio, that’s additional to what’s been previously released. It’s only a slight change in it.

THE AUDIO >>> “Guys… [pause] down the hill.”



PODCAST HOST BARBARA MACDONALD AND HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS DISCUSS THEIR EXPERIENCE ATTENDING THE PRESS CONFERENCE.


HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
That was intense.
I was there and I thought, for sure, Carter was coming off that stage after somebody. When he ended his sentence and he was done, he walked away from that podium like he owned it. And, I thought, “Oh my gosh, Bridge Guy was dumb enough to show up here. He’s gonna go and choke somebody out.”

That’s actually what I thought and everybody just gasped. It was, it was pretty unreal.



PODCAST HOST ANDREW IDEN

You and Susan Hendricks from HLN, who’s with us here in the writer’s room, get a text message. Can you tell us about — or walk us through learning about April 22nd.

PODCAST HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
Yes, so I was working on another show. Uh, I don’t even remember what story I was doing that day, but I get a text message from one of my sources in Delphi saying, “Can’t tell you why but you need to be here Monday.” And so, we went.

PODCAST HOST ANDREW IDEN
Take us back to the room.

HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
Oh, man.

PODCAST HOST ANDREW IDEN
You know... what was the feeling? What was the vibe? Was the, you know, was there tension? Kind of walk us through that.

PODCAST HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
You know, it was interesting because before the press conference began, it was, um, very calm. Um, people were talking. People weren’t particularly nervous. People, I think, were excited about whatever was going to be said. And then Carter comes out, and his tone is very serious. He’s passionate, he’s intense. And the room just went quiet. When he was speaking, you could, you could literally hear a pin drop in there.

HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
What stood out to me -- when my stomach dropped -- was seeing the unveiling of the new sketch. There was an armed guard standing near it, and when they took off what was covering the sketch, I was taken aback. Because the sketch — the person looks so young.

PODCAST HOST ANDREW IDEN
Right.

PODCAST HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
I’ve gone back on this in my mind. I don’t know if there was an audible gasp in the room when that happened, but I felt a gasp. If people weren’t gasping, that was certainly—

PODCAST HOST ANDREW IDEN
Body language.

PODCAST HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
The air got sucked out of the room for just a second when that happened.

HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
Because we had so much time — because the family was being briefed — we were able to notice our surroundings and really take a look. And I did notice an officer standing by the covered sketch. So, he wanted no one to come even near that to bump it accidentally. But when it was unveiled, I thought, “[Audible gasp], that looks like a kid!”

PODCAST HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
Yeah, even though Superintendent Carter had said, you know, he could be as young as 18 — to see the sketch and to see what a young face that is was shocking.

HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
I thought -- “Did he know these girls? Was he their friend?”
That’s how young he looked.


PODCAST HOST ANDREW IDEN
And vastly different from the original —

PODCAST HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
Wayyy...

HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
COMPLETELY different.

DTH HOST ANDREW IDEN
When you watch the news conference, you can only see, you know, what’s in the frame. But you guys were in the room and I’m curious — especially when he said, “to the killer, who may be in this room” — what was the feeling inside the room, especially at that moment?

HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
For me, we couldn’t get any closer. Barbara and I were sitting right on the carpeting right in the front.

HLN HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
We were on the floor on the front row.

HLP REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
It was a packed room. Media outlets, armed police officers everywhere — I did notice that — and it was packed. We were in the front row, and I thought in my head -- “In this room?” It took awhile for it to really resonate with me. Thinking -- “Oh my gosh, he could be in this room.”

It took me a while for me to process exactly what he was saying.


HLN HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
And there were a lot of people who -- when Superintendent Carter and Sheriff Leazenby walk off and they leave, they left that room. You didn’t see them after that. I certainly thought — “They’re going to get the guy. They are jumping in their car right now, and they are going to wherever this person is and they’re making that arrest.”

HLP REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
A photojournalist with CNN who was there with us said to me — once I stood up and walked back in this room — “In this? Here in this room? What is going on -- in this room?”

They were shocked, and they see a lot and hear a lot. And they were thinking -- "He’s here?" — looking around for him.


HLN HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
They certainly disrupted everything that day. This press conference just turned everything upside down.

HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
I thought what you thought. That when he left — they’re going to arrest someone. Because a mention of that car also stood out to me without the make and the model. And, obviously, there is a wall of silence that we’ve experienced there. Because they don’t want false confessions. That silence also allows for a lot of speculation.

DTH HOST ANDREW IDEN
So, coupled with the new sketch, you’ve got the new audio —

HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
Did you notice during the press conference how much Superintendent Carter prefaced it’s the same voice? -- “Keep that in mind, it is the same voice.”

Because they sound so different.


DTH HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
They do.

HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
And I think the ‘guys’ sounds very young. Completely different than ‘Down the hill’. It sounds like two different voices; he said it’s one. I use ‘guys’ all the time in a casual manner. To me, it says friendly speak.

DTH HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
We also don’t know -- just because they added ‘guys’ before ‘down the hill’, we don’t know if that is said in any particular order. They haven’t given us any indication of that. We know that all of that was said on the video that Libby made, but we don’t know where in the video, how far apart it might be.

And that was another element of the press conference — it was a little unusual. They invited the public, but they also took everyone’s name as you walked in. And it was interesting because I thought -- "Okay, if you really think he’s going to be here, wouldn’t you maybe ask for an ID?” They weren’t doing that.


HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
But they made sure that you -- you had to sign in.

DTH HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
So, that was an interesting part of the process. You don’t normally sign into something like that unless you’re there for the president or somewhere you need a security clearance to get into to. That wasn’t the case, but they definitely were taking everyone’s name.

HLN REPORTER SUSAN HENDRICKS
And looking back now, in hindsight, when you say something like that — “He could be in this room... he's from Delphi or he’s worked here... he's been hiding in plain sight” — the next morning, that was the cover of the newspaper. Hiding In Plain Sight and his sketch. When you say something like that, speculation, of course, is going to start right away. Why were they signing them in? Did you look at each door? Did you look behind you? What did you hear? What did you think? And then, nothing and no arrest.




CARRIE TIMMONS
Well, it was shock. About everybody’s mouths were hanging on the ground, you know. Like, at first, there was, there was anger. Because the first thing that goes thru your mind is — “Are you kidding me?” We have just spent two years pushing this guy, you know. When they first said -- “Okay, there’s a new sketch.”

It took a little while, but after you think about it, after we thought about it and they had talked to us some — and you think about it, and uh, it’s like -- well, at least we know something’s happening.

Something has happened. There’s, they’ve gotten some information or something that has changed where they’re going and to bring out this sketch. So, we know, at least, we’re closer than what we were. Because they have to have something to switch everything up. So, that’s the only thing that I can hang my hat on.





MIKE PATTY
If you really listen to it, it’s almost like a different, like a different demeanor of the person. Meaning like — “guys” — and then it becomes a little more directive — “down the hill”. You know, it’s almost like, and like, I’ll say — “Hey guys, what’s going on today?” And, then I give you a directive — “down the hill”. The person changed from being social to a directive. That’s the only difference that I really hear in that.

DTH HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
And when they changed from saying that it was somebody 40- to 50-years-old to somebody who could be as young as 18, what did you think about that?

MIKE PATTY
I don’t know the information, again, that they have. That they’re basing that on. And, I’m hoping they have information that would substantiate what they’ve said, which is 18 to 40. But I think they left us such a wide range because they don’t ever want to get backed into the corner, per se. Of saying -- “Okay, you said he was 25 to 45 and this guy is 23 when it happened.” Therefore, you know, it, they’re just not going to do that. I think they’re going to leave such a wide range in age there for that purpose.




DIANE ERSKINE
Honestly, I was shocked. I really was. Because that sketch, to me, is a person who looks so much different than the first sketch that came out. Although, other people said -- “Well, if you look at them closely though or overlay them, you can find some similarities.”

But I guess, personally, I see — one has facial hair, one does not have facial hair. Um, one had longer hair, and one had shorter hair. So, that still of course, opens the possibility that there was more than one person out there that day. And that’s something we have to, we have to entertain, I guess. That idea that there could’ve been more than one person, and that’s why there are two different sketches — is that maybe there were two people out there. I don’t know. I honestly don’t know. I’m not sharing something that’s, that we’ve learned. I’m just saying we don’t know.





ERICA GIBSON
People were already posting who they thought it was throughout our school.

DTH HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
Pictures of local boys? Teens, men?

ERICA GIBSON
Yes. People, people that would’ve been like a sophomore or senior when they were in 8th grade. And, I mean, immediately people started to throw people out, and I don’t know I feel. Like, it’s not a bad thing if he’s around here. We’re just that much closer to getting him. I mean, that if they actually truly believe that.

DTH HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
Does it make you look at your friends, and classmates, and neighbors differently?

ERICA GIBSON
Um, nobody in my class have I ever looked at differently or anybody, um, who was a senior, um, this year. There’s some people in Delphi that I have looked at differently because they’ve always put off that vibe to me — like a creepy vibe. And like, I mean, everybody does. I mean, you see somebody and you think -- “Oh, they’re a little creep like —"




LISA DELANEY
Oh my Lordy, there was almost absolute pandemonium. I mean, people were like freaking out. Especially when they said that they believe that they’ve already interviewed that person and they’re here. That was, I mean, it didn’t create panic. But it was almost like, I don’t even know the right way to describe it. It, people were like -- “We are going to find that person”.

It was a new, you know -- "If they’re here still, he’s gonna be brought out." That was almost, it wasn’t a fear. It was almost more aggressive, you know. You can see that, I mean, when people would talk about it in the grocery store, in church. In church, you’d walk into church right after, and people were standing there and they would say --"They’ve already interviewed him; they know that he’s still here. They feel like he’s still here." The brows all went down — “We’re gonna find him”.

It’s like BOOM! I think we created what we intended to create, right? So, that was where it was at. It was more a rejuvenation of let’s find this person, you know. I think there’s a whole lot of confusion. Because a lot of people are like — “That doesn’t look at all like the first one! Whaaaat?”

So, there was a whole lot of --“What is going on?” That kind of thing. And then they said they really still want to find this person for questioning because they think that maybe he could’ve saw the person. And it’s like, you know, but there was a whole lot of -- “Where did this come from?” You know, so if we had this possible information two years ago, is it possible we could’ve seen the guy standing at the grocery store, you know? But, I mean, that’s, they, they’ve kinda handled it with more confusion than anything else. But there’s, there’s definitely a positive attitude. There’s not a negative. It’s, it’s definitely a positive attitude about it.




KELSI GERMAN
I think it was crazy for us because we all kind of trust each other since we all know each other. Um, so even some of my friends were getting turned in. They were saying -- “Kels, I promise this wasn’t me. I didn’t do this.” Because they were worried because they got turned in that I would think badly of them, I’m assuming. But I don’t — I’m glad that they got turned in or looked into. Um, I love my friends, but I would turn them in if I thought they did it.




AMY BROWN
I’ve always believed it was someone local. Just to know, just to know the trail system. Just to be able to get away with it for so long, so to speak. I think he had to be someone local, and so for me, I think just hearing the words was like validation. But we’ve always thought that, so it’s, it wasn’t, it wasn’t a huge shock to us, you know. It did make us make sure our doors were locked an extra couple times and things like that, but overall it didn’t change much for us.

DTH HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
And do you look at the sketches or the video — the stills from that video — and do you see anybody you recognize?

AMY BROWN
I, I will be honest. I have sent in tips, um, because you know what, no tip can go on unlooked at. And even if I’m wrong, then I’m wrong. No harm, no foul. You know, um, I know that.

DTH HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
So, without telling us the person, what have you called police and said?

AMY BROWN
Um, just, you know, somebody that matches the sketch or, you know, could resemble them. Um, maybe some shady dealings. Maybe, you know, more of a recluse. Things like that, that I feel like would be this person. You know, I have my own profile in my head, you know. Because we haven’t gotten a great profile of what this person could be. So, it’s kind of, you know, you play around in your head. And you just, one day I woke up and I thought — “What was, what was that kids name?” And that’s exactly what I did. I said, and as you go on, you put things together. And I have some, some, some friends that were like just send it in and so I just did. It’s not going to hurt anything. If they talk to him, that’s great, and if —

DTH HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
If it’s not him, you didn’t do anything wrong.

AMY BROWN
And there’s no problems, and I think that’s how most of the people in town look at it.





MIKE PATTY
I do think he’s been here before just because of the layout of the, of the land around there. It’s hard for me to wrap my head around somebody being able to go to a place. That’s what I try to do to myself -- put myself in this person’s shoes. Would I go to a strange place that I’ve never been to before, never been to, and try to pull something like this off? My gosh, that’s, that’s a huge risk not knowing where you’re going. You know, go down the hill and then you’ve got a creek involved. And, how deep is it? It’s cold. It’s February the 13th. The water’s gotta be lower than 40 degrees. Do you go in over your head? I mean, so the person, my opinion, probably has to know a little bit about the layout of the property, of the ground.





CYNTHIA ROSSI
Once they said, in the press conference, that he was a local and he knew the area, that was just a weird feeling for me. Because Delphi’s like this picture perfect town, and the fact that there could be so much evil. And it felt like this was almost like the town secret. Like, the person who did this was just hiding in the shadows, waiting for their debut. And to them, maybe they feel that they’ve succeeded, but to this community it’s not a joke. It’s serious and it’s something that has just made our community stronger.




SHERIFF TOBE LEAZENBY
The simplest way for me to explain it is — it was matter of the, the, our core group of investigators, circling back around and saying — “Plan A, to a certain degree , is not working. So, let’s, let’s rethink this. And, you know, fortunately, our investigators said, “Okay, here’s — this is Plan B.”


Basically, from the information that we were receiving from the public -- we got some information that this person was, was seen there. Basically, we had information on the first one. We made the decision -- that we think, that this one is more the, the second picture that was put out in April is more of a scenario of who we think may be more involved than the other one. We are not saying that the first one is not him. With the information that we’ve gotten in tips and, uh, interviews we’ve been having over the last two years -- that we feel that this face may be more of what the subject looks like. And so, that’s why we’ve kinda changed directions — went to this one and, uh, we’re still pretty adamant that this is the person we’re looking for.




DOUG CARTER
And, frankly, I got some criticism for the second sketch. And I took that — that’s okay. I, it’s all right, um—

DTH HOST BARBARA MACDONALD
What criticism did you get?

DOUG CARTER
Oh, that we’ve had that for a while. And why didn’t we release it earlier? And what else do you know? And why is it being so secretive, being so secretive? And my response to that is very simple — there is a complex tragedy associated with anything that we do. We have to be thoughtful and respectful. And shame on us if we wouldn’t have done it because we knew we were going to face criticism. So, I welcome the criticism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
199
Guests online
3,284
Total visitors
3,483

Forum statistics

Threads
592,256
Messages
17,966,350
Members
228,734
Latest member
TexasCuriousMynd
Back
Top