Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by cwiz24, Aug 20, 2006.
I am curious as to who WSers feel committed the crime. Very simple--two choices only.
I'll bite. What are our choices?
Our choices are endless according to the forums, the list of suspects goes on and on.
Makes most sense it was one of the three that were in the house that night.
I go with Patsy.
There's a poll at the top of the thread.
Well, it's not very accurate, what about Burke, alot of posters think he was responsible.
I will go with an intruder.
oh it wasn't there when i posted. Got it!
I don't think Burke would have been able to fashion the garrotte or write the note. IMHO, he is not a serious suspect. Just my opinion.
I also will go with an indruder. My opinion only.:innocent:
No and that's where the parents come in isn't it?
He is a serious suspect because he was there, alot of people think the parents would have only covered for him, not for each other.
Maybe we should just consider that to be ANY of the Ramseys.
can you edit your poll?
My reasoning behind taking this poll was to see whether WS truly consists primarily of those who believe the Ramseys are guilty. From my readings over the past several days, it appears (on the surface) that it is. But I thought the best way to get a true reading of the forum was to take an anonymous poll.
Well, last I heard Burke is a Ramsey.
There's plenty of BDIs here, how are they going to do the poll?
right...i assumed the Ramsey's, on the poll, included Burke...
The poll says one or both of the Ramseys.
There were three of them there that night.
lol, true.....i immediately voted when i saw the name Ramsey....i've never thought there was an intruder, but i've flip flopped a lot betw Burke & Patsy....IF Patsy didn't, then i believe Burke would have been the one that Patsy would cover for...i don't think she would have covered for anyone, other than him....
Yes--Burke could have caused the blunt force trauma to JonBenet. But, since her cause of death was asphixiation combined with blunt force trauma, I can't rectify in my mind how Burke would have strangled her in the fashion that she was. And if the strangulation marks on her neck had occured postmortem, as a way for the parents to 'cover up' for the Burke-caused blunt force trauma, the coroner would have been able to determine that during the autopsy.
I believe there is other, indirect, evidence that Burke was not involved, but the above is my strongest reason.
Yeah I used to alternate between BDI and PDI.
I believe both parents would definitely cover for their son, but I also believe both parents would cover for each other.
They had too much to lose, well....in their minds they did.
I voted Ramseys, because I don't think a random intruder killed JBR. I think PR was covering for something that happened that night that would have made her world come crashing down if it came to light. As for whether or not she did the act...jury's still out. But she is guilty of at least the coverup. Question is for whom?
Separate names with a comma.