I didn't see any prior sex related arrest in the Indiana records. And from what the attorney that was on the thread earlier with us said, you cannot convict a dead person.
Exactly! That's why I'm thinking that article had no authority to call him a convicted sex offender.
Not convicted but self confessed sex offender and kidnapper and being investigated for other offences.
I think he had four felony charges at different times but some were plead guilty to as misdemeanors but not all of them IIRC. I did copy them into here from mycase. But not all the individual detail. A couple he took to appeal so not sure on the outcome. He was not allowed to have a gun, I know that, not that it stopped him obviously. I'll see if I can bring forward just the four instances he was charged with felonies and we can go from there.
Forget what I posted. He should have had DNA taken for the felony residential entry at least:
Good on you picking that up!!!!!
Yeah, wasn't he in Walmart at the time so it was his warped sense of humour - a kidnapper, rapist and possible murderer walking around plainly in view in Walmart. Big ego the guy has. IMO.
Scars from a bite? (uh, somebody already posted this, but I hadn't read that far yet.) So, how about missing the tip of a finger? The GSK wore gloves so LE did not know he was missing part of one finger, when they tried to lift prints. Or something about his feet causing a wear pattern on his shoes, similar to shoe prints found at scene? Even more specific....his dental impressions....maybe he bit one of the victim/s. I think I better stop....I just saw that @mindyourbiscuits also brought up the bite marks....I just got off work and (you, yes you!) great sleuths are all over the autopsy request. Oh heck maybe they just want to find out if he held his weapon with his left or right hand?
