http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/10/judge_delays_terri_and_kaine_h.html Kaine Horman's lawyer, Laura Rackner, said Terri Horman's request for a delay is not in the children's best interest but is "about her concerns and what she wants for herself." She cautioned the divorce could be delayed indefinitely, and that would hurt the children. "In this case, we don't even have an indictment, so we don't even have a limit as to how long this can go on," Rackner argued. Does KH's divorce attorney have inside info regarding the Grand Jury's conclusion (if, in fact, the GJ has even reached a conclusion)? IMO, it would seem that she (Rackner) has at least come to her own conclusion (based on this statement, inside info or not) and it would also seem that she has reasoned that the GJ has not delivered an indictment against TMH at this time. What I wonder is: based on this statement by Rackner, does she have inside info, or is she basing her statement on what she has read in the MSM?