I am sick of the Ramsey investigation and here's why. John Mark Karr confessed to the murder and I'd be one of the first people to say that I had doubts about him as a suspect. HOWEVER..... the charges against him were dropped - officially because his DNA didn't match and .... (this was almost an aside) because they couldn't place him in Boulder at the time of the killing. Now, Mary Lacy stood up at that press conference and said that the DNA might not be the killer's but that according to Karr's story, if he was the killer, it "had to be his". This is what frustrates me - since WHEN was the word of a perp taken as gospel? Is this what is wrong with the Ramsey investigation? Are the investigators simply taking suspects at their word? Call me cynical, but I just think that Mary Lacy is being less than truthful when she says Karr was exonerted because his DNA didn't match and that *in fact* the strength of his alibis was the stronger reason why the charges were dropped against him. And the bottom line is this - supposing the DNA really isn't the intruders? i.e. that it is in fact an artefact and will never be matched to a likely perp. All the real perp has to say now is that he did what John Mark Karr did to JonBenet - so that according to ANY perp's story, the DNA would "have to be his" and Mary Lacy will simply let him free.... This case has become a joke.