Is the molester also the killer?

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by Toltec, Mar 29, 2007.

  1. Toltec

    Toltec New Member

    Messages:
    1,644
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As you all know by now, my belief is that Patsy killed JonBenet but the molestation of JonBenet Ramsey has me stumped. Several people have asked me who I think molested JonBenet and I've said I did not know...but that it was one of the Ramseys.

    Let's start with the month of December when Linda Hoffman Pugh stated that JB started wetting the bed all over again.

    JonBenet went to see the school nurse on a couple of Mondays in December.

    Something happened to JB on the 23d of December.

    JonBenet was molested the night she died

    Does anyone have a theory on who was molesting JonBenet...I sure want to know.
     
  2. Loading...


  3. rashomon

    rashomon New Member

    Messages:
    1,670
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The crucial question is: was JonBenet actually molested the night she died or was the acute vaginal injury inflicted for staging purposes?
     
  4. JMO8778

    JMO8778 ..at the beach!

    Messages:
    5,554
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    If it wasn't JR,then I wonder if it was PR's father.It was said he babysat the kids,and PR's mom lived in Atlanta..not with him.He was also at the party that night,but went to atlanta on a standby flight on xmas eve.
    I wonder if he sat w JB and BR while JR and PR were out on those weekends b/f JB saw the school nurse.
     
  5. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,165
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    rashomon,

    How about two sexual assaults and yes to both of your questions.

    That is in the days leading up to her death JonBenet was being sexually molested on a regular basis, her severely eroded hymen and prior vaiginal scarring support this.

    On the night of her death she was subject to a sexual assault which was followed by a manual strangulation, which may have been a consequence of keeping JonBenet quiet during the assault?

    As you suggest there may have been a further sexual assault undertaken during a staging to fake an abduction motive and/or mask the prior sexual assault.

    Two points Coroner Meyer mentions a digital penetration and sexual activity which are imo neutral euphemisms for different kinds of sexual molestation.

    The above points will be reinforced if it is shown she was assaulted with the missing paintbrush handle, and the staging aspect demonstrated if the missing piece of the paintbrush was left inside JonBenet?

    As I've mentioned before why leave the other two pieces but remove the third, one was actually placed back into the paint-tote!


    .
     
  6. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,165
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    JMO8778,

    It may have been all of them, at different points in time?
     
  7. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,165
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Toltec,

    Any of the males she came in close contact with, then her mother. Or it may be all of these at different points because the family was dysfunctional.

    e.g. persons known to us with access to Jonbenet exploiting the circumstances i.e. JonBenet requesting to be wiped down?

    That is it may be a mistake to think only one person molested Jonbenet!


    .
     
  8. JMO8778

    JMO8778 ..at the beach!

    Messages:
    5,554
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    quite possibly
     
  9. JMO8778

    JMO8778 ..at the beach!

    Messages:
    5,554
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    but then the fake sexual assault to cover prior abuse would be rendered useless if it was left there.I think it was taken,along with the size 6 underwear,else why would there be speculation over whether or not the paintbrush caused the injury?
     
  10. Nuisanceposter

    Nuisanceposter Remembering Little Miss Christmas

    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I completely agree. I'm not certain that molester had to be the killer, though. I suspect both J&P were involved in the staging and subsequent ongoing cover up, and I suspect it's because they both had something to hide.

    I also wonder about DP, and his being around JonBenet at the same time LHP said she regressed in toileting (around Thanksgiving) and his leaving at Christmas.

    I also wonder if Patsy didn't know JB was being molested and denied it or something, perhaps having been molested herself. I think Patsy had to have known something bad was happening to JonBenet, with all of the doctor visits and school nurse visits and the three phone calls in one day that she can't recall the reason for. I'm not so sure Patsy wasn't the source.

    I pretty much dismiss "curiosity play" between Burke and JonBenet, as usually children don't play like that hard enough to hurt or cause damage. It's more like "show and touch", not "penetrate and alter the geography with injury".
     
  11. Toltec

    Toltec New Member

    Messages:
    1,644
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0

    You make a good point in that children do play doctor but not to a point where it causes injury.

    I seriously doubt Patsy would molest her daughter.

    So that leaves John Ramsey as the possible molester....but then again, why leave injuries to his daughter that his wife would obviously notice?

    I doubt Fleet White would hurt his little daughters best friend...and Burke's friends??? Who knows.

    I was leaning towards Grandpa Paugh...the only problem with that is that JonBenet suffered ACUTE vaginal penetration...and we all know Grandpa Paugh left Boulder Dec 24.

    Could it be possible that the acute injuries could be as old as 24 hours? What if Grandpa Paugh molested her on the 24th...got caught by the Ramseys...and given the boot??? Is that why we never heard one statement from GPP after JonBenet's death???
     
  12. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,165
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48

    JMO8778,

    No, because the damage has been done, she was violated, dont forget the missing piece may have been left inside JonBenet, this is why its removal is so curious.

    That is whether it is known how JonBenet was sexually asssaulted either digitally or by some other object, does not detract from the effect of compromising the forensic evidence, since you cannot prove ante-mortem which was fake or real.

    The speculation is ours, the BPD may have access to sealed information, bear in mind birefringent material was discovered inside JonBenet, if the missing piece was indeed left inside Jonbenet in an attempt to further dramatise the staging, then its consistent with the application of the garrote, and also this may have been redacted from the autopsy report?



    .
     
  13. Solace

    Solace New Member

    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The following is from The Bonita Papers:

    "CELLULOSE PARTICLE IN VAGINA possibly from paint brush handle"

    Just fyi
     
  14. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,165
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Solace,

    Thank you, the technical term for this is birefringment material, e.g. the material can be identified either by its refractive index, or it polarising properties, wrt light or laser.


    .
     
  15. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,165
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Nuisanceposter,

    I agree and DP was prominent prior to xmas, assisting JonBenet, I reckon Burke and JonBenet indulged in normal curiosity play or doctors etc, his prepubescence would have have been a factor in this not progressing too far.

    A variant of my standard theory has JonBenet killed e.g. silenced precisely because so many adults were molesting her. I reckon in her extended family there was a pedophile who when given access groomed and molested JonBenet, it may have been this person she was going to go public about, but this would have shone a light on others who were abusing JonBenet?


    .
     
  16. Solace

    Solace New Member

    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    UK,

    With all due respect, never happened. So many adults were molesting her? This sort of a statement borders on hysteria, and frankly UK is more than likely going to be dismissed by many as just that. Just my opinion.
     
  17. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,165
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Solace,
    Really, and you were present?

    I refer to the list of suspects, and JonBenet's prior chronic sexual molestation.

    The possibility of litigation precludes a fuller discussion, but those who have studied the case will know to whom I am referring.


    .
     
  18. Solace

    Solace New Member

    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If the child were being molested by a number of adults, we would have seen some record of bizarre and I mean bizarre behaviour by her. She kicked her mother at a pageant, she would walk through the raked up leaves, she would walk through Burke's toys. There is no record of her running up and down the halls at school; there is no record of showing any overtly sexual behaviour except for the fact that she would on occasion as someone to "wipe her", behaviour that children will do at times. There is no record of her having any "ticks". There is no record of observances by anyone after ten years that Jon Benet exhibited any bizarre behaviour other than the pageants. The speculation that she was molested by a number of adults, in my opinion, lends itself to hysteria.

    And also the fact that you say the possibility of litigation limits further discussion speaks volumes. UK, you do not have anything to back this up. It is simply tiresome hearing these alarmist explanations for theories that have no basis in fact. IMO
     
  19. Jay78

    Jay78 Member

    Messages:
    246
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    i must admit, the hinting in this topic that there may be more than we know about this case has always been a question of mine. Is it possible that there are significant details of this case not known to the public? Linda Arndt once mentioned that the facts of this case were misunderstood in the public. In addition, the arguement that JMK knew things only the perp would know makes me wonder. Sorry to go off topic, but this has been bugging me for a while.
     
  20. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,165
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Solace,

    There is no rule of membership that requires you to read everything I post, far less comment upon it.


    .
     
  21. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,165
    Likes Received:
    75
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Jay78,

    Yes there is evidence available that has not been made public, most likely so it can be produced at any trial.

    JonBenet's soiled underwear drawer is but one recent example, yet another person linked to the investigation hinting sexual abuse may have played a part.

    A piece of the paintbrush is still missing with no real reason for this since the other two pieces were available at the crime-scene.

    No list of JonBenet's underwear itemised by size or day of the week has ever been released, so must be significant

    And of course the Ramsey residences were searched for child pornography with one of those searches and its results being redacted!


    .
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice