Exactly....I don't understand why the TDNA is being touted as evidence of the Ramseys being innocent. We don't even have the full 13 markers needed for a whole profile. I think about the Baton Rouge Serial Killer at times like this
In my humble opinion the reason it is being touted as evidence is that it is the only slim possiblity that the IDI's have to grab onto to try to make their case.
The fact that it could be the DNA of a factory worker in Thailand who has never set foot in the US, much less the Ramsey home, has to appear to remain irrelevent if you are an IDA because the TDNA is all you have to cling to.
For some reason this argument always brings to mind how many years Jeffrey MacDonald yelled about "unidentified" hair on Collette's (his wife)
body. I remember watching MacDonald looking right at the camera and saying "if they find out who's DNA that is, they will have the killer". He was absolutley correct. He finally got it tested and it was his.
I am not inferring that the TDNA is the Ramsey's, only that it reminds me that when the evidence of guilt is overwhelming, murderers, and their supporters, have to grasp whatever argument they can no matter how absurd it may be.