JMK's Laptop

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by tybee204, Sep 1, 2006.

  1. tybee204

    tybee204 Administrator

    Messages:
    7,556
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have been reading and hearing about a laptop brought back with JMK from Thailand. My question regarding the laptop is if they find child porn , whose Jurisdiction will it fall under to Prosecute? If the crimes occured in Thailand does it go back to Thailand? Can the US Prosecute him for crimes he may have committed in Thailand?
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Octick

    Octick Former Member

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Apparently, it may be possible for JMK to be prosecuted for crimes commited in Thailand - this would be federally under US Sexual Tourism laws. This would apply if he had any illegal contact with any child and I believe it also may apply if he distributed any illegal images as well.

    This is just my general understanding of what he could possibly face...
     
  4. panthera

    panthera Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    26,409
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I heard this being discussed yesterday, but am totally lost about this law. I don't understand, since he was in Thailand and it's his computer, and he was brought back to the U.S. on a Colorado warrant re: Ramsey. What is this "U.S. Sexual Tourism" law?
    :confused:
     
  5. Octick

    Octick Former Member

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Dept. of Justice Linky

    See especially the second to last paragraph - if JMK did anything in Thailand to a child and it can be proven, it seems to me he could face 30 years in prison in the US, according to this law.

    It doesn't even seem to require that he went to Thailand for that express purpose, at least as I am reading it, anyway.

    Also, from the same site, I wonder if they could charge him with this - if he has pornogrpahy on his harddrive and he brought it back with him from Thailand, could it not be construed as importing? It certainly seems to carry a much more hefty penalty than the 1 year less time served he seems likely to receive for his California charges...

     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice