Discussion in 'Mickey Shunick General Discussion Threads' started by bessie, Jul 15, 2012.
This is MUCH more detailed and has initials of everyone he ran his mouth to!
May answer some of ya'lls questions!
No. No public statement was made. A public information officer told ACI that no, Mickey is not under the truck. A detective told a US Marshall friend that no theory has been discounted.
None of this can be proven but they are the only statements coming from police in regards to this matter that have been posted.
By them not publicly addressing it doesn't signify anything to me in either direction. As they likely feel no obligation to confirm or deny anything.
I could not have said that any better Jkg005! Those are my thoughts exactly.
YES! Thank you!
Wasn't it also said at the very beginning that she took a different route because of the festival setting up and all the unusual traffic up and down that area?
I think it seems more likely he ran into her to knock her off the bike--jumped out with a taser and stunned her then threw her in truck. IMO
"In regards to Michaela Shunick. On or about April 20, 2012 defendant made statements to A.D. "
So are users still sure they want to say that Mickey was completely random and that he didn't know of her beforehand?
But didn't LE state that they believe she was abducted in areas among St. Landry, St. Mary and Colisieum Road? IMO, she could have been taken any where on St. Landry Extension and Colisieum Road without anyone seeing or hearing anything. In fact, he could have taken his sweet time right there and not be seen. I've traveled in that area at night often and many times there have been people walking or biking alone. I understand the appeal of the area during daylight but it blows my mind that people are alone at night on those streets. I've even seen people "parking" at night in the fields off those streets. It's dark and relatively isolated.
I agree, reading that book will test your faith, and also I just wanted to add that Knowledge is key. I would not advise to read the book if your faith is not strong, for even strong faith will be tested when you read the book. I would say reading the preface is fine, a great deal of knowledge on the subject is there. I posted the link before in another post.
Watching the Ted Bundy youtube at the end when the guy stated he accepted Jesus Christ as his savior...Ted never even said the Word Jesus. I might also point out at the beginning he was referring to him as in "we" then later he was talking about himself as if he was talking about someone else. To me, this shows perfect possession.
I guess the thing that keeps coming to mind for me about bike is that when the bike was found at WB, either LE or MS' father (maybe both) said that the only significant damage to bike was the back wheel. I just don't believe if a bike was completely ran over and dragged/pushed that only the back tire would be damaged.
Speaking of the DWT, I just went on a mile walk...the same type of truck stopped as I was walking.....I had my mail in my hand on purpose to conceal my cell phone in the center, with 911 ready on speed dial...lol...an older lady just asked if I needed a ride. She was a nice neighborly lady...still...what entered my mind after that was all about MS and other innocent victims on just how they could have their guard down and be taken.
In April the defendant made statements to A.D .
I wish a local could drive MS route with a video camera, and show the sides of the roads so that us NON locals can really get a grasp of her ride, and places that he might have pulled off or turned on. Someone did that in baby lisa's case and I thought that was most helpful to understand stuff.
Did anyone notice the DT person they refer to as being shown a "line up" in the Lisa Pate case????
IMO this is major.
Who could AD be?
I have no idea. But, obviously it shows she was not completely random for the most part.
I can't wait until the reports release exactly what was found in regards to Mickey at his home. I'm nervous to hear, yet anxious.
Wasn't the man on tiger droppings named "Adam" that posted something about being concerned for his sister-in-law?
Yes, I believe that is correct. That there was only damage to the back tire/rim. But whether that was caused by a direct hit to the tire or the tire being run over I do not know and it hasn't been said. And we don't know exactly how significant the damage was.
I have looked at just about every picture I can find online about bicycle accidents and what type of accident corresponded with what type of damage. Of course, there are a lot of factors involved. But based on what I saw, it is possible that a vehicle can completely run over a bike and only damage certain parts.
Now I think the truck only came in contact with the back tire and the truck stopped before fully running over the entire bike or dragging it. I posted some pictures in a prior thread that shows a very similar accident.