I think anyone who decides that there is an acceptable number of children to murder is fundamentally different to myself. I don't care who they are or where they're from or what justification they give.
The acceptable number of children to murder is zero. And I don't think that should be a controversial position.
MOO
I appreciate your thoughts on this subject and that you wish to hold both sides to the same standards unlike many who always seem to want one side to abide by the rules of The Law Of Armed Conflict and other applicable International Laws governing warfare while ignoring or minimizing the atrocities committed by the other.
Warfare is certainly what is being experienced in this 'region'. I use the term 'region' being Israel-proper and those bordering states harbouring terrorist entities (Iran Axis: Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas etc) who've been launching rockets into Israel-proper since 7 Oct 23 and who Israel has therefore been responding to.
International Law and LoAC makes clear the distinction between 'murder' and 'targetting'. It is illegal during warfare to deliberately target non-combatants (this is where innocent civilians, women, kids and non-fighting males would fit). LoAC also deals with propertionality (porportional does not mean "equal") as well as 'dumb bombs/technology' vs. 'smart bombs/technology'. The deliberate targetting of non-combatants via dumb bombs is illegal (ie: it's 'murder') during warfare and is considered a war crime. Witness the recent murder of 12 Druze children killed by a Hezbollah rocket into their soccer pitch.
Likewise, the LoAC also covers the use of 'booby traps' due to them being indiscriminate in their '
targetting'. In this case, we have nothing like I experienced in Bosnia, for example, where toys and cans of pop were booby trapped and therefore enticed children, vice combatants, to pick them up and set them off, and be horrificly injured or murdered by the resultant explosion. In this case, what is being experienced is a deliberate compromise of pagers and walkie talkies ordered by Hezbollah terrorists, for distribution to their members and carrying by their members for communication purposes in furtherance of their attacks on Israel. Thus they are simply not 'indeliberate booby traps' targetting anyone who was a non-combatant, rather they are/were very much 'targetted' items for a legitimately targetted group whom Israel has the right to defend itself against.
While I am saddened by the deaths of two children in this Israeli operation I am also aware and acknowledge that they were not 'targetted'. I appreciate that the Israelis effected the detonation of these devices at a time when most children would have been in school and thus apart from their family member who is part of a terrorist organisation. As for all the ("
innocent") males killed by their pager and or walkie-talkie, they'll have to explain their side-hustle of having and wearing Hezbollah Direct Line of Communication devices in their pockets/on their person.