Is it possible for those of us who are still seeking more knowledge of the evidence, or lack of it, that led the GJ to vote for an indictment of both of the Ramseys to work on this thread in an orderly A-Z collection of such? I propose that we use this thread strictly for posting case knowledge that can be sourced as verified evidence or as evidence that has not been verified or proved by a credible source. For instance, though there are several accounts of Patsy waking up and finding John in the shower, and then her getting up and getting ready for the day, going down to find the note, and eventually calling 911 about 25 minutes later, since that is only a Ramsey account that cannot be verified, except now by John, possibly Burke, we start instead with: Officer French was met only minutes after responding to a 911 call placed from the Ramsey home at 5:52 am, Dec 26, 1996, outside the Ramsey front door, by Patsy. She was dressed in a red sweater and black pants, appearing with neatly done hair and wearing makeup. She led him inside, where John met him dressed in light colored casual pants, and a long-sleeved shirt, appearing fresh, and as if he had paid good attention to his personal grooming that morning. John led French to what was to become known as a Ransom Note. Now, if we can continue, in baby steps to build only the information that has been either validated as being "true" or validated as being "not true", then perhaps we'll all have a clearer understanding of how things in this case come together to lead us to a suspect(s). A HUGE task, I know, but shall we try?