GraceVPrice
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2018
- Messages
- 91
- Reaction score
- 1,071
Oh thank you, I didn't get that from the post. My mistake.Mickey was talking about her cousin, not Lindsay Clancy.
Oh thank you, I didn't get that from the post. My mistake.Mickey was talking about her cousin, not Lindsay Clancy.
“Brief Psychotic Episode” and “short psychotic disorder” don’t exist in the DSM, so I don’t know what you’re referencing.I've said it before and I'll say it here again. The problem with non-clinicians using the DSM is that they miss the nuance.
You are incorrect. Women quite often can have PPD that could become PPP. What is ruled out in PPP is a unipolar depressive episode, NOT PPD. A "short psychotic disorder" (the classification for PPP in the DSM) is NOT the same as a Brief Psychotic Episode (which is its own disorder).
Here is an article from Massachusetts General Hospital, where Lindsay was employed (per MSM) about why psychiatrists wanted it to be included as its own disorder in the DSM 5.
![]()
Essential Reads - Postpartum Psychosis: A Diagnosis for the DSMV
In a recent article, Margaret Spinelli, MD describes a proposal to the DSM-V committee of the American Psychiatric Association in 2020 arguing for the inclusion of postpartum psychosis as a unique diagnosis...womensmentalhealth.org
And here's another medical paper that describes it.
“Brief Psychotic Episode” and “short psychotic disorder” don’t exist in the DSM, so I don’t know what you’re referencing.
Mood disorders like Major Depressive Disorder currently have the onset signifier in the DSM of “peripartum onset.” Psychotic disorders like Brief Psychotic Disorder currently have the onset signifier of “postpartum onset.”
Peripartum major depressive disorder with psychotic features is a distinct diagnosis from Brief Psychotic Disorder with postpartum onset. I don’t think that’s a controversial statement.
This feels very victim blamey to me. She had PPP and its all chemical. It has nothing to do with her Type A personality.
<modsnip - quoted post snipped><modsnip - rude>
Three children are dead.
A father is devastated.
A mother is devastated now, or will be when/if she understands what she has done.
<modsnip>
Those home visits were really helpful. You can assess things in a home that might not be seen in an office visit. Nothing like walking in and seeing every window covered with cardboard to let you know something is off. Someone can present very well in a 30 min office visit but be falling apart.Way back in the 90s, I had a job (state-funded) where any at-risk mother/baby was flagged and I did screenings to see who needed/wanted to be followed with in-home case management. Our clinic was mostly recent immigrants with poor access to available services. I usually ended up staying longer with the teen moms and with those whose child(ren) had chronic medical conditions. The criteria were pretty loose so it was great to be able to offer services to just about anyone who wanted them. I'd drive all over a large metropolitan area to make visits and in some cases try and track down people whose charts came across my desk. Sometimes it was frustrating (and sad) but also very rewarding.
I myself got a nurse home visit when my 2nd child was (2009) born with meconium aspiration - I think it was maybe 48 hours after discharge. Everything was fine but my gosh, it was so reassuring to know that someone was just checking and making sure that we were okay. It just seems to make so much sense (ethically and likely financially in the long run) to have even a professional support person pop by, make sure everything is okay, and refer to services if needed. The US is so behind on this compared to many places, and our maternal morbidity/mortality rates are shockingly high.
I have a hard time seeing Andea Yates and now Lindsey Clancey listed with the others. The others were NOT deep in PPS.I wonder what the statistics are of mothers who murder their own children? I am aware of Andrea Yates. Diane Downs. Susan Smith. Lori Vallow. Now Lindsay Clancy.
The term for parents who murder their children is "fiacide". A study by Brown University says that parents murder their own children about 500 times per year. That's more than a murder per day. Fathers (57%) were slightly more likely to kill their own children than mothers. From the study:
"Close to three-quarters (72 percent) of the children killed were age 6 or younger. One-third were infants (children less than 1 year of age). Only about 10 percent of children killed were between ages 7 and 18.... Male children were more likely to be killed (58.3 percent) than female children. About 11 percent of victims were stepchildren...
Among offenders, while fathers were about equally likely to kill an infant, they were more likely to be the alleged murderer of children older than a year, especially when the children were adults (fathers were the offenders in 78.3 percent of those cases). Overall, fathers were the accused murderer 57.4 percent of the time.
The researchers found that the most common method of killing was with “personal weapons,” such as by the beating, choking, or drowning of victims. Parents used these means in 69 percent of murders of infants.
Analysis: 32 years of U.S. filicide arrests
Over the last three decades U.S. parents have committed filicide — the killing of one’s child — about 500 times every year. The horrifying instances are often poorly understood, but a recent study provides the first comprehensive statistical overview of the tragic phenomenon. The authors also...news.brown.edu
Having their children removed could be a major obstacle to getting help. It could also be a lifesaver for both the parent and child/children.I hope that women and people who are parenting and feel overwhelmed are getting the help that they need. The biggest problem I see, is that while this mother was in treatment, so many others don't get treatment because of the cost, and ongoing stigma about asking for help.
I don't know the answer, are providers supposed to have a "knee jerk" reaction based on this anomaly and recommend removal of children from mothers who have PPP? That is the problem with patient centered care, it doesn't always look at the "big picture". But, who would seek help if they thought that meant they could have their kids removed?!
Having their children removed could be a major obstacle to getting help. It could also be a lifesaver for both the parent and child/children.
Here’s my experience FWIW. Back in 2007 during one of my OB/GYN check-ups when my second child was about 3 months old, I reported to my doctor that I might be experiencing PPD. I didn’t feel depressed or sad, but I noticed that I would sit and think about a problem in my life for like 4 hour stretches and that something wasn’t right. She gave me the number of an in-network psychiatrist who specialized in postpartum disorders and told me to call her right away. I did, and began sessions with her within a week, I believe. I was diagnosed with mild postpartum Anxiety Disorder NOS and prescribed medication that was safe for breastfeeding.I hope that women and people who are parenting and feel overwhelmed are getting the help that they need. The biggest problem I see, is that while this mother was in treatment, so many others don't get treatment because of the cost, and ongoing stigma about asking for help.
I don't know the answer, are providers supposed to have a "knee jerk" reaction based on this anomaly and recommend removal of children from mothers who have PPP? That is the problem with patient centered care, it doesn't always look at the "big picture". But, who would seek help if they thought that meant they could have their kids removed?!
I find myself very conflicted about this case. On one hand, I am pleased that empathy is being offered to a perpetrator who was clearly in the throes of mental illness. I'm grateful that PPP is being thoughtfully destigmatized by many professionals and people who have gone through it themselves.
On the other hand, I'm left wondering who 'deserves' a near-unanimous display of empathy and support after murdering three children. Would a murderer who isn't a perfect example of what present-day American society typifies as ideal receive less empathy? Would there be universal support for a murderer who was nonwhite, who was poor, who was a single mother with no husband stridently defending her in the press, who, instead of working in a caregiving job, was perhaps a sex worker? What about an illegal immigrant? You may say it's a moot point because that isn't the case being discussed, or that I can't predict how people would react in another scenario. But I've rarely seen any empathy for women who kill and discard their infants, who lay unidentified for years. When the infants are identified and the mothers arrested, there is celebration, not mourning. But who knows if in addition to PPP, those mothers weren't experiencing homelessness, abuse, or many other traumas.
I hope that the empathy offered to this woman is carefully considered, and that everyone so readily offering it explores their beliefs on when matricide is a 'tragedy' and when it's a crime.
Thanks for this. I watched a clip on YouTube. I’m glad to see Rusty has moved on and has a son.Rusty Yates was on Newsnation this evening to talk about this case. It was heartfelt and he spoke about the lack of awareness of PPDP.
He is divorced and has a 14 year old son. He still talks to Andrea.
Thanks for this. I watched a clip on YouTube. I’m glad to see Rusty has moved on and has a son.
I think most of us here are old enough to remember this case and just the shock and horrificness of imagining what those children suffered. I’ve always held a place in my heart for both of them. I can’t imagine the horror Andrea must feel. It’s probably worse than what the children experienced since she relives it daily.
Rusty received a lot of blame for continuing to impregnate her and leaving her alone. And forgiving her.