True, we don't know. Seems like we should know that,imo. Anyone ever ask her about that? With the EXTREME details elicited by some of the questions asked by the attorneys in this case, seems like some notable details have been totally ignored and omitted, especially about this time period when KR got back to JO's after leaving him at the Alberts'.
I don't recall hearing one word about that time period. Nothing until the phone call she made, or actually JO's niece made, I believe to JM, in the early morning hours. But that would've been several hours after KR got there. So what happened during those hours?
I believe it was said the bed was made and was probably not slept in that night. KR may have crashed on the couch, but has it ever been said whether she slept at all that night? That seems important to me. Maybe I just missed that.
The niece is the one who made the call to JM (or was it JA?) and then handed the phone over to KR to talk. I assume the niece wasn't up that early in the morning normally. Did KR wake her up? If so, was it on purpose or just by making noise being distraught about JO not yet home?
When KR gets on the phone, she first says that she's worried about JO not coming home all night, after she last saw him at the bar, Waterfall! She had to be corrected that she actually last saw him at 34 FV. She said she thought she left him at the bar! Was she just THAT wasted and really didn't remember? I could believe that. I used to get there a lot. But if so, she was surely more inebriated than everyone's making her out to be, and imo, that should be factored into all the events and her behavior that morning and everyone's account of all that. It makes a difference if she was that drunk. Things go differently when people get that drunk, in lots of ways. IMO.
One last point, didn't they ever simply look at the vehicle in JO's lot that KR is shown on video possibly backing up into that morning? (I believe it was JO's vehicle.) If she had even tapped it enough to break her taillight, there should be at least some evidence of that on it, might even be microscopic, but they could see it if it's there, imo.
I have so many questions on this case, many of which I don't understand how they could have gone unanswered. SO many seemingly irrelevant details have been brought out in excruciating detail, but seems some crucial stuff left out!
Seems like they're purposefully wasting time, dragging out the process, just bc they're paid by the hour. Terrible but seems like that to me. Seems like they are putting off some crucial info until after alllllllll this irrelevant, repetitious, inconsequential fodder has been thoroughly hammered on and on and on. If they have some smoking gun, some clincher, some coffin nail, why would they save it?? Why keep it a secret till later, til after all the jurors are bored to sleep?? Maybe bc they don't have it, neither side, IDK. Maybe the whole strategy on both sides is simply obfuscation, confusion, distraction ad nauseam, in the face of a lack of actual factual hard evidence one way or another.
Wonder what would have happened if they had just accused her of a total accidental death? Instead of MURDER!
moo!
