Discussion in 'Madeleine McCann' started by Taskforce88, Jun 3, 2020.
Maybe due to a "relationship", if you know what i mean?
I think NF has been ruled out IMO.
To be honest...
I was referring to some kind of possible CB ./. MN relationship. IF they may have known each other and have met in PDL. To the prosecuters he admitted to have bisexual assets.
Well I suppose that may fit with what JJ intimated when she recollected the two men she had seen on the balcony on the Netflix doc.
I thought it a little narrow minded when she seemed to imply that, but there could be something in it I guess.
Maybe ending with violence against females...?!
My partner left me, by a 30 minute phone call, so i have to do something vile now?!
Just a thought...
I’ve never been quite sure what JJ was meaning with the “ 2 single blond men on their own “ quote from Netflix .
Was she meaning ..” oh that could be 2 gay men hanging out together “ ..or alternatively..” oh there’s 2 straight guys hanging out ..could be a date for any interested females “..
Is a bit ambiguous to me...but whatever she was meaning could reveal something about the behaviour or demeanour of the men that she and her sister saw .
She could have meant 'oh there’s 2 straight guys hanging out ..could be a date for any interested females'.
I just interpreted it the other way at the time.
I'll have to go back and watch it again.
Have watched again and on reflection am now thinking she was assuming they were straight guys..due to use of word “ single” ..if she had thought they were a gay couple then she probably wouldn’t have described them as “ single “ ..imo..
I'll take back what I thought at the time!
Well an employee of OC gave statement that MN was in PDL at the time MM went missing ?? Resort worker 'saw German child killer' around time Madeleine McCann vanished
Id say it would just be a presumption, sure she would have no idea as to what the guys type was x
Another burglar with the intention to steal some goods.
I think the another burglar to be gay but he was not MN ... IMO.
MN has always been linked to boys. Since the beginning of his "paedo-career" and when his identity was still an incognito.
See for instance: Martin Ney - Wikipedia
And see the video's on this page:
Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect - #23
In one of the films they show that MN said that he was "bi-sexual", well who would have known better than he himself?
However, in the same statement he also said to have no paedo feelings what so ever towards children! He was lying.
And: his fellow teachers noticed that he had no interest in the opposite sex. He was not interested in girls.
Now all of a sudden, out of the blue, MN is supposed to have abused girls, according the "radio" and according to Euroweekly.
This could be correct, don't get me wrong, but where is the source / evidence to back that up? After twenty years of links to boys only?
I’m confused what do you mean?? (Just finished over 12 hour shift sorry if Iv missed something)
Nothing new has been revealed so they don't really have any new info to comment on. Which seems reasonable and rational enough to me.
I'm confused about this focus on both Ney's and Brueckner's sexuality.
Them being possibly/allegedly gay or bisexual has no relevance whatsoever to the crimes they've committed.
Of course not. It was likely more related to the question, if both germans could have known each other. That's all. Never mind!
The witness made this alleged identification (that a man she saw in 2007, in a PdL bar, and also in a PdL supermarket, was MN) not in the first 12 years, but IMO made it only in May 2019 IMO upon seeing a MN photo in the S.Mirror.