Marlene Baker's testimony (OC Dept of Corrections)

Discussion in 'Witness Testimonies and Closing Arguments' started by mombomb, Jun 28, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mombomb

    mombomb New Member

    Messages:
    1,437
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    4:42

    DIRECT EXAMINATION BY JB

    She is employed at Orange County Corrections. She worked in the dorm where ICA was housed. She observed her from the time she was first brought in to the time she left in 2010. She saw her on a daily basis for a year and a half.

    She described her demeanor as pleasant. When they did their visual inspections in the morning, she always had a pleasant attitude, even when they woke her up.

    She was under PC status. The cell is 6 x 8. She was in there for 23 hours a day.

    Does this often cause inmates quite a bit of stress? Yes.

    Especially those facing the death penalty? All of them. It would cause any inmate, for the most part, some types of problems.

    The only time her demeanor changed was when she was upset about something. She would cry. That would not be often.

    She was always pleasant.

    She smiled quite often, despite the conditions she was under. Her behavior was consistent the entire time.

    No questions by the State.

    COURT STANDS BY PREVIOUS RULING - NOT RELEVANT OR MATERIAL

    If the State objects due to relevancy, I would SUSTAIN

    JB - Goes to the theory of defense

    HHJBP: Must be relevant and material

    Witness excused at 4:47
     
  2. Loading...


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice