CONVICTION OVERTURNED MD - Hae Min Lee, 17, Baltimore, 13 Jan 1999

Status
Not open for further replies.
BBM

The appellate panel’s decision was written by Judge Kathryn Grill Graeff and joined by Chief Judge E. Gregory Wells. Judge Stuart R. Berger, who vigorously questioned the lawyers for both Lee and Syed during an appeals court hearing in February, dissented, noting that Young Lee was able to attend the hearing at which Syed’s conviction was vacated “via electronic means.”

 
“We must allow the appeals process to play itself out, Mr. Syed and his legal team may file for an appeal to the Maryland Supreme Court, and we must respect their rights to do so until those rights are either heard or that request is denied; we are in a holding pattern. Any further comment would be premature at this time.”

this doesnt make sense to me
they vacated his vacated conviction bc mr. lee wasnt there in person?
does syed have to go back to prison?!
 
If I was him ,I would flee Maryland. Maybe the country,
Apparently he's at Georgetown U. Note this is before the latest twist.

I've never heard of vacating a vacay like this. (probable wrong terms).

"Syed, now 41, started as a program associate earlier this month at PJI — a program that offers education and training programs for incarcerated individuals and other residents who have exited prison. In his role, he’ll be supporting the the program’s Making an Exoneree class, a group of students and faculty who examine wrongful convictions and create short documentaries about the cases — a practice Syed is all too familiar with.

 
Last edited:
this doesnt make sense to me
they vacated his vacated conviction bc mr. lee wasnt there in person?
does syed have to go back to prison?!
"Though Syed’s conviction has been reinstated, he will not immediately be taken back into custody.

.............................
The court’s order does not go into effect for 60 days."
.............................
"The judges also considered whether crime victims or their representatives have a “right to be heard” at conviction vacatur hearings, as the Lee family asserted in their appeal. The judges said they were not persuaded by that argument, ruling victims do not have a right to substantive participation in such hearings. They said a ruling to the contrary would “result in a huge shift in practice.”"

 
Last edited:
Syed was released from prison in September.

ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — A Maryland appellate court on Tuesday reinstated Adnan Syed’s murder conviction and ordered a new hearing in the case, marking the latest development in the protracted legal odyssey chronicled in the hit podcast “Serial.”

Though Syed’s conviction has been reinstated, he will not immediately be taken back into custody.
 
Although the basis of the Appeals Court's decision was the lack of notice to the victim's family, I think the court's main issue was the thin evidence that was presented at the hearing and the fact that the judge did not adequately explain the basis for his decision to vacate the conviction: "We remand for a new, legally compliant, and transparent hearing on the motion to vacate, where Mr. Lee is given notice of the hearing that is sufficient to allow him to attend in person, evidence supporting the motion to vacate is presented, and the court states its reasons in support of its decision." JMO.

https://htv-prod-media.s3.amazonaws.com/files/1291s22-1680025899.pdf.
 
"Though Syed’s conviction has been reinstated, he will not immediately be taken back into custody.

.............................
The court’s order does not go into effect for 60 days."
.............................
"The judges also considered whether crime victims or their representatives have a “right to be heard” at conviction vacatur hearings, as the Lee family asserted in their appeal. The judges said they were not persuaded by that argument, ruling victims do not have a right to substantive participation in such hearings. They said a ruling to the contrary would “result in a huge shift in practice.”"

So It seems like they are reinstating this conviction ,that they said was unjust , saying a victims family has a right to hold a person accountable , even if they were declared wrongfully convicted because they have rights ?
So No one matters because they (the Lee's) are the victims and the state of Maryland was like
'',your right'' 'if you feel better feeling he is guilty all that matters is your feelings. Facts are not needed.'' So what do we do now ? Segregate negative aspects of each of the opposing sides an start throwing shade at whichever side feel the most righteous or we identity with what suit our values?
Sad thing is ,they were lied to and made victims of the system as much as Adnan was ,they just have not seen it yet.

(Note: words in quotes are my personal ad libs.)
 
"Lee family attorney David Sanford said they were “delighted” with the court’s decision.

“We are equally pleased that the Appellate Court is directing the lower court to conduct a transparent hearing where the evidence will be presented in open court and the court’s decision will be based on evidence for the world to see,” Sanford told CNN in a statement" https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/28/us/adnan-syed-conviction-reinstated-maryland/index.html
 
Imo the Lees are being exploited by the atty gen office because that office had so many fingers pointed at the mistakes the prosecution made in the original conviction.

The Lees on the other hand have a vested interest in having the murder be seen as a result of the only relationship, in their eyes, that their dsughter/sister ever had, which makes AS look like a bad guy for breaking cultural norms leading to the demise of their daughter/sister. imo they do not want publicity to come out on other relationships she may have had after they split, ie someone else who may have murdered her, because that dilutes the image of AS as being the one who led her into that culturally taboo relationship, although evidence presented in the podcasts showed that both were equally part of the high school romance, that neither was a predator who led the other astray. Remember thst neither could bring the boyfriend/girlfrieend home, and at least in the AS home he could not be dating at all.

So the Lees in my opinion want to make sure that AS is the bad guy (aside from the murder conviction), and they themselves are sadly being used within the political system in MD to enact revenge on Mosby who, even tho gone, made them appear so incompetent.

imo




So It seems like they are reinstating this conviction ,that they said was unjust , saying a victims family has a right to hold a person accountable , even if they were declared wrongfully convicted because they have rights ?
So No one matters because they (the Lee's) are the victims and the state of Maryland was like
'',your right'' 'if you feel better feeling he is guilty all that matters is your feelings. Facts are not needed.'' So what do we do now ? Segregate negative aspects of each of the opposing sides an start throwing shade at whichever side feel the most righteous or we identity with what suit our values?
Sad thing is ,they were lied to and made victims of the system as much as Adnan was ,they just have not seen it yet.

(Note: words in quotes are my personal ad libs.)
 
Last edited:
"Lee family attorney David Sanford said they were “delighted” with the court’s decision.

“We are equally pleased that the Appellate Court is directing the lower court to conduct a transparent hearing where the evidence will be presented in open court and the court’s decision will be based on evidence for the world to see,” Sanford told CNN in a statement" https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/28/us/adnan-syed-conviction-reinstated-maryland/index.html
They can't show all the evidence because there is an ongoing investigation now, into other people.
 
Last edited:
The DNA was not found on Hae’s shoes. How does that prove Syed didn’t kill her?
You'd have to review the evidence presented by the prosecution criticizing the previous actions of the previos prosecution.

My point was that all evidence can't be shown, just enough to cast serious doubt on the conviction of AS while showing that other people were not sufficiently investigated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
200
Guests online
3,842
Total visitors
4,042

Forum statistics

Threads
592,304
Messages
17,967,049
Members
228,738
Latest member
mooreknowledge
Back
Top