Discussion in 'Celebrity and Entertainment News' started by maggieg, Apr 24, 2020.
MOO H and M will return to UK after Christmas for Court.
Heaven help us all.
I betcha Archie won’t be going to say hello to his relatives.
It will be interesting to see if any of them go there after Christmas with this pandemic. JMO
Harry will back before her. His days are numbered re his visa situation. He's close to exceeding the maximum days allowed to stay in the US.
Jumping on here at the end but who leaked this letter to the press anyway?
She just needs to face the situation and settle the lawsuit because it keeps getting dire for her.... imo
Meghan Markle launches bid to DELAY High Court case - judge drafted in tomorrow
IMO, M did through her friends
What happened to M being adamant about testifying under oath? This lawsuit should have never been filed in court. What a waste of man power and docket space. JMO
Meg in 11th-hr bid to delay High Court fight that could prevent her giving evidence
What is a Summary Judgment?
The court may give summary judgment against a claimant or defendant on the whole of a claim or on a particular issue if it is agreed that:
The claimant has no real prospect of succeeding on the claim
The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim
There is another compelling reason why the case or issue should be disposed of at trial
The letter was provided to the tabloids by her father.
Why would you say that?
Trial is delayed until fall 2021 but she lost her bid again re not using the Finding Freedom book and not going to trial. She will be forced to testify.
Meghan Markle's new trial date for High Court privacy case confirmed
The court will now need to say whether there is a legitmate defense for publishing a private letter obtained from the recipient and go from there.
I would think it would be a precedent setting judgement to go to trial on whether a third party referencing the existence of a letter voids the owner's copyright right to the letter.
MOO I hardly think MM will be getting a fair trial in a court full of privileged royalists, but the danger to the priviliged class themselves by giving a green light to the tabloids to invade their private letters may influence the decision.
To protect themselves I expect bogus "one off" type judgement.
Why Meghan Markle Wants Her Case Against the British Press Delayed | Xfinity
The court has been fair to all parties. It's simple, don't write letters to estranged relatives with out suffering the consequences. But there was an agenda on M's part and it backfired on her. JMO
MOO I don't think it is that simple.
The desire to profit from millions of clicks creates the motive to invade privacy at an extreme level.
Motive and money enough to corrupt most people and institutions.
Its simple. She said she "knew" who her father was but yet she writes a letter knowing that there was a good chance of the letter leaving his hands. Motive was PR to take down tabloids and be known for it, JMO. There is only one Princess Di.
So Harry lied, IMO
"It also emerged that Meghan, 39, claims she did not text her dad before her wedding as he does not own a mobile. It comes despite Harry admitting texting him in a bid to patch things up."
Meghan Markle mysteriously asks for nine-month delay to privacy court battle
MOO Each negative M article published in the massive Associated media empire M is clickable money.
MOO does not seem right they are allowed to proceed with an orchestrated campaign to defame the claimant.
She said she didn't text her Dad because he doesn't have a cell phone but according to previous court proceedings, both H and M texted her Dad and that was documented.... perhaps H and M need to look at all the documents that were filed to get the correct info. JMO
Texts sent by Meghan and Harry to her father revealed in court papers
According to this quote the media misunderstood (?) as this quote refers to Harry texting Prince Charles.
From the Sun UK -
The documents, submitted today said: "The information in the Book which was said could only have come from the Claimant was already in the public domain, or because it was plainly inaccurate (such as the reference to the Claimant’s husband sending a text message to his father, who does not own a mobile phone)."
Meg claims she never texted dad before wedding because he ‘doesn’t own mobile’