PARENTS KILLED AMBER ALERT ISSUED FOR 13-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER
---
POLICE NEED PUBLIC'S HELP IN FINDING MISSING AND PREGNANT KIERRA COLES

Meredith Kercher murdered-Amanda Knox appeals conviction #15

Discussion in 'Amanda Knox' started by Salem, Jun 22, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Salem

    Salem Former Member

    Messages:
    29,160
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Starting a new thread here and updating the rules of engagement. From this point forward TOS and posting policies will be enforced.

    Please do a review of the rules here: The Rules - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

    and pay particular attention to this thread: Best Practices Dealing with your fellow posters - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

    If you have any questions or concerns, let me or one of the other mods know.

    Thank you for your cooperation and may this appeal be concluded soon :wink:

    Salem

    ETA: Please thank this post to indicate you have reviewed the rules before posting in this thread.
     
  2. wasnt_me

    wasnt_me Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,137
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    While searching for these flip-flops, I found this again:

    Mr Bonassi also told the court that on two separate occasions in October an intruder was seen in the garden of the house they all shared, once by Ms Kercher and once by a male flatmate. They were unable to identify him.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...after-kercher-murder-says-friend-1622481.html

    I remember the last time I mentioned this, no one really talked about it. It's possible that RG was stalking the girl, if this is true. I mean, his being friends with the folks downstairs and his NON-mention of MK's boyfriend in his diary kind of mean something. Just don't know what.
     
  3. wasnt_me

    wasnt_me Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,137
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    This flip-flop stuff might be like the bleach receipts, but while searching the mot. report, I found this:

    It was not possible, however, to ask Rudy any questions or receive any reply from him.
    [389] Rudy, who had been asked to testify, refused to reply and the defence [teams] of the defendants did not consent to giving testimony.
    The recording fragment of a conversation produced by Raffaele Sollecito’s Defence and which apparently took place with a certain Debenedetti gives evidence of the
    364
    acquaintance between Rudy and Meredith and the presence of the former in the house when Meredith was killed; in that conversation mention is made of the blood and of the glass in Romanelli’s room which Rudy claims not having seen that night. These references however are vague and, lacking in confirmation and details, seem to be of little use. There remains, however, the fact that Rudy, around 23.00 pm on 1 November 2007 was in the house on Via della Pergola 7 and was there because Amanda and Raffaele, closely united and together, had allowed him to enter.


    This must be a reference to the skype call. It's amazing how the judge makes the 3 hour skype call sound insignificant. if it is reference to the skype call, that is.
     
  4. wasnt_me

    wasnt_me Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,137
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
  5. emyr

    emyr New Member

    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So I read more of the Messai report and now I'm interested in all the footprint stuff.

    So they think RS's left foot was on the pillow (in shoes), and his bloody left foot was on the bathmat (no shoes). (both lefts correct?)

    They say Amanda was in the bathroom, and all evidence in the bathroom comes from recent activity including the dried blood on the faucet which could only come from her pierced ears since she had no cuts on her body. (and since she said she had an infected ear she addressed that morning).

    How big was that bloodspot? Because I've never, ever seen an ear bleed enough to drop blood on a faucet. If it was teeny tiny I guess I could believe it. But it seems to me that smore likely to be old blood.

    As for the footprints... if they were luminol positive as the result of showering I would expect both feet to show up, which they don't. Only the right one floursced, correct? (Please fact check) I know they said the flourescense was quite weak. If it was a result of becoming bloody by being at the murder scene I would expect there to be more evidence in the murder room.

    The report states that Amanda washed her foot in the bidet to rid it of blood as meredith's blood was in the bidet. They say DNA evidence could only have occurred there with quite a lot of cells, so she must have really scrubbed her feet in there. (however, using the bidet as it was intended would by it's nature leave a lot of cells).

    If the belief is blood was washed off into the bidet, and there is a bloody male footprint there... then it seems to me that it is more likely that someone was washing blood off their leg, or pants, and took off their shoe (so their shoe would not get wet), putting the foot in diluted bloody water, then putting the foot down and leaving the bare foot mark. This could be said of Rudy or Raf. Amanda could have had blood on her leg and rinsed it off in the bidet as well, then her foot would begin to weakly flouresce at that point.

    However, if we are saying you can leave dimly flourescent footprints from having your foot in diluted bloody water, then it also makes sense that someone taking a shower in a room where a killer cleaned themselves of blood, could have unknowingly put their foot in highly diluted bloody water, leaving only a few footprints.


    I find bloody and cleaned up footprints the least likely scenario because how could they not have noticed the bloody footprint on the bathmat? If you have 7 hours to clean up a murder scene (starting your day by playing itunes at 5:35 to get ready to do so), one would expect you to be quite thorough. If you weren't done and didn't want to be interrupted, then don't call Filomena.

    If they were caught WITH a mop and bucket by the postal police... why call Filomena before you have completely hidden all evidence that you were cleaning up the murder scene?

    Lastly, can anyone point me to WHEN Raf's dad made the statement to the police about the sink? When that statement was first logged?
     
  6. emyr

    emyr New Member

    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Also, the mystery intruder is very interesting.

    I don't know if I said this already, but I would expect a bunch of young people who were all smoking pot to be quite worried about the police coming to their house. I would expect all of them to be concerned about the police finding their contraband and the ramifications of that.
     
  7. SMK

    SMK New Member

    Messages:
    7,952
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, that is very clearly Guede due to the jacket. And you can see how close his appearance is to MK's. Thanks! To me, this strongly supports the time/circumstances of Hendry's Lone Wolf Guede. I wish the appeal would take this video into account.....

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article1734239.ece#ixzz1Q6Tidffy
     
  8. SMK

    SMK New Member

    Messages:
    7,952
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    @ NOVA:

    Found this new piece this a.m. interviewing Knox's friend, Madison Paxton: and she makes the same point you have made repeatedly:

    http://blog.seattlepi.com/dempsey/2011/06/23/amanda-knox-she-doesnt-have-to-prove-her-innocence/
     
  9. SMK

    SMK New Member

    Messages:
    7,952
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    good points; hope someone can answer your last question....(edited to "good" points, did not mean to write "goof"!!!)
     
  10. SMK

    SMK New Member

    Messages:
    7,952
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  11. emyr

    emyr New Member

    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You know, as an aside, I watched a documentary about Clarence Gideon in high school, and I remember how much it changed my perspective about bad luck. This is the case that gave public defenders to all the indigent. There was very damaging circumstantial evidence convicting Gideon, but then it ended up that there were good reasons for all the evidence convicting him. Between that and the proven stories of false confessions, as well as the Lindy Chamberlain (dingo case), I try to be much more careful making snap judgements. The dingo case is a very intersting one b/c the scientific evidence "proved" that Lindy cut open her daughters neck with a metal piece of the car (blood spatters found in car and on metal). Her husband began to believe she was guilty. Then they found the same piece of metal with the same "blood splatter" in all the other cars (it was rust I think). And they realized the other blood evidence was actually breast milk.

    And then there's that recent death row (and execution) case of the man who was convicted based on the scientific evidence of arson. They recreated the scene and the recreation supported his statements in it's entirety. They still executed him.
     
  12. SMK

    SMK New Member

    Messages:
    7,952
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes I recall the dingo case and many in the public were on a witch hunt for her, as she represented something different from the feminist agenda at the time. The more you see of these cases gone wrong, the less you trust that justice is objective. Not a pleasant feeling, to have lost much of one's faith that the system works well most of the time.
     
  13. Nova

    Nova Active Member

    Messages:
    19,111
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
  14. SMK

    SMK New Member

    Messages:
    7,952
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This one has the MK part without the RG part. thanx

    ETA:I have seen this one several times, and it is indeed the one which media have pointed out as being "Meredith's last walk home". But 2 things irritate me: 1. they say they know it is MK from the clothes, but I see no color nor distinct type of clothes, just a hood. 2. To me, the figure seems to be slouching toward the left, but moves toward the right. Just always looked odd to me.:crazy:
     
  15. emyr

    emyr New Member

    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I actually think this explains more the earlier discussion about trusting or distrusting juries. My family is in law, and after seeing liar after liar after liar, it is easy to become jaded and think every accused person is guilty. Especially if the initial evidence points to their guilt. The frustration of seeing so many cases of the obviously guilty go free makes you listen less to others when they protest their own innocence. The opposite also holds true. When you then see innocent people found guilty you become jaded in the opposite manner.

    I've seen it go both ways, so I hope I'm open minded. Personally (as I said before) I find eyewitness testimony very problematic, both for proving innocence and guilt. That's why I'm interested in when Raf's father talked about the sink. It's also why I don't put much stock in people's opinions that Amanda and Raf's behaviour wasn't correct.
     
  16. SMK

    SMK New Member

    Messages:
    7,952
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, I know what you mean, I have often thought that homicide detectives must get jaded by people swearing up and down they didn't do it, only to come clean in the end. Yes, true: It is lack of faith in juries, but also prosecutors---but then, one has good cause to doubt many a defense attorney as well. Where there are humans, there can be error, ego, lies, agendas. Have to appreciate how well the system can work despite these many times. I DO think I have seen a few too many "wrongfully convicted" specials, and half regret having done so.
     
  17. Nova

    Nova Active Member

    Messages:
    19,111
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I agree there are miscarriages of justice in both directions (the guilty go free, the innocent are convicted). And I want to believe otto that such errors are relatively rare, but I don't know how we can know for sure, given the difficulty in compiling objective data.

    If your relatives are American lawyers, however, they must be very good; of the people who are charged in the U.S., the overwhelming majority are eventually convicted.
     
  18. miley

    miley New Member

    Messages:
    538
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    RG said he never owned a jacket like that until after he was arrested ...his father gave him one very similar when he was still in Germany.

    I'm pretty sure Rudy said the killer was wearing... I want to say something sort of like a neoprene jacket? I can't remember right now but it was oddly specific.

    eta: Napapjiri.. Rudy said the killer was wearing a Napapjiri coat.
     
  19. wasnt_me

    wasnt_me Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,137
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I'd answered it in thread 14. It was about 840pm.
     
  20. wasnt_me

    wasnt_me Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,137
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    RG disputes it based on the jacket.

    He said he father either "bought" him or "brought" him that jacket in Germany, so it couldn't be the same one. I have to get clarification because "bought" and "brought" are two very different things.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice