MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #15 *ARREST*

His face is clear as day on so many of them...the prosecution/LEOs have done a great job. I remember early on thinking this case seemed so clean and lacking evidence, but it looks like LE was on it from the start!

 

If incriminating DNA evidence is presented today I think FG will cop a plea. And hopefully tell where Dani is

 

Because it took more than two years to indict him we all assumed LE had a weak case. I’m beyond relieved to hear what’s being presented today

 

Probably the reason that he left the store and returned to make the purchase with credit/debit card. Maybe he went to check if he had cash in vehicle or went to ATM machine.

 

You might be right. Evidence is piling up. Sounds like DNA is next. Live feed back.

 

Detective Malloy (spelling?) returns to the stand. He has been on for most of the day.

 

Defense is cross examining.
The first time witness spoke to Defendant was the 6th of Dec. at Defendant's place of work.

 

Witness recalls that Defendant stated he had not seen Danielle in 4 months during the initial conversation. Witness admits he did not take notes and does not remember the conversation verbatim.

 

Here's a link where they are showing it on FB. I always like to have a few links handy in case one doesn't work

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=432061334082458

 

LEO witness testifies a GPS tracker was placed on Defendant's car.

 

Very scary that he thought this all out - shows how really evil he is. I never would have thought of some of the stuff to evade the police.

 

Defendant's vehicle was tracked from Dec. 6-7.
Detective also testifies that Defendant was tracked by persons at other times.

 

i like that they kept everything close to their vest--no leaks to the media--they seem to have a boatload of circumstantial evidence

 

Very confusing/thorough questioning about receipt and review of the cell phone records by the defense.

 

They found the keys Dec 9th. It was a ruse!

 

Fitbit was found by Det. Lehman (spelling?) and keys were found by Det. Farley (spelling?) on Dec. 9, 2016.
LEOs had walked the route from the Met Life building to the coffee shop Tim Horton's, that is when the items were found. They had received the Tim Horton's surveillance information, which caused them to walk the route. Defense has LEO witness admit there is more than one walking route between the two locations and the location the items were found was not the only route.

 

Defense is now asking about the surveillance showing the Jeep and the dirt splatter. LEO testifies the passenger side door handle was wiped down (that must be what I missed earlier IMO). Defense counsel asks if the dirt could be wiped just from a hand grabbing the handle.
LEO witness testifies the driver's side door handle was still dirty while the passenger side handle was not.

 

JMO but as much as the defense attorney is trying, this questioning is not helping with her client's case. It seems she is trying to punch holes in the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard, but AFAIK that is not the standard of review for a Judge in a preliminary hearing. This case will absolutely proceed IMO.

 

Have to step out for a few mins...but TBH I don't think I will miss much in this cross...

 

Defense is scoring some points, but I doubt that it will be enough to save FG from trial.