JoCoKSEyes
Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 944
- Reaction score
- 23
LE needs to consider that the van was not involved at all.
I couldn"t find the article I read today bymsm reporting on what the chief said but will try to give you the sense of it. He felt that within all the information that had been gathered it would be possible to find the abductor and the silver van. He implied if he didn"t do it locally it would be done by the task force. He no longer was saying silver or grey vAN he was saying silver van. He does not have a location or person of interestBBM...Did the chief actually say this, or are you inferring this from something else he said? I haven't seen any report that says he thinks they have enough evidence to catch this guy. I actually infer from what I have read that theiy still don't know who he is, and are still not even sure what he was driving. He did say today that they are working on some high priority tips, which got my hopes up, but then he almost immediately said something to the effect of "we're not sure if they are true or not", which pretty much dashed my hopes. Whatever these 'high-priority' tips were, I don't get the sense that they are instant case-breakers. JMO
LE needs to consider that the van was not involved at all.
Has the Exxon re-opened? Why no dumpster there? Was the dumpster taken as part of the investigation?
I REALLY thought they would have this perp by now. This kind of crime is somewhat unheard of in that part of the state (notwithstanding Grand Rapids proper). It's sort of sleepy, small town America. That is why I honestly thought they would find him fast, that people would be turning this guy in! Makes me think the sketch is not accurate. Which reminds me, what did LE mean when they stated that the sketch was a 10 out of 10? That it was a dead ringer for him? If that is the case, then they must know who he is......
LE needs to consider that the van was not involved at all.
And, possibly, that the sketch isn't really what the abductor looks like. :moo:
Some thoughts I want to share, some in response to posts others just in response to this case.....
This is a small town and we have a hard time accepting "bad" could happen here.... The last abduction I remember that was not a custody battle type of case was Andre Bosse. Her abductor/murder has been charged and in jail for almost 10 years at this point.
I think for those who have never lived in a small town it is so hard to understand why one may do things in a particular way- such as the cash drawer, but when you recognize almost every customer to your store, it makes you have a false sense of security.... Maybe Jessica went to take the drawer out to count it, realized she wanted a cigarette prior to closing and cleaning, didn't even think about taking the drawer out, thought that she would see headlights if someone pulled in she could get back inside before the would..... May not be the best decision but it may be a small town, take for granted- nothing happens here type of decision.
Small town = lots of talk, for every rumor there may be some truth. There is a lot of talk in this town..... Cannot post about it directly on here based on rules. Ultimately I feel like the town wants decisions, answers, and ultimately want Jessica home safe.
That was horrible. I was living in Holton at the time, not far from Lakewood Club where it happened. I felt so awful for Andre's parents. That case really did sicken us all. He took her right out of her own home.
On another note, I am really surprised how little speculation I am hearing locally. There really isn't much information out there, and I feel like I know way more than most locals just because I am active here. This PD had not been good about getting the word out...for example, do they not know the exact make, model and year of the van yet? Really?
Reference post 948 about the van..... I do think the sketch cannot be a "10 out of 10" if no one has come forward on it.
By 10 out of 10, I wonder if NSPD is saying that the witness considers the sketch a 10 out of 10. They had to bring in 2 sketch artists because the first wasn't coming up with a sketch NSPD felt they could release. It all comes back to this witness. Witness identification can be unreliable by nature.
Add that it was dark outside and the van was moving past the witness...shadows and such might distort what someone sees.
Then add that the witness did not come forward until the next day, so possibly her memory is not as fresh as if she had given the description that night.
Now add the fact that nobody has turned in this person based on the sketch.
You have to wonder how reliable it is.
By 10 out of 10, I wonder if NSPD is saying that the witness considers the sketch a 10 out of 10. They had to bring in 2 sketch artists because the first wasn't coming up with a sketch NSPD felt they could release. It all comes back to this witness. Witness identification can be unreliable by nature.
Add that it was dark outside and the van was moving past the witness...shadows and such might distort what someone sees.
Then add that the witness did not come forward until the next day, so possibly her memory is not as fresh as if she had given the description that night.
Now add the fact that nobody has turned in this person based on the sketch.
You have to wonder how reliable it is.
Wasn't the witness also across the street from the Exxon station in the parking lot of the music store?
- 11:00 at night with limited lighting
- across the street from the Exxon station
- van is moving
- witness doesn't report incident until following day
I, too, wonder how reliable the witness report can be. :moo:
I agree with you 100% on the sketch not being reliable, even if we're to try to describe a cashier at a grocery store I do not think I could, especially the next day. I understand circumstances would be different but I also think it would be a hard task.
I would think the van would be correct since no one has said "oh wait that was me" I have tried to think that maybe it was something not following media coverage which seems very slim, then realizing the time the van was traveling most likely would have been someone "younger" who would have a social media site or following the case (without being biased sometimes senior citizens have vans- who may not be as "up"on the coverage.... Again just a biased opinion I have been thinking about.
How would one know if a sketch is 10-10, and why would LE be willing to put it out there along with a vehicle description? Seems this would only serve to tip off the perp.
I don't think we're looking for either. I'm assuming local LE is being used to create a distraction.