MI MI - Oakland County Child Killer, "The Babysitter Murders" , 1976-77 #2

Discussion in 'Serial Killers' started by believe09, Mar 10, 2011.

  1. believe09

    believe09 Active Member

    Messages:
    28,114
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    38
    For 13 months from 1976 to 1977, four children were abducted and killed. The killer was dubbed "the Baby-sitter" because he kept his victims alive for days, feeding and bathing them before murdering the children, leaving their bodies for others to find.

    The victims were 12-year-old Mark Stebbins, abducted while walking near his Ferndale home Feb. 15, 1976; 12-year-old Jill Robinson, taken in Royal Oak on Dec. 22, 1976; 10-year-old Kristine Mihelich, snatched near her Berkley home Jan. 2, 1977; and 11-year-old Timothy King, kidnapped from a grocery store parking lot near his home in Birmingham on March 16, 1977.



    This is a fresh start for those who have been actively discussing and sleuthing these cases. Please attack the post, not the poster, link all info to the MSM source or documents. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact a Mod. Please do not discuss previously moderated posts or any posters who have been moderated.

    Feel free to bring over any posts from the old thread that you feel are relevant.

    Thank you for your hard work!!! :rocker:
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Richard

    Richard Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,169
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I started the origional thread on "The Babysitter" here on Websleuths back in 2004. Since that time, there have been close to 20,000 viewings of it.

    I hardly think that we need to start another thread from scratch and assign credit to a new "thread starter" because of some innapropriate comments that have already been removed.

    At least transfer the basic case summary and dates to get things started again. The way this thread is set up, it is absolutely necessary to look at the origional thread to comment on this one.

    <modsnip>
    This is a discussion type of forum, and therefore mistakes, misunderstandings and certainly disagreements take place. I, for one, certainly do not claim to have all the answers on this case or on any case for that matter. I hope none of my posts have offended anyone, but if so please don't hesitate to let me know.

    Here is a link to the origional thread:

    "The Babysitter" Oakland County Michigan 1976-77 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

    LINK:

    MI - "The Babysitter" Oakland County Michigan 1976-77 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
     
  4. Marilynilpa

    Marilynilpa New Member

    Messages:
    5,073
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Richard, I totally agree with you - why start another thread from scratch?
     
  5. believe09

    believe09 Active Member

    Messages:
    28,114
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The deed is done, and the thread is closed. This is a great opportunity for those who wish to resurrect discussion lines without the distraction.
     
  6. Jan

    Jan New Member

    Messages:
    2,881
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It was very scary at the time that this was happening. I had 3 young children at the time and we were afraid to even let our kids go outside to play. We constantly watched for the car fitting the description of the suspect's vehicle. We read in the newspaper that the bodies were always put out by the road after a fresh snow. The whole thing was so bazaar. Years later, some people thought a certain man who had died had been the killer. He was eventually exhumed and his DNA didn't match a hair found on one of the children. Back to square one. I can't remember the name of the woman who thought she knew the killer and she followed him up north and talked with him and saw things he had collected in a box that appeared to have belonged to some of the missing victims. Police didn't take her very seriously. She had a blog about it on the Internet. I still think the police should have done more research into her claims and on the man she believed was the killer. I sometimes wonder if the crimes will ever be solved and if the killer is still alive.
     
  7. believe09

    believe09 Active Member

    Messages:
    28,114
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I believe she posted on here for a little while Jan-is this who you are thinking of? (Check the first thread for her posts)

     
  8. tfrohning

    tfrohning Rest in Peace

    Messages:
    5,076
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    EXCLUSIVE: New Person Identified In Oakland County Child Killer Case

    POSTED: Wednesday, May 18, 2011
    UPDATED: 8:06 am EDT May 19, 2011


    snip
    There are four blockbuster new pieces of evidence:

    1. White animal hair connects all four cases.
    2. A DNA match from new hairs discovered on one of the victims leads to this new suspect.
    3. Police find a startling drawing at a suspect's home.
    4. A police report surfaces from the 1970s that sent investigators looking around a northern Michigan cottage Tuesday afternoon.
    http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/27944695/detail.html
     
  9. KindraLore

    KindraLore New Member

    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    More at the link...
     
  10. Omori

    Omori New Member

    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I watched the news segment on this last night and was disappointed. Sounds like another dead end. This new evidence is largely useless. The DNA, as it turns out, is mitochondrial DNA which means that it did not narrow down the suspects to an individual but only to “one percent of the Caucasian male population” which Gunnels falls into. The problem is, of course, tens of millions of people fall into this category at any given time and thousands of them live in Michigan at any given time.

    The segment also brought up a snatch of a phone conversation overheard between Gunnels and his sister as she talked to him through prison glass while he was incarcerated recently. She told him his DNA was found all over the OCCK victims to which he responded, “I wasn’t there when it happened.” That response, obviously, could mean almost anything. What it cannot mean is that Gunnels was confessing to the murders or admitting any guilt at all. Also brought up was that Gunnels took a polygraph concerning the murders but appeared to be holding his breath to cause false readings. But what does this mean? Nothing or anything, take your pick.

    Busch’s death was covered in the segment including the showing of bloody ligatures found at the scene and a pencil drawing of a screaming boy said to look like Mark Stebbins. The problem, of course, is that it is only a drawing and could have been anybody. Even stranger was the picture of Mark Stebbins to which the drawing was compared for our convenience also appeared to be a drawing (???). How valid is comparing one drawing to another for identification purposes when photographs are available? Because, juding from the only photograph I've ever seen of Mark Stebbins, he actually doesn't look all that much like the drawing found at the Busch death scene. Maybe I'm wrong but why didn't they give us a photo to look at?? The segment also admitted nothing at the scene of Busch’s death linked Busch to OCCK including DNA testing of items removed from the scene. Whether anything there linked him to Gunnels was also not mentioned. While the segment presented the photos of the ligatures and screaming boy drawing as never before seen in public, the news of these items have nevertheless long been known among internet sleuthers.

    They showed Mark Stebbins's brother commenting on the drawing and saying it looked just llike his brother. What was not brought up was that the Stebbins family had originally accused Theodore Lamborgine as the one who kidnapped and killed Mark. Now, it's Chris Busch. The problem is, if you look at any of the main suspects, you can make them look guilty if you play up on certain things and downplay others. The bottom line is that there is no evidence Chris Busch was ever in any contact with any of the victims.

    What was just as noteworthy in the segment was not so much what was said but what was not. For example, the segment brought up that identical dog hairs were found on the bodies of all the victims. Yet, the type of dog was not identified nor was there any mention of a dog at the Busch cottage. They told us what certain victims had seen while they were there but did not say that any of them saw a dog. If they had seen one, why didn't the reporter mention this? Obviously nobody saw one and the dog is very important because if you find out who owned it, you find the killer. No one knows of Busch owning a dog.

    Regarding Jill Robinson being shot in the face with a 12-gauge shotgun, the segment revealed that one boy who had been to the Busch cottage where Busch molested or attempted to molest him stated that Busch had also taught him how to fire a 12-gauge shotgun. But the segment neglected to mention that no 12-gauge shotgun was ever recovered in Busch’s possession and even if he did have one that by itself, of course, doesn’t prove anything since 12-gauge shotguns are extremely common among gun-owners in the United States. Also not addressed is why Busch would have abducted girls when he was strictly into boys. In fact, no female victims of Busch have ever come forward that I know of. They also forgot to mention that Busch passed a polygraph shortly after he was busted as part of the North Fox Island porn ring indicating he did not abduct or murder Mark Stebbins.

    I think the killer was too careful to leave his/her hairs on the victims. Why go through all the trouble of bathing the bodies and washing the clothes only to leave hairs on the victims’ bodies? The hairs, in all likelihood, do not belong to the killer and may even have been placed deliberately to confuse forensics experts.

    None of this evidence could pass muster in front of a grand jury although the segment reported that police are discussing the possibility. Unless something vital was withheld in the segment, nothing was presented other than circumstantial evidence and nothing beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence is, in fact, very weak. This segment is just the latest in a long line of news specials that surface every few years to remind the public about the killings. All claim to have found new evidence. None of the evidence ever leads anywhere and certainly nothing from this latest one ever will. In fact, police have released Gunnels saying they have no evidence that compels them to continue holding him.

    I think the police might be trying to close this case due to pressure from the families of the victims and Chris Busch makes as good a scapegoat as any. I think the cops want this case closed--whatever it takes. When members of Tim King's family stated on this segment that even if Gunnels had nothing to with the killings, since he had been in Busch's car a number of times and the children had his hair on their clothes, it puts them in Busch's car as well. Needless to say, a red flag went up immediately in my mind. If they picked up Gennel's hair in Busch's car, wouldn't they have picked up SOMETHING from Busch himself since it was, after all, his car??? And despite what they say, they NOT proven the hair was Gunnels' hair--it COULD be. They are going to hang this on Chris Busch if they can without anything solid to do it with and that means that if he is not the killer--and nothing concrete says he is--then the real killer is going to get away with it. And that will be a huge shame.
     
  11. docwho3

    docwho3 New Member

    Messages:
    2,715
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Whether you are right or wrong I am glad to know people are looking carefuly
    at the evidence & thinking about it all to be sure the truth comes out so whoever is guilty
    does not entirely get away with it.
     
  12. katydid23

    katydid23 Verified Juanette

    Messages:
    47,676
    Likes Received:
    2,310
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wonder if this dead guy is the same guy that a recent poster here told us about before the earlier thread was closed. IIRC, she said the guy was dead already, but he was one of the Long Island child molesters. I hope she comes back and tells us what she knows.
     
  13. Omori

    Omori New Member

    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    She doesn't know anything and she proved over and over again. Please don't encourage her.

    What I wonder is if the cops, have checked out what type of dog the hairs belong to and have then looked to see who owned that kind of dog in this area. Since dogs owners are required to license dogs then there's a pool of potential suspects to look at. by combing the records. Too late now probably. I mean, they MUST have done that, you would think. The killer is too crafty to be caught that easily, I suppose.

    The dog ties these murders together so it's a MAJOR clue--perhaps the most important clue in this entire case. Whose dog was it?? It was obviously employed to keep the children company. Why wasn't this fact played up in the press? I was not aware of it before that news segment. Were the police only now revealing it??? And I still don't know what kind of dog it was. I mean, good god!! Put it out through the media and let the phone calls pour in and check out every damn one of them. If none of them pan out then we could be sure the area where this dog is kept is remote. It's really the most important clue they had, what were they doing sitting on it???

    Makes wonder what else they sat on that the pbulic needs to know and which probably would have broken the case long ago if they had. Idiots.
     
  14. shellbee

    shellbee Member

    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Very well said! I had the same thoughts as I watched the much hyped news report. Local media rolls out a "new evidence in the OCCK case" every year or two...usually around sweeps week. :(
     
  15. Omori

    Omori New Member

    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's going from bad to worse. I just watched the news and the the anchor guy says there's new information about Gunnels that News4 obtained from a woman who has involved herself in the investigation. I thought, "Oh, my god, I'll bet it's Terri Lynn!!!" And, sure enough, some woman by the name of Terri appears on my screen claiming she's been trading emails with this guy. I just looked at the ceiling and shook my head.

    One of the anchors introduced the case as one that has haunted residents "since the early seventies." Uhhh...the first murder occurred in 1976 and the other three in 1977. That would be the late seventies. This thing all over the place while all involved seem to be playing very fast and very loose with the facts.

    They once again say that Gunnels' hair was found on one of the victims but it is MITOCHONDRIAL DNA!!! It is not a positive match! And what did Gunnels say to Terri Lynn? Basically, that the authorities have treated him like the murderer when he is a victim of Chris Busch. That's it. That's what he keeps saying. He admits to nothing. He even told Terri Lynn that he was victimized by Chris Busch only and does not know the other people she's talking about but we know that she has a tendency to place unnamed, unknown suspects where none previously existed without offering a bit of proof in so doing so that's not surprising.

    Anyway the emails are on ClickOn Detroit so you can go there if you want to waste your time on this red herring.
     
  16. OggLurker

    OggLurker New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Can you please elaborate on "Long Island child molesters". I am from Long Island.
     
  17. Ven

    Ven New Member

    Messages:
    618
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't know if my case is related or not (probably not),
    but I grew up near this area in the late 1980s / early 90's and a man attempted to abduct me.
    I was 9 years old at the time.

    One of the victims was from Ferndale apparently. I just looked it up and that is ~2 miles from where I lived.

    I grew up in this area 10-15 years later, so there is a clear time gap there, but seems like whoever tried to abduct me was never caught either.
    1. I never reported it to police
    2. I can't find any records of serial molestors / child killers being caught in that area.

    If anyone has more information on potentially other perps in the area at the time I lived there, please let me know. Thank you.
     
  18. katydid23

    katydid23 Verified Juanette

    Messages:
    47,676
    Likes Received:
    2,310
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We had a long discussion on it here in this thread, but it got pretty heated, so I think it was deleted. But according to Terri Lynn, who grew up with some of the victims in this case, there was a group of pedophiles operating in an underground club, and she believes one of them was the 'babysitter.' The others were used to lure kids and groom them, but he himself chose some to kill.

    She named some of them, but they have all been killed themselves, and she said it was done to protect the identity of the child killer.
     
  19. Ven

    Ven New Member

    Messages:
    618
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Also someone posted this in the original thread:

    "Old files...
    I think that a possible answer to who this guy is might be found in old police files. Considering all the children that the killer was able to successfully abduct, I would think it possible that other attempts were made which were foiled or aborted. For instance, is there a report or reports from the Oakland County area before, during, or shortly after this string of related murders it might contain a description of the man and his methods?"

    I am willing to share my story if it would be of any help, but again, this happened to me more than a dozen years later near that same area.
     
  20. Kimster

    Kimster Former Member

    Messages:
    58,147
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is new hope for solving the murders of Mark Stebbins, Kristin Mihelich, Jill Robinson and Timothy King.

    There are four blockbuster new pieces of evidence:

    1. White animal hair connects all four cases.
    2. A DNA match from new hairs discovered on one of the victims leads to this new suspect.
    3. Police find a startling drawing at a suspect's home.
    4. A police report surfaces from the 1970s that sent investigators looking around a northern Michigan cottage Tuesday afternoon.

    The white animal hair believed to be from a dog is found on all four victims. It tells investigators that the murders are definitely connected.

    http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/27944695/detail.html
     
  21. Kimster

    Kimster Former Member

    Messages:
    58,147
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Previous Oakland County Child Killer Stories:
    (Go to the link below and it will link you to each of these media reports)

    April 23, 2010: Lawsuit Filed In '70s Child Killer Case

    October 18, 2007: Lawsuit Filed In Oakland County Child Killer Case

    December 20, 2006: Alleged Victim Testifies Against Lamborgine

    December 13, 2006: Man Claims He Knows Name Of 'Oakland County Child Killer'

    December 12, 2006: Prosecutor: Man Suspect In 'Oakland County Child Killer' Case

    December 11, 2006: 2 Men Accused Of Child Sex Crimes In Court

    May 15, 2006: Raar Fired From Detroit Newspapers

    May 12, 2006: Police Hope Man Holds Clue In 'Child Killer' Case

    May 11, 2006: Tip Investigated In Oakland County Child Killer Case

    November 30, 2005: Police Receive DNA Results In 1970s Child Slayings

    June 17, 2005: Will DNA Sample Solve 1970s Child Killer Case?

    February 18, 2005: Detectives Step Up Search For 1970s Child Killer

    July 22, 2004: Local Man Wins Battle To Keep Father Behind Bars

    http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/27944695/detail.html
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice