Chicogirl36
Fallen Angel
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2007
- Messages
- 913
- Reaction score
- 1
We now apparently know that even though everyone was told at the autopsy that Erin (a 19 year old female) died under suspicious circumstances. Neither the investigator, the coroner nor the pathologist thought it might be a good idea to comb the body for hair, threads etc. run a sexual assault kit (rape Kit) on the body or collect scrapings from the fingernails that might help in one way or another determine who might have assaulted or otherwise choked this young lady.
OMG- I cant believe that- I would think that it would be SOP on ANY homicide/suspicous/undetermined death- What is wrong with these people? Their lack of competence showed in the beginning of the investigation when they were quiet about Erin's death- How did they plan on prosecuting him? What evidence? People watch too many crime shows and read too many true crime foums now a days- they want to see real evidence- they even scared me for taking so long in Cutt's trial- they are up on the processes that need to be gone thru-
Although I personally believe that he is gulity, I have a bad feeling that a jury may not be legally campable of convicting him- what evidence are they going to use? No DNA, hair, sample, swabs,etc. Even the sheets are contaminated from being in the garage-It took them a few days to come over and collect- what is wrong with this small town PD??