Discussion in 'Trials' started by Tippy Lynn, May 26, 2020.
Oh my gosh y’all I’m so nervous. When exactly did it come down that they had a verdict?
Ditto! So glad you posted bc I'm nervous and couldn't have typed that out better
If guilty, the judge will set a sentencing hearing pending a sentencing memo/investigation. He will be held in custody until then.
Imo a verdict this fast won't be an acquittal. It must be a guilty verdict on all counts imo. I was thinking it would be on the 3rd degree murder and 2nd degree manslaughter but this fast I expect the 2nd degree murder charge to be a guilty verdict too.
At 8.23 on my twitter alert from law n court
Yes CDT is an hour earlier I believe.
I was expecting a lot more time to deliberate....especially on the 2nd degree charge. So they were unanimous on that one...not guilty?
Hoping for 3rd degree at the least then.
I haven't followed here but have been following, like most of the world. I assumed, the quicker the verdict the more likely it would be guilty across the board. I hope this is the case and I genuinely hope there will be an END to the rioting and senseless violence.
Praying brighter days are ahead for Minneapolis and the entire nation!!!
Not near a TV anyone have a link?
Fox reporting 4:30on other says shortly....
ETA... Eastern Standard Time, one hour behind CST.
The jury didn't break for lunch today. They were finishing up.
Just to clarify, Tara was responding to my post, and no, I don't believe for a minute that the judge meant for the jury not to talk to anyone. Then again, I'm not a juror, and there may be one that did think that way.
I wasn't "thinking" that the Judge said "Don't talk to anyone"... That's exactly what he said.
The point of my post was to point out how vague this judge was. It's the judges job to make sure everything is clear to reduce the chances of an appeal, and this is just another example of how he's not. IMO.
Being mute by not talking to anyone during the trial won't tarnish the juror,so no harm there, however....
He also said "Don't watch the news" What about reading a newspaper, or reading a text on your phone, or interacting on Facebook? Was that included, or did he mean don't watch the news on tv? Anyone of those may tarnish a juror, therefore, imo, the judge should have been more clear.
I wonder what Derek Chauvin is doing right now?
Chauvin Trial Jury List:
No. 2: White man, 20s
He described himself as a chemist and environmental studies scientist who said he typically views life through an analytical lens.
Defense attorney Eric Nelson asked him to expand on some of the answers he gave on his written questionnaire, particularly a question concerning Black Lives Matter.
“I support the message that every life should matter equally,” the juror said. “I don’t believe that the organization Black Lives Matter necessarily stands for that.”
The juror was also asked to expand on answers he gave about disparities in policing and about the criminal justice system. He said he doesn’t necessarily think Minneapolis police are more likely to use force against Black people than they would against others.
However, he said he believes the criminal justice system is biased against racial and ethnic minorities. He said there was a lot of evidence to support that opinion.
No. 9: Multi/mixed race woman, 20s
She describes herself as easygoing, and a mediator among her friends.
In her questionnaire, she said she had somewhat negative impressions of Chauvin, but that she could keep an open mind and be fair. She also said she believes the Black Lives Matter movement, along with Blue Lives Matter, has turned into a disingenuous marketing scheme for corporations.
She has an uncle who’s a police officer in central Minnesota, but said that wouldn't affect her opinion.
When the judge told her she was chosen, she said, "Awesome."
No. 19: White man, 30s
He said he’s in client services and has had to resolve conflicts before.
In his questionnaire, he indicated his view of Chauvin was “somewhat negative” because he didn’t resuscitate Floyd, and that he supports Black Lives Matter in a general context. He also said he has some unfavorable views of Blue Lives Matter.
He said he has a “friend of a friend” who is a Minneapolis K-9 officer but that he hasn’t spoken to him about the case or seen him since the pandemic.
He said he’s seen the bystander video about two or three times, not in full, as part of news articles.
No. 27: Black man, 30s
He told the court he came to the United States 14 years ago, speaks multiple languages, works in information technology and is married.
Nelson asked the juror about an answer he provided on the written questionnaire about the death of Floyd. “And you said, ‘It could have been me or anyone else.' Can you explain that a little?” asked Nelson
“It could have been anybody. It could have been you,” replied the juror. “I also used to live not far from that area (38th Street and Chicago Avenue in south Minneapolis) when I first met my wife. So that is why I said it could have been me. It could have been anybody.”
Asked if he had any particular opinions about the Minneapolis Police Department or law enforcement in general, the man said he did not. The juror also said he felt somewhat supportive of both Black Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter.
“And you wrote that you believe ‘our cops need to be safe and feel and be safe to protect our community,’” Nelson read from the juror’s questionnaire. “Correct,” said the juror.
No. 44: White woman, 50s
The court held part of her questioning without audio while they discussed a sensitive matter with the juror. She later said in her work for a nonprofit advocacy group, she’s had contact with Attorney General Keith Ellison.
When asked if she felt that would jeopardize her ability to be an impartial juror, she said no.
Nelson asked the juror about her answers on the jury questionnaire pertaining to the treatment of people of color by the criminal justice system.
“I do believe there’s bias,” said the woman. “I’ve seen it in my work.”
The woman also said had formed a somewhat negative opinion of Chauvin. But she said she had sympathy and empathy, not only for Floyd, but for the officers involved.
“Everyone’s lives are changed by this incident and what happened. Everyone’s lives,” she said. “And it’s not easy. For anyone.”
No. 52: Black man, 30s
He said he works in the banking industry and is a youth sports coach.
In his questionnaire, he said he was neutral on Chauvin and Floyd. He said he had seen the video and has wondered why the other officers didn’t intervene.
Prosecutor Steve Schleicher questioned one of the juror's statements made during questioning by the defense. The man had said he didn’t think anyone had the intent to cause Floyd’s death.
Schleicher said Chauvin’s intentions will be contested during the trial and asked him if he’d have a problem setting aside his opinion.
“I don’t think it would be that difficult at all,” he said. “I think I can definitely look at it with an objective point of view.”
No. 55: White woman, 50s
She said she works in health care as an executive assistant.
The juror said she couldn’t watch the full video because she found it too disturbing.
She also said in her questionnaire she has a somewhat negative opinion of Chauvin but that he’s innocent until proven otherwise.
She said she has a somewhat unfavorable opinion of Black Lives Matter, acknowledging that she perceives it to possibly mean that other lives don’t matter. She wrote on her questionnaire, “I believe all lives matter,” according to notes from the pool reporter.
No. 79: Black man, 40s
He said he works in management capacity, and that he has not formed an opinion about who is responsible for Floyd’s death.
In his questionnaire, he said he had a neutral opinion of Chauvin and a “somewhat positive” impression of Floyd.
He said he strongly disagreed with defunding police, noting that his house was burglarized once and he had to call the police. The man said he immigrated to the United States.
No. 85: Multi/mixed race woman, 40s
She said she works in organizational management.
In responses to the court, she said was always taught to respect police but added that she wouldn't have trouble second-guessing their decisions if needed.
“Police officers are human,” she said. “They’re not robots that are programmed to all behave in the exact same way. So I feel like as humans, they can make mistakes as well.”
No. 89: White woman, 50s
She said she’s a cardiac care nurse who lives in the suburbs.
She was questioned in depth about her medical training and whether she would second-guess police on resuscitation efforts. She was also asked whether she would reference her nursing experience during deliberations. She said she could avoid it, and would not act as an expert during deliberations.
“I think I can be impartial and listen to instructions and go with what I’m given and ignore the outside stuff,” she said.
No. 91: Black woman, 60s
She said she’s retired from a job in marketing, and that she has a degree in psychology. She volunteers with underserved youth. She grew up in south Minneapolis near where Floyd died.
She said she watched a few minutes of the bystander video of Floyd’s arrest before shutting it off.
She has a relative who is a Minneapolis police officer but they are not close.
She said she believes Blacks and whites do not receive equal treatment, noting that a white U.S. Capitol riot suspect was allowed to go on vacation in Mexico after she was charged.
She said she doesn’t follow the news closely and does not know enough yet to judge the case one way or another.
No. 92: White woman, 40s
She said she works in communications, and has been with the same company for 15 years.
She disagrees with defunding the police but believes change is needed based on what she's seen in media coverage of racism.
She noted somewhat negative views of both Chauvin and Floyd, that she didn’t believe Floyd deserved to die, and that police used excessive force. But she also noted she didn’t think Floyd was innocent either, according to notes from a pool reporter.
She said she understands there are reasons people struggle with addiction.
No. 96: White woman, 50s
She described herself as an animal lover who is passionate about advocacy for affordable housing and homelessness. She told the court said she recently resigned from her customer service-related job. The juror noted she feels like she is good at de-escalating conflicts and getting both sides to come together for a resolution.
She said she had seen video clips of the bystander video a few times and is also aware of the $27 million settlement.
In her questionnaire, she wrote that the restraint used on Floyd was “ultimately responsible” for his death, but under questioning she acknowledged that was her assumption based on what she had seen. She acknowledged the video may not show the entirety of what happened.
No. 118: White woman, 20s
The juror is a social worker who has relatives who are nurses.
In her line of work, she's had to call the police to remove unruly people. When asked by the prosecution if she's ever seen someone not comply with the police, she said she has not. Schleicher, the prosecutor, wondered if she would blame a person who doesn't comply with police for injuries resulting from a police encounter. She said everyone needs to be treated with respect even if they are suspected of a crime.
She disagrees with defunding police, but under questioning about police reform said that “there are good things and things that should be changed.”
The juror said she’s discussed the case with family members, including one who said they thought Chauvin should not have kept his knee on Floyd's neck for that long.
She said her decision regarding a verdict would not affect her relationship with family and she wouldn't feel the need to justify it. She said she's curious to hear more about police training that may have influenced how the encounter unfolded.
No. 131: White man, 20s
He described himself as an accountant and a sports fan. When asked by Schleicher about his opinion on athletes who “take a knee” during the national anthem, the man said, “I would prefer if someone would express their beliefs in a different manner. But I understand what they are trying to do and raise the dialogue on certain issues.”
The man said that after watching the bystander video from May 25, 2020, he felt like Chauvin’s use of force lasted too long.
He said he generally believes racial minorities are treated unfairly by the criminal justice system.
He strongly disagrees with the notion of defunding the Minneapolis Police Department. “I believe the force is a necessary and integral part of our society,” he said.
The man will be dismissed if none of the other jurors drop out by Monday, when opening statements begin.
Not a hung jury, so whatever the outcome it appears these jurors were very clear on their interpretation of all aspects of the evidence and the instructions from the judge.
I’m thinking nay on the second degree murder, but aye on the other two
I heard on the talk radio show I'm listening to that the verdict will be read in 30 minutes. I don't know who is right. JMO
going Live at 4pm: