MO - Michael Brown's stepfather being investigated for inciting riot

Discussion in 'Up to the Minute' started by Yoda, Dec 2, 2014.

  1. Wysteria

    Wysteria Member

    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    See post 9 & above if someone hasn't posted yet.
     


  2. Wysteria

    Wysteria Member

    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    BBM
    I guess he said it. Do I believe it?
    And...how did the "peaceful" protests turn out?
    I'm not disagreeing with you as a member I just saw an opportunity to express my angst (and a whole variety of other feelings that are not permitted to be expressed here, which is a really good thing).
     
  3. CHERIE.T

    CHERIE.T Former Member

    Messages:
    8,281
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    bbm
    :clap:
    So obvious, unless one chooses to ignore the facts. ;)
     
  4. CHERIE.T

    CHERIE.T Former Member

    Messages:
    8,281
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I agree with everything you said except the last sentence, lol. :)
     
  5. Snoods

    Snoods Flounciest Faux Former Member

    Messages:
    4,752
    Likes Received:
    8,198
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Mom and step-dad were already told the GJ's decision earlier in a hotel room, so it wasn't "excited utterances." Why would they stand on a car and behave as if they were just hearing it?

    LH's working the mob into a frenzy by repeatedly screaming "BURN THIS **** DOWN and trying to blame it on the emotions of just hearing the GJ decision is another false narrative, which have been prevalent in this case.

    Yet a few somehow believe it's the police's fault for leaving a police car without armed guards? They were "asking for" a police cruiser to be destroyed? Talk about victim blaming and no personal responsibility for the criminals! The thought process that can blame police for thugs setting their car on fire, but not lay any blame with the thugs or LH screaming to burn everything down (which everything subsequently was) boggles the mind....
     
  6. Yoda

    Yoda Master

    Messages:
    6,017
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    38
  7. jennapuppy

    jennapuppy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,141
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Well, let us know when you do! lol
     
  8. Oceans

    Oceans New Member

    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    One person of interest in the investigation is Brown's stepfather Louis Head, St. Louis County police spokesman Brian Schellman said. Head was caught on video comforting Brown's distraught mother after the Nov. 24 announcement of no indictment, and then turning to a crowd of protesters and screaming repeatedly: "Burn this ***** down."

    "Our department is currently looking into this as a part of the entire investigation that includes the arsons, looting, destruction of property, etc.," Schellman said. The findings will be presented to the St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, he said.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2014...-shooting-nationalguard-idUSKCN0JG28120141202
     
  9. XXXXXXXX

    XXXXXXXX Former Member

    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I checked that article out and it's from two days ago. Wow. I can't believe it's already Thursday morning here in Michigan!

    When I first heard that Louie was being investigated over his BLATANT exhortations to "burn this MF down", I was hopeful that he would, indeed, be charged with inciting a riot. Sadly, mid-morning yesterday (Wednesday) CNN tv reported that it was highly unlikely he would be charged. A bunch of drivel was being mouthed about how the DA couldn't PROVE that the arsonists actually did it because of Louie. Some kind of drivel about the prosecutor couldn't draw a "direct line" between what Louie exhorted and what the arsonists, terrorists, and looters actually did.

    Still, according to Federal Law, there doesn't have to be PROOF that anyone else acted out because of him. It was/is against Federal Law for him to have even shouted that chit.

    http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/102/2101

    No one has a 1st Amendment right to threaten someone's life, property or to stand on top of a car and suggest anyone else should do it either. It's like screaming "fire" in a crowded theater (we've all heard that example before). If there's no fire, and you create a panic, you're not protected under the 1st Amendment.

    I read a story a few days ago about a WHITE man who was sentenced to 4 years in prison for FB posts where he made threats against his ex-wife. He also threatened to shoot up a kindergarten class and made threats against the FBI when they investigated him. Now his lawyer is claiming "just kidding". Claiming he was just "rapping" out his anger, claiming that it was "cathartic" for him to let loose.

    A Federal judge saw it differently. Dude and his lawyer are appealing (of course). But he is white, and serving a prison sentence as of now. Louie, can't be touched apparently. :gaah:
     
  10. teedie2

    teedie2 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,018
    Likes Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    113
    After these past 3 months or so, I can hardly believe that he would be held accountable. I think "consequences" have gone out of style, big time!

    jmo
     
  11. teedie2

    teedie2 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,018
    Likes Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    113
    bbm

    Dream on!
     
  12. XXXXXXXX

    XXXXXXXX Former Member

    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks, hon. I thought I might have overlooked it.
     
  13. LambChop

    LambChop Former Member

    Messages:
    21,160
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :tos:

    Somehow the rules never change. Let me remind you all again. Keep on topic, don't go off. Make sure you include links when you state something in your post as a fact. When you post misinformation it gets spread as a fact in future posts and we are not going to do that. Opinions should be made clear within the post and a link should follow what you are stating as a fact.


    Thank you, Lambchop
     
  14. LambChop

    LambChop Former Member

    Messages:
    21,160
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Did I scare everyone?
    :scared:
     
  15. Elley Mae

    Elley Mae Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    19,334
    Likes Received:
    21,735
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's the sheep's clothing thing, maybe. idk
     
  16. LambChop

    LambChop Former Member

    Messages:
    21,160
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    More like the "Ram" side of me. LOL I know, I know Baaaaad. Carry on, just be good.
     
  17. CHERIE.T

    CHERIE.T Former Member

    Messages:
    8,281
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I was reading slowly,>>>>> saw your post and >>>>>fell out of my chair. :eek: :hilarious:
    j/k
     
  18. chefmom

    chefmom Seriously! Ancient Aliens!

    Messages:
    4,524
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is just my opinion on the idea of LH being charged with inciting a riot. While I understand that some people would like to say that the "protesters" would have done this anyway, even if he hadn't screamed "Burn This B^$@h Down!" repeatedly while standing on a car so everyone could see and hear him, I respectfully disagree that it would have gone to such an extent. I base my opinion on the preceding 3 months of protesting that was made up mostly of "protesters" yelling, throwing rocks and bottles, blocking the streets, and being a general nuisance. I cannot remember another night in the past 3 months that so many properties were lit on fire. I believe I recall that the "protesters" mantra was "Shut This S&^t Down!", not "Burn This B^$@h Down!". LH, IMO, fully intended to rile the large group of angry people up, and spurred them on with his screaming "Burn This B^$@h Down!" He asked, and they obliged. He should be behind bars. MOO.
     
  19. Muffet

    Muffet Autocorrect is my worst enema

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    38
    :floorlaugh:

    Mutton on a roll for breakfast?
    [emoji813]beat:

    Sent from Tapatalk
     
  20. seedz

    seedz New Member

    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Smh if they do decide to charge the man

    McCulloch is more at fault for the rioting that night than he is

    The decision to wait until dark to announce the decision was just asking for trouble

    Than the decision to use his 20 minute speech prior to the announcement as an opportunity to rub salt in Browns familys wounds painting brown as some menace who needed to be put down ...when a "there will be no indictment..." Would have surficed

    It was evil imho
     

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice