Bench Trial for alleged Murder of Rebecca Ruud Biological, 16 years old offspring.
Based on history of events we know:
1. Sheriff's office & various individuals volunteering for the Fire Dept. conducted unofficial searches on Ruud's property in July, 2017, after Missing Persons Report were filed; no remains were found.
2. Ruud asked authorities, if she was able to leave, meaning she was not a suspect and not charged with any offence. Person/s representing the Sheriff's Office (Deputy), gave consent for Ruud to do as any free person would; therefore leave if she chooses.
3. However, on August 04, 2017, when Ruud was away from the property, authorities searched the property again (Warrant), then revealing that burnt remains were found... but not substantial amounts.. only bone fragments from fingers and tooth representative of S. Lackie; as per Forensic testing (reportedly)..
4. The Human body has a massive exoskeletal structure.. which leave one in absolute shock to know finger fragments were found (tiny), but none of the larger skeletal structure?
5. Pieces of this puzzle...smells!
6. Further, a pre-recorded tape suddenly shows up among what Peat declears was recorded by Ruud, and given to him back in 2017, only he never knew the tape existed.. Not true! Why? Do remember Peat is also charged, but based on influence he's not behind bars... He ought to be..if the legal system declared Ruud a flight risk, isn't Peat also a flight risk.. They left the property together in 2017!
7. Meaning if Ruud is guilty of anything Peat is also guilty.. he lived on the Property where surposed remains were found. He knew everything about Ruud and the teen sharing those premises.. If there was ever a tape made by Ruud, Peat would be the first to listen to it and help secure it...
8. Can tape recordings be edited? Re-recorded and dates change? You be the Judge!
9. Further, a volunteer Fire Chief, now testifies under oath that Ruud told him... "What's she surposed to do if/ when your daughter throws herself in the fire?" Is this fact? All the Fire volunteers have aged considerably in 5 years ,and nolonger volunteers for the Fire Dept. They have no recollection of any details the Prosecution (Brown) wants them to testify too..
10. What's even more puzzling is that this Fire Chief had a memory lapse.. so he never told anyone Ruud said such and such... until last week (June, 2022).
Anyways, those are only a few of the details revealed in this trial... that is set to make an example of Ruud.. Nothing is adding up.. that's when you know there's a lot more going on here!
Attorneys should at least try to uppear reputable.. not fake evidence, this is the very reason why the, Justice System repeatedly faces disrepute!
Not everyone is dishonest, however those individuals that are dishonest, makes it incredibly difficult for anyone to have such a career.. if they choose to practise with honesty and integrity.
Thanks for reading.. maybe it's all just an open and shut case for you -- but look at the evidence presented to date and..the Prosecution is threading water.. trying to build a career with tainted evidence.. Oh and this deputy Sheriff testifying couldn't remember if he wore gloves or not when collecting.. so called evidence from the burn pit..
Okay.. that's it I promise... have a good day everyone!