CATCH THE LATEST WEBSLEUTHS RADIO AS WE LOOK INTO THE TERRIFYING WORLD OF MEDICAL SERIAL KILLERS
CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

Most Important Piece of Evidence

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by K777angel, Feb 19, 2004.

  1. K777angel

    K777angel New Member

    Messages:
    515
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What is the one single fact/piece of evidence in the JonBenet Ramsey case that prevents you from going to the "other side" - innocent or guilty.

    I know there could be more than one, but: what is that one thing, and who do you think did it.

    I'll go first:

    One piece of evidence: The note

    Who do I think did it: Burke (with his parents covering up/Patsy writing note)

    ~Angel~
     
  2. Nova

    Nova Active Member

    Messages:
    19,111
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Ditto, K. The note.

    The note, as written, serves no purpose except to (vainly, IMHO) suggest somebody other than the Rs was in the house that night.
     
  3. why_nutt

    why_nutt New Member

    Messages:
    484
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    JonBenet's body was moved a substantial distance within the house from the time when the crime was initiated to when it concluded. This is unprecedented in intruder murders of children, and not uncommon in parental or acquaintance murders of children. I have to play the odds on this one. I can either go with a theory that has never happened before, or one with ample precedent, and I choose to go with precedent.

    Edited because I left out the second response you looked for:

    I believe JonBenet was moved to the basement to keep Burke from even the remotest possibility of finding her body. And there is also ample evidence to say this is true. Burke was not even allowed to see JonBenet's body at the funeral home, nor was he allowed to leave her one last gift as every single other member of his family was allowed to do. I am inclined to see Patsy as the perpetrator of JonBenet's death, but on this matter I can see how it would fit more with a John-did-it scenario, since he was the parent who made sure to hustle Burke out of the house. If by some chance JonBenet had been kidnapped and managed to get away, she would have run home to greet her happy parents, while her own brother was miles away being denied the opportunity to experience the family's reunion. John made sure this would be true, while Patsy in her utter selfishness did not seem to care one way or the other.
     
  4. BlueCrab

    BlueCrab New Member

    Messages:
    3,053
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The lie on the 911 tape was probably the most important item of evidence. It verified that all three Ramseys conspired in a coverup to distant Burke from the crime. IMO Burke killed JonBenet or knows who killed her.

    JMO
     
  5. Shylock

    Shylock Former Member

    Messages:
    1,058
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The pineapple. That child...was awake when they got home. The pineapple proves that. No intruder who breaks into someone's home would waste time feeding his victim - and the victim sure wouldn't be in the mood for eating after being awakened by a stranger.

    I think Burke did something to start the whole ball rolling, then the parents took over from there.
     
  6. vicktor

    vicktor New Member

    Messages:
    797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The pertinent bit of information for me is that John and Patsy passed a polygraph. By all accounts they were emotionally distraught and devastated by JBR's death. If they had been involved in any way, IMO, they would have failed.(BTW, I have taken several polygraphs, the results of one proving to be inconclusive, although I was honest and had nothing to hide. Anxiety caused the inconclusive result.)

    I believe Gary Oliva did it. Nothing that is known about Gary Oliva is incongruent with what is known about the crime. A sample of his handwriting written 3 years after the crime shows many similarities between individual letters and how groups of similar letters appear in different words. In writings obtained by a poster on another forum he misspelled words with double consanants 5 times( including the RN). His phrasing and sentence structure seems to be consistant with the RN. Some have speculated that JB's death resulted from unseen perversions or dysfunctions or anger in the Ramsey family. Curiously, all these seem to be a part of the crime yet they are found in Gary Oliva. He had been diagnosed or evaluated by someone connected to his past criminal history as having a paraniod schizophrenic personality. In any case, he was convicted of sexual assault against a 7 year old girl, tried to strangle his mother, and prior to the murder had reportedly been acting more bizarre than usual. DNA? The author of the RN stated that he was familiar with LE countermeasures and tactics.
     
  7. BrotherMoon

    BrotherMoon Former Member

    Messages:
    753
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Bible.
     
  8. popcorn

    popcorn Inactive

    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  9. Cherokee

    Cherokee Member

    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    The one single piece of evidence is the "ransom note" that was NOT a ransom note.

    Because of my OWN (and not anyone else's) handwriting analysis of the ransom note using the tools of forensic graphology, I know Patsy Ramsey penned the note.

    Because of my OWN (and not anyone else's) linguistic analysis of the ransom note using my training in the field, I know Patsy Ramsey penned the note.

    I get so tired of people saying not all the forensic document examiners agreed, and on a scale of blah blah blah (which doesn't exist) ... no one can say Patsy was the ransom note author.

    I CAN say it, and I will.

    There were at least two examiners who gave Patsy a 100% chance of writing the ransom note (Epstein and Wong) ... but even then, I do not base my opinion on theirs. I base my analysis on what I personally KNOW.

    Patsy tried to disguise her handwriting, and she probably wore gloves since there were no fingerprints on the note. In addition, she used a felt tip pen which makes forgery analysis more difficult, AND she was under great emotional and mental stress. Despite all of these facts, there is still enough similarity that most document examiners cannot rule her out.

    Graphology does not need EXACT matching exemplars, but instead looks at the strokes, presentation and writing as a whole subconscious revelation of personality. The spacing of letters within words, the spacing of words and spacing between lines; the connection of letters, speed, rhythm, pressure, size of letters and case zones are just a few of the areas analyzed.

    Because I know Patsy wrote the ransom note, I know there was no intruder. Ergo, someone in the family caused the injury to JonBenet, and Patsy was, at the very least, in on the cover-up.

    To answer the second question, I do not know WHO caused the initial injury to JBR, but the person is someone Patsy would be willing to protect ... most probably herself or Burke.



    IMO


    Edited for clarity.
     
  10. Ivy

    Ivy Inactive

    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The note is the only piece of evidence that is positively connected to the crime. Seeing Patsy's exemplars for myself convinced me beyond a doubt that Patsy penned it (See Shylock's posts for the URL) and that Patsy, John, or Burke killed JonBenet.

    The Ramseys knew they had to come up with "proof" of an intruder. Writing a phony ransom note was the only way they could do this. No note = no evidence of an intruder.

    IMO
     
  11. TLynn

    TLynn New Member

    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm with Shylock on this one --

    PINEAPPLE...

    Which somewhat narrows it down to Patsy or Burke...(sometimes I lean toward JAR)
     
  12. K777angel

    K777angel New Member

    Messages:
    515
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  13. Ivy

    Ivy Inactive

    Messages:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ed Gelb, the Rs' polygrapher, is the same polygrapher who passed the five Arizona men who claimed to have witnessed one of their friends being abducted by space aliens in 1975, even though a renowned polygrapher who'd tested the so-called "abductee" before Gelb was called in, said the polygraph he administered indicated the "abductee" was being deceptive.

    Gelb was the only polygrapher the Ramsey team could find who didn't demand the Rs be given urine tests for drugs before administering their polygraphs. Gelb and his mentor, Cleve Backster, took the Ramsey project on together.

    Who is Cleve Backster?

    http://gemart.8m.com/ramsey/polygraph/

    Cleve Backster was involved with the Ramsey polygraph tests in a capacity that Lin Wood described as, "quality control." Ed Gelb ran the actual polygraph machine and asked the questions, and his buddy Backster scored the finished tests based on the numerical standards he had developed.

    Info on Backster...

    Twenty years ago, Cleve Backster was doing some experimenting when he decided to hook up his polygraph machine to a house plant. Backster then claimed that not only could he read the plant's emotions, but the plant could read his mind. Backster took his experiment further by devising a machine that would dump live brine shrimp into boiling water at random intervals. The shrimp-machine was placed in front of the polygraph-attached plants and turned on. Backster claimed the machine "showed" that the plants exhibited "emotional" reaction to the shrimps' demise. The plants were supposedly also able to sense the death of a yogurt culture.

    Gelb and Backster...what a team! LOL

    IMO
     
  14. sissi

    sissi Former Member

    Messages:
    1,832
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    IMO the most important evidence is the DNA that will one day identify the killer.
    The pineapple is only interesting in that there was a kitchen knife on the upstairs sink,one often used to pare fruit. It's a hmmmm..
    IMO
     
  15. popcorn

    popcorn Inactive

    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Unfortunately the DNA can't be dated to the murder. It's use is negated. There is no proof there was a new package of panties. The 10 day search of the home did not produce any such item. It was only years later that the Ramseys themselves produced a package to enter as evidence.

    IOW the panties were not new and freshly removed from a sterile type package as you probably invision.
     
  16. twilight

    twilight Inactive

    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The note is the only piece of evidence - unfortunately. From the note it is apparent that Patsy was involved in the cover up. Who was she covering for...that is the problem? There is no evidence that would walk into a court of law and point a conclusive finger at either John, Patsy or Burke. {{I question if the Ramseys even know who did it, as it might have been a combined crime...one bashed, one strangled...BUT what killed??}} Therefore, there has not, and probably never will be, a trial. The trio walk. But they are not, and never will be, free.
     
  17. Nova

    Nova Active Member

    Messages:
    19,111
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Exactly, Twi. I was hoping you would be around to answer here.

    (Above I didn't answer K's question about who did the killing. Like Twi, I think there's no way to know as long as the people in the house that night keep silent.)
     
  18. Shylock

    Shylock Former Member

    Messages:
    1,058
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Arggh Twilight! I can't believe you wrote that! Absolutely not--besides the note there is the garrote and the duct tape, both HARD evidence related ONLY to the crime.

    Please see the recent thread named "This could be the break" and the article posted in it. The garrote is the piece of evidence that may solve this crime tomorrow if it gives up all its secrets...
     
  19. Maikai

    Maikai New Member

    Messages:
    685
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    no history to suggest the Ramseys were in any way involved. The DNA is good, and has identified the killer by his DNA---it was found on 3 different locations on JBR's body---they just don't have a name to put to it (yet).
     
  20. Shylock

    Shylock Former Member

    Messages:
    1,058
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maikai, they can't even prove the DNA is related to the crime. There is no identifiable source for the DNA, it could be nothing but secondary source contamination or "stutter effect". DNA was even found in new panties that got there in the garment factory or point of sale.

    But go ahead, ignore the reality of the situation and hold on to your high-hopes. Just count on taking those hopes all the way to your grave.
     

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice