MSM coverage of Baby Lisa, 11/12/11

Discussion in 'Lisa Irwin' started by ynotdivein, Nov 12, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ynotdivein

    ynotdivein Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    11,424
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This thread is for MSM coverage of this case published today, Nov. 12, 2011.

    Please keep discussion to a minimum, and take extended conversation to a new or existing thread.

    Hoping that today is the day Baby Lisa is found safe! :heartbeat:
     
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads - MSM coverage Baby
    1. indepmo
      Replies:
      28
      Views:
      5,635
    2. matou
      Replies:
      25
      Views:
      4,741
    3. yllek
      Replies:
      13
      Views:
      3,860

  3. Janeumayer

    Janeumayer Aliayah, I think of you every day.

    Messages:
    2,427
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  4. curiousc

    curiousc New Member

    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  5. Nixie

    Nixie New Member

    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is part of what makes me so mad, the article had one quote that used the word nasty "The gesture came as the parents of Lisa Irwin had a private gathering and their lawyer reasserted there are no plans to let police interview the couple separately after what he called 'nasty' questioning."

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...post-pictures-cakes-online.html#ixzz1dWFql4Fj

    No where did the parents say the police were nasty! They're lawyer said they dealt with nasty questioning.......Unless I missed something that is not the same thing has calling the police nasty. The media needs to report the facts and stop confusing people just to make headlines.
     
  6. In da Middle

    In da Middle of everything

    Messages:
    2,916
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thank you! I am convinced the media is the making this the circus it has become. So many of the articles and newscasts have a sensational headline, then when you get right down to it, there's nothing to support the title.
     
  7. tehcloser

    tehcloser New Member

    Messages:
    15,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well it IS the parents attorney, who REPRESENTS the PARENTS. If they don't want to speak for themselves, they get this.............they chose this route.
     
  8. Nixie

    Nixie New Member

    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Attorney never said the cops were nasty he said the questions they asked were nasty imo that is a big difference! The article misrepresented what was said for headlines, the media has done that throughout the case its a big reason why there is so much confusion.
     
  9. annalia

    annalia New Member

    Messages:
    1,931
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My bolding

    No, the article didn't. The article stated exactly what you're saying. :waitasec:

    "The gesture came as the parents of Lisa Irwin had a private gathering and their lawyer reasserted there are no plans to let police interview the couple separately after what he called 'nasty' questioning."

    Further down the article, Did Picerno say this?

    "Picerno reiterated that Bradley and Irwin would not be questioned by police separately, saying he didn't want them to be 'subjected to interrogation techniques.' He said previous questioning 'got nasty.'"
     
  10. cityslick

    cityslick New Member

    Messages:
    7,230
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Semantics. He said the questioning was nasty, not the officers themselves.

    That type of journalism is usually called sensationalism. They all do it.
     
  11. RANCH

    RANCH Active Member

    Messages:
    9,792
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    The article headline has the phrase "parents hit out at 'nasty' police. I don't see that at all in the
    article itself. So is the headline misleading?
     
  12. nursebeeme

    nursebeeme Registered User

    Messages:
    53,159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :seeya:
     
  13. nursebeeme

    nursebeeme Registered User

    Messages:
    53,159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    let's please move along on the use of the word nasty... thanks
     
  14. MissFine

    MissFine Former Member

    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Moo the media didn't make this a circus.
    The parents did.
    Complete strangers made cakes for Lisa. Nothing warms the heart like love and thoughtfulness.
    Thanks for the link.
     
  15. annalia

    annalia New Member

    Messages:
    1,931
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    HUH? That's what I'm saying. The article says the questioning was nasty, not the police.

    Where in the article does it state that Picerno said that the officers were nasty? :waitasec:
     
  16. Donjeta

    Donjeta Adji Desir, missing from Florida

    Messages:
    19,248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  17. nursebeeme

    nursebeeme Registered User

    Messages:
    53,159
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :seeya:
     
  18. flipflop

    flipflop New Member

    Messages:
    3,088
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If this case got rid of the Lawyers and the media just printed facts....this case might just move along to the discovery of where Lisa might be! JMO
     
  19. yllek

    yllek New Member

    Messages:
    2,332
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    SPIN, SPIN, SPIN...:panic:

    SUSPICIOUS MINDS

    THE PARENTS/LAWYERS VERSION
    The parents of missing Missouri baby Lisa Irwin are considered suspects by police investigating the girl's disappearance, the family's attorney said.

    "Oh, they've told them as much ... sure. Debbie in particular," Picerno said Friday, as the family marked what would be Lisa Irwin's first birthday.


    LE'S VERSION
    The Kansas City Police Department quickly denied his claims, telling FOX News that the parents have not been told they are suspects.

    "We have no suspects in the case," police spokeswoman Stacey Graves confirmed in an email.

    ==============================================================

    WHAT'S THE HOLD UP?!

    THE PARENTS/LAWYERS VERSION
    Lisa Irwin's two half-brothers were interviewed Thursday for a second time by investigators trying to piece together clues about her Oct. 4 disappearance from her crib at the family's Kansas City home.

    Picerno said the delay in re-interviewing the brothers had nothing to do with his clients, but was instead because the FBI had "scheduling conflicts."


    LE'S VERSION
    (yllek) The boys' interviews had already been scheduled and then cancelled by the parents' lawyers. This seems to be supported by Tacopina cancelling the interviews a day before they were scheduled to take place, along with the simultaneously canned Cyndi Short saying if she had her way, the boys' interviews would never be rescheduled.

    (Personally, I do not believe it was an FBI scheduling issue that delayed the boys being re-interviewed for weeks, but jmo...)

    Reference:
    http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/dpps/ne...told-are-suspects-dpgonc-km-20111112_15922652
     
  20. flipflop

    flipflop New Member

    Messages:
    3,088
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Picerno said the delay in re-interviewing the brothers had nothing to do with his clients, but was instead because the FBI had "scheduling conflicts."

    http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/dpps/ne...told-are-suspects-dpgonc-km-20111112_15922652

    WHY WHY WHY do they have so many conflicting reports....


    Kansas City police say Joe Tacopina, attorney for Lisa Irwin’s family, has canceled an interview with Lisa’s half-brothers.

    Read more: http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...-with-lisa-irwins-half-brothers#ixzz1dXCqM4S5

    there were numerous earlier reports of DB stating that she would not allow the interviews because she said they didn't want the boys to be traumatized by investigators
     
  21. Sparklin

    Sparklin New Member

    Messages:
    1,399
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    BBM = reports of DB saying or reporting that DB said?? Have we ever heard her say that herself? I know that some people think the lawyers are just willy nilly saying anything they want, but are they really going to blame the FBI for having delayed the interview if it weren't true? I think the 'interviewer' that both parties agreed upon had a full schedule. I think that JT did cancel the original second interview, but did agree to a new one with that particular woman. I think this had been arranged long before we were aware it was happening, with good reason.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice