Hi Hankshaw, When it seems like there is so much possible Circumstantial evidence against a person, is there any way to rule that person out completely? Like with CPH, if there was a way to do this, we could open our minds to looking elsewhere. Right? Following that thought I post a comment by Fred & Edna. We have discussed somewhere on this site in the last day how info might come out that is not thru the MSM but rather from locals. I found this a fascinating read. Should we take this as Circ evidence. It seems too much to simply dismiss IMO: Originally Posted by fred&edna View Post #362, The Last Happy Hour I concur. CPH has quite a questionable past (professionally and personally) and this, along with his involvement in this case, and the location of SGs pants, shoes, etc. in his "back yard" makes it appear that he is to blame for some nefarious action/s. I certainly hope the civil case against him reveals more info. But, something that puzzles me... Ray seems to be basing his case on the telephone conversation between MG and CPH (specifically what CPH told MG regarding his care and/or treatment of SG). Then, during the Q&A with reporters Ray talks about bizarre stories CPH has told others in the past and paints him as a storyteller (transcript of what I heard is below). To me it seems odd to base a case on someone you are portraying as a liar. I mean, if he has a history of lying then it's an easy leap to believe he was lying to MG on the phone. Thus just proving he is a liar not a killer. Is this just a search for truth and to possibly cause Dr H to lose his med license/keep him from treating anyone in the future? MY transcript of the Q&A: "Dr. Hackett has told many bizarre stories about Dr. Hackett's role as a doctor at his home in Oak Beach. He has claimed to Suffolk County, when he worked as the head of the emergency medical services, that he would perform operations on peoples' fingers, reattaching them on his kitchen table in Oak Beach. He also also claimed he has treated heart patients' on his kitchen table in Oak Beach and saved their lives from heart attacks in that home. He apparently thinks that he can perform these kinds of amazing services in his home so we're not surprised at all that he made claim he did about Shannon. You know Dr. Hackett is going to be some character once we get into what he really did do through this complaint." Sorry for this long post, I guess I had a lot I wanted to say/ask " It sure is good to have you here ;} I'll have to go read about the Capozzi/Buffalo murder.