GUILTY NE - Sydney Loofe, 24, brutally murdered, Lincoln, 15 Nov 2017 #4 *Boswell appeal 2023*

I think that would be a great outcome for everyone. The family doesn't need to sit through that again and BB knows she's not going to get away with it.

I think the family is heroic in their ability to sit and listen to these sociopaths who keep making up stories and intermingling the truth. What happened to Sydney was horrific in any way that she was killed. But, to have to listen, digest, and come to terms only to be played with again with another scenario is cruel. I hope she pleads guilty (even if it means the dp is off the table) so her family can begin to heal from this awful nightmare. It would also make it so that BB and AT would never be able to be in the spotlight again,
 
Anyone know what these aggravating condition factors are?

From: Nebraska Legislature

29-2523.
Aggravating and mitigating circumstances.
The aggravating and mitigating circumstances referred to in sections 29-2519 to 29-2524 shall be as follows:

(1) Aggravating Circumstances:

(a) The offender was previously convicted of another murder or a crime involving the use or threat of violence to the person, or has a substantial prior history of serious assaultive or terrorizing criminal activity;

(b) The murder was committed in an effort to conceal the commission of a crime, or to conceal the identity of the perpetrator of such crime;

(c) The murder was committed for hire, or for pecuniary gain, or the defendant hired another to commit the murder for the defendant;

(d) The murder was especially heinous, atrocious, cruel, or manifested exceptional depravity by ordinary standards of morality and intelligence;

(e) At the time the murder was committed, the offender also committed another murder;

(f) The offender knowingly created a great risk of death to at least several persons;

(g) The victim was a public servant having lawful custody of the offender or another in the lawful performance of his or her official duties and the offender knew or should have known that the victim was a public servant performing his or her official duties;

(h) The murder was committed knowingly to disrupt or hinder the lawful exercise of any governmental function or the enforcement of the laws; or

(i) The victim was a law enforcement officer engaged in the lawful performance of his or her official duties as a law enforcement officer and the offender knew or reasonably should have known that the victim was a law enforcement officer.

(2) Mitigating Circumstances:

(a) The offender has no significant history of prior criminal activity;

(b) The offender acted under unusual pressures or influences or under the domination of another person;

(c) The crime was committed while the offender was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance;

(d) The age of the defendant at the time of the crime;

(e) The offender was an accomplice in the crime committed by another person and his or her participation was relatively minor;

(f) The victim was a participant in the defendant's conduct or consented to the act; or

(g) At the time of the crime, the capacity of the defendant to appreciate the wrongfulness of his or her conduct or to conform his or her conduct to the requirements of law was impaired as a result of mental illness, mental defect, or intoxication.
 
Guess the jury just used "common sense" as the prosecution entreated them to do. That liar will never be free again. All of the women who were duped by him can also begin to live their lives without fear.

The jury absolutely used their common sense. This is what I love about Nebraska and Nebraskans and JMO, it especially applies to those who live in the small towns and rural areas of the state.

From my experience, these are very fine, very strong-minded people who know the difference between right and wrong. They have compassionate hearts, but they are no one's fool. They will spot a lie a mile away. If I was charged with a crime, and I was innocent, I would hope to have a jury of people from rural Nebraska because I'd know I'd get a fair trial. On the other hand, if I was guilty, Nebraska is the last place I'd want to be.

AT got a fair trial, IMO. But the truth is the truth and the jury didn't buy his lies. They believed the prosecution's evidence. Bless that jury and bless Sydney's loving, wonderful family.

And most importantly, JUSTICE FOR SYDNEY!! One down and one to go.
 
The only way she pleads guilty is if they take the death penalty off the table. IMO

I would be very surprised if state would agree to take the death penalty off the table for BB. That's JMO, but people in Nebraska (I see you have Husker in your user name :)) , but do you remember when voters voted the death penalty back in a few years ago, after the legislature abolished it? A large margin of voters wanted it, and the Governor supports the the death penalty. From AT's trial, it appears the state has enough evidence on BB to get a guilty verdict, with the death penalty on the table. JMO

JMO
 
Oh, (d) definitely fits, and none of those mitigating circumstances apply, unless they say that BB made him do it.

Agreed that (d) fits as an aggravating factor.

I could see that his lawyers would be angling for mental or emotional disturbance (c) as a mitigating factor. They had him testify about witches/fantasies. He talked about lying to investigators and acting as if he was giving them clues (palm of your hand). He cut his neck and refused to come to court. His demeanor during his testimony was downright creepy. His cruelty in talking about his role with no emotion or sense of remorse-- in fact he seemed to get pleasure out of testifying. But I don't think he is mentally or emotionally disturbed enough to have it be a mitigating factor.
 
I don't think the state will agree to take the death penalty off the table for BB. That's JMO, but people in Nebraska voted the death penalty back in a few years ago by a large margin after the state legislature eliminated the death penalty. The majority of voters made their feelings clear on the subject and the Governor also supports the death penalty.

JMO

I'm not so sure. However, I think there's probably a stronger case against her than there was for AT, if that's possible.
 
I don't think the state will agree to take the death penalty off the table for BB. That's JMO, but people in Nebraska voted the death penalty back in a few years ago by a large margin after the state legislature eliminated the death penalty. The majority of voters made their feelings clear on the subject and the Governor also supports the death penalty.

JMO

What if her parents supported the decision not to seek the DP?
 
I'm not so sure. However, I think there's probably a stronger case against her than there was for AT, if that's possible.

AT admitted to being the person who wrapped the cord around her neck and choking her. I wonder if BB can argue that she didn't want her dead and, in fact, had been choked by AT just prior. I think the case of conspiracy is very strong (buying tools, grinder and pan, tarps, Tinder, seeking Sydney out/reassuring her) and the circumstances of Sydney's death will make it fairly easy to hold her to the murder charge. JMHO.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
167
Guests online
4,163
Total visitors
4,330

Forum statistics

Threads
593,537
Messages
17,988,535
Members
229,154
Latest member
Ammereignw
Back
Top