No surprise: DNA is a dud.

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by Shylock, Jun 4, 2004.

  1. Shylock

    Shylock Former Member

    Messages:
    1,058
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Article Published: Friday, June 04, 2004


    DNA found on JonBenét yields no match

    By Mike McPhee Karen Augé and Howard Pankratz
    Denver Post Staff Writers

    A DNA profile of blood taken from JonBenét Ramsey's underpants does not match any of the more than 1.5 million DNA profiles in the FBI's database, according to the Denver Police Department's crime lab.

    "I can tell you that the entire database has been searched, and not one profile was a match," said an officer familiar with the proceedings who did not want to be named.

    [snip]

    http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~56~2191170,00.html
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Nedthan Johns

    Nedthan Johns New Member

    Messages:
    1,371
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Our Foreign Faction Killers, have never been caught before. Gee they really are good!
     
  4. Show Me

    Show Me New Member

    Messages:
    3,868
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They must be "foreign factory faction" suspects....you'd think they would have foreign faction DNA database to go thru also. LOL
     
  5. Petronella

    Petronella Inactive

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The DNA has been a red herring all along. Dr. Lee was correct when he said, "This is not a DNA case."
     
  6. SisterSocks

    SisterSocks What a wild and crazy trip its been

    Messages:
    297
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Yep No DNA case "Rice aready cooked" Henry Lee
     
  7. K777angel

    K777angel New Member

    Messages:
    515
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Correct - this is not, has never been, and never will be a DNA case.
    Why is that significant? Simple. Because for as much T-I-M-E the killer spent with JonBenet and the things he did to her - there SHOULD be a lot of foreign DNA. There is not. There is but a teeny, weeny, microscopic speck that could have come from ANYWHERE. And did.
    It did not come from the person who killed her.
    And any DNA from her 3 family members in the house that night found on her would be explained away by any defense attorney as "belonging" there as they lived in the house with her. Easily explainable.

    So... we have never heard how much DNA they extracted from JonBenet's body and clothing that matched her father, mother or brother have we?
    There could be a plethora.
    Yet they focus soley on some teeny tiny speck found that could barely be stretched enough to call a sample - and lead you (the public) to believe that THIS is the "only" DNA found on her and at the crime scene.

    Forget the DNA angle. DNA is not a factor in this case. But plenty else is....
     
  8. Shylock

    Shylock Former Member

    Messages:
    1,058
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You got that right. Some people are so ignorant they think just because DNA contamination was entered into the CODIS database that makes it a valid DNA case. They'll go to there graves waiting for it be be matched to a non-existant person...LOL
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice