What an interesting article indeed! I have just spent a huge amount of time pouring over different articles and reading comments. Although much of the comments are pointless or mean, I was interested in people's opinion who may be close to key individuals. I didn't really intend to...just fell into one wormhole after the other. And, after everything I've read, I am more convinced than ever that Oral Hillary may be innocent. This article does a great job of summing up just how "complicated" this case has become. I'm still not entirely convinced that Sheriff Jones is guilty. I'm leaning towards him, but really it could be anyone with a motive to enter the home. One thing that really intrigued me is the information about the assistant coach. I knew he was one of the alibi witnesses, but until this article, we had not heard much about it. Some people think the signs that followed him downstate are creepy, but it doesn't bother me in that way. I see it more as possibly the desperate act of one of GP's family members...who clearly believe he is lying. That person needs to seriously question WHY he would protect the killer of an innocent child. It makes no sense!! Perhaps the person placing the signs needs to believe the assistant is lying, because the alternative would force them to find someone else to blame-someone they may not want to consider? I find it even more fascinating that the police repeatedly tried to get Ian F. to change his statement. Again, why in the world would he protect a killer? They are not related, did not serve in the army together, etc... Are the police just so convinced he is lying, or are they trying to protect Jones?