Deceased/Not Found NY - Michele Harris, 35, Owego, 11 Sept 2001

Discussion in '2000's Missing' started by PonderingThings, Feb 10, 2006.

  1. Tripod

    Tripod Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    4,113
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not so sure he's got that much money left, or many friends. Haven't heard anything lately but I do think of his wife and children.
     
    silversurvivor likes this.
  2. Jmoose

    Jmoose Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,182
    Likes Received:
    649
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think of them, too. He seems like such a hothead when you look at his tweets, and other things. That by itself makes me think he could have been responsible for her disappearance, and then when you add to it the fact that he was cheating on her and they were divorcing, plus all of the stuff they offered as evidence at 3 trials where juries convicted him...I still don’t understand how he managed to get 3 retrials; that just never happens. Who does he know to have that happen? He may not have a lot of money left, as you said, but it just seems like he has some influence on someone important enough, doesn’t it?
     
  3. Tripod

    Tripod Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    4,113
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, my SO was on jury #3. I can only go by everything that had been in the news, on the television shows that covered the case, and by what was presented during that very long trial. I fully understood why that was a hung jury with no conviction, and also fully understood why the last trial, which was a bench trial, ended in an acquittal by the judge. There was definitely reasonable doubt. We'll probably never know the full truth.
     
    silversurvivor and Jmoose like this.
  4. Jmoose

    Jmoose Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,182
    Likes Received:
    649
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you for adding your information to this. I understand about the trial(s) and reasonable doubt, as the evidence was all circumstantial, but I am floored that he got so many do-overs. It’s relatively rare to be awarded one retrial, much less three of them.
     
    Tripod likes this.
  5. Tripod

    Tripod Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    4,113
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It certainly was unusual, yes. There were without doubt technical, legal mistakes causing retrials the first 2 times. There were many questions as to whether the prosecutor would or should go ahead with yet another retrial after the 3rd ended in a hung jury. He decided to go for it, which I think was probably a mistake. Cal Harris' attorney was really smart to role the dice and go ahead with a bench trial, with no jury, for the 4th.
     
    silversurvivor and Jmoose like this.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice