When did they place him under arrest? How was it worded? I am not even sure if they actually did place him under arrest.
Just watched it again and I still do not consider what he was doing as resisting arrest. He is pleading to have a conversation and talk about it. There is no doubt in my mind he would have done what they said. He just wanted to talk about WHY. What's the big deal. Talk to him for a bit in a respectful way and things would have been fine.
I would love to see what was all going on before the videos started. For me that is a big missing piece, it looked like the cops were starting to get closer to him, and without knowing exactly what was going on. Maybe there was surveillance tape that the jury got to see? Would I get in trouble if I said it kind of looked like a set up? Because it kind of did to me, but like everyone else we don't have all the facts.