Agree about the later isolation and radicalization that may have led to his extreme response. There are probably many factors that could have contributed to that, I hope they look into his online discussions and activities.Well personally I don’t care what a person’s/victim’s socioeconomic status is, be they a top executive at a company, or a drug addicted homeless person or prostitute living on the fringes of society, no one has the right to assassinate/execute any person in cold blood, for any reason. Period.
I agree with some other members’ thoughts that LM’s back issues may have played a role early on but imo, once he started isolating himself he became radicalized and it became more about the big corporation, greed and I’m gonna start a revolution by taking things into my own hands and (paraphrased) wack those parasites because they deserve it/have it coming to them, all for my cause and for the American people. (I reiterate that LM does not speak or act on behalf of ALL of the American people).
IMO issues with healthcare and some health insurance companies has been going on for a very long time and some great, dedicated people have been and are advocating for changes by doing it the right way- civilized, going through the proper channels etc. to try and effect change. Yes it is frustrating that change hasn’t happened as fast as we may think it should (and maybe it never will change), but regardless, the point is that this is the way to go about making changes in a civilized society.
LM (nor anyone, mentally ill or not) has the right to be Judge, Jury, Executioner assassinating people in the streets or wherever, that they don’t like or agree with for whatever reason, whether it be because they don’t like the person, a company’s policies, their profits, their top executives salaries etc, etc.
It is against the law to take the law into one’s own hands and execute someone in cold blood. It is uncivilized, vigilantism and should neither be applauded nor accepted.
Ever.
IMHOO
ETA- clarity
ETA 2- I was quoting a post from the previous thread which I noticed didn’t pull over cuz issues posting from my mobile device ugh, apologies.
He was likely vulnerable due to his back and other health problems and loss of work, but it would be interesting to know who he was socializing with in online discussion groups. As I’ve e tio Ed before, the health care activist community in the US is a fairly tame group, not given to discussions of violence. They’re usually nerdy. I keep wondering who he might have encountered that caused him to suddenly think violence was the answer.
I hope LE is looking into it.