Found Alive OH - A. C., 14, Barberton, 4 Dec 2017

Discussion in 'Located Persons Discussion' started by Dalagali, Dec 6, 2017.

  1. Owutatangledweb

    Owutatangledweb Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,001
    Likes Received:
    7,618
    Trophy Points:
    113


  2. Owutatangledweb

    Owutatangledweb Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,001
    Likes Received:
    7,618
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Statutory rape in Ohio is age 13. http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2907.02v1

    Proof and charge would come after the baby is born, with a DNA test unless the victim has other proof such as testimony. And even then, they will want the DNA evidence at time of charge or later.

    If, however, she was forced. That equals Rape.

    And if they took off while mom was in sheetz, how do we know AC went willingly if no one else saw them?
     
  3. Rodnester

    Rodnester Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    1,712
    Trophy Points:
    93
    I ran them through Google translate. It appears that these are inoculous. The second one is a fan club to an Arabic. Female singer Alashanak. He just replied to a verse from one of her songs. "
    You are enough if you follow from a distance" kind of appropriate considering at the time of the post, AC just went back to her mom.
     
  4. flute4peace

    flute4peace Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,626
    Likes Received:
    14,873
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wow 13 is young! !! The age of consent in my state is 16. There's a variety of different charges based upon ages of both parties involved, but all are felonies.

    So if she's not considered a victim or potential victim of a sex crime, I guess they can use her name publicly until he's located and charged?

    Sent from my SCH-I435L using Tapatalk
     
  5. cujenn81

    cujenn81 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,167
    Likes Received:
    9,041
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Same here - that's just insane to me!

    ETA: the statute at the link actually says "UNDER the age of 13". so really, even if she were only 13, he could not be charged with statutory rape. That's mind boggling.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  6. Gigglingtoes

    Gigglingtoes Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,717
    Likes Received:
    876
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Guess she's in the right place for the "inappropriate Mom" group :winner:
     
  7. Lilibet

    Lilibet Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    17,015
    Likes Received:
    60,248
    Trophy Points:
    113
    BBM

    You're right. We don’t know for sure if she went willingly. We also don’t know for sure she is pregnant or autistic or needs meds. Everything is based on the mom’s stories. At this point, LE isn’t calling this an abduction or kidnapping. That’s all I’ve got. Sigh.
     
  8. Lilibet

    Lilibet Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    17,015
    Likes Received:
    60,248
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is she ever! And somehow “inappropriate” and “mom” just don’t belong in the same sentence. Why would a mother take pride in being improper and unsuitable per the definition at the link?

    https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/inappropriate
     
  9. Jethro4WS

    Jethro4WS Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,037
    Likes Received:
    35,028
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are looking at the wrong law. This is the appropriate law in Ohio
    http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2907.04v1

    2907.04 Unlawful sexual conduct with minor.
    (A) No person who is eighteen years of age or older shall engage in sexual conduct with another, who is not the spouse of the offender, when the offender knows the other person is thirteen years of age or older but less than sixteen years of age, or the offender is reckless in that regard.


    (B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor.


    (1) Except as otherwise provided in divisions (B)(2), (3), and (4) of this section, unlawful sexual conduct with a minor is a felony of the fourth degree.


    (2) Except as otherwise provided in division (B)(4) of this section, if the offender is less than four years older than the other person, unlawful sexual conduct with a minor is a misdemeanor of the first degree.


    (3) Except as otherwise provided in division (B)(4) of this section, if the offender is ten or more years older than the other person, unlawful sexual conduct with a minor is a felony of the third degree.


    (4) If the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a violation of section 2907.02, 2907.03, or 2907.04 of the Revised Code or a violation of former section 2907.12 of the Revised Code, unlawful sexual conduct with a minor is a felony of the second degree.


    Effective Date: 10-17-2000.
     
  10. MsPooh

    MsPooh Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,378
    Likes Received:
    1,215
    Trophy Points:
    113
    She has a post on there about Aspergers and commented "I have it"..
     
  11. doyoulovemepfg

    doyoulovemepfg Verified Insider - Faith Threet case

    Messages:
    2,025
    Likes Received:
    11,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Can someone link AC's insta again?
     
  12. LaborDayRN

    LaborDayRN In a world where you can be anything, be kind

    Messages:
    9,203
    Likes Received:
    28,253
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Everyone is different. My son came out to me at 14. His close friends all knew at school. This is before Facebook days though. I think it's like everything else. Some people post every move they make, every word their family and friends say. Some people post nothing at all.
     
  13. cujenn81

    cujenn81 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,167
    Likes Received:
    9,041
    Trophy Points:
    113
    OK - here is what I found on BeenVerified in regards to LJ's criminal background.

    Escape - 01/06/2016 (Case #CR-16-602551-A)
    - violation of his conditional release occurred on 01/06/2016; arrested on 01/07/2016; released on home detention with GPS monitoring - pled guilty on 5/12/2016 and received 6 months sentence to be served at Lorain; received a credit for 126 days of time served

    RSP <<< I have no idea what this even is

    Writing Bad Checks (Case #2017CRB00930)
    - shows case still open

    Aggravated Theft (Case #CR-15-592849-A)
    - shows case still open

    Forgery; Forging Identification Cards (Case #CR-15-592849-A) - NOT GUILTY by jury

    Theft (11/09/2002) - NOT GUILTY by jury

    Obstruction of Justice (11/09/2002) - GUILTY by jury

    Involuntary Manslaughter (11/09/2003) - PLED GUILTY; all convictions from crimes committed on 11/09/2002 were combined into one sentence of 10 years to be served @ Lorain Correctional Facility

    Burglary (11/09/2002) - GUILTY by jury

    B/E (11/09/2002) - GUILTY by jury

    Attempted Arson (11/09/2002) - GUILTY by jury

    Arson (11/09/2002) - GUILTY by jury

    Additional notes related to imprisonment related to 11/09/2002 crimes:
    - referred to psych clinic on 07/01/2003 and returned to jail 09/19/2003
    - transferred to Lorain Correctional Facility on 12/22/2003
    - received credit for time served amounting to 243 days on 02/12/2013
    - received additional credit for time served for 31 days held at detention center on 02/25/2013
    - released 5/29/2013


    3/29/2014 - Passing Bad Checks
    - case was dismissed on 2/2/2015 and transferred to Cuyahoga County Court to bind with other charges

    2/6/2015 - Assured Clear Distance MVA <<< I don't know what this means (Case #14TRD05745)

    3/18/2015 - Criminal Simulation <<< I don't know what this means either (Case #14CRB00413)

    10/7/2016 - Theft / Forgery

    Admit Date: 10/7/2016
    Sentence: 9 months
    Expected Stated Term: 12/22/2016
    Actual Release: 10/30/2017
    Supervision Start Date: 12/22/2016 (3 years supervision)
    Current Status: APA Supervision Violator at Large
    Offender ID: EEA46054600

    7/10/2017 - Reasonable Control <<< I STILL don't know what this means (Case #17TRD02996)
    8/2/2017 - Violating Protection Order (Case #17CRB00751-A)
    8/9/2017 - Endangering Child (Case #17CRB00690-B)
    8/9/2017 - Criminal Damaging or Endangerment (Case #17CRB00690-A)
    - the last four charges are listed as open


    You can read the dockets for most of these cases by performing a name search at https://cpdocket.cp.cuyahogacounty.us/Search.aspx


    :eek:
    sorry... that took a good while to compile.
    (I'm a poet didn't know it.)
     
  14. cujenn81

    cujenn81 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,167
    Likes Received:
    9,041
    Trophy Points:
    113
    OH THANK GOD!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  15. doyoulovemepfg

    doyoulovemepfg Verified Insider - Faith Threet case

    Messages:
    2,025
    Likes Received:
    11,659
    Trophy Points:
    113
  16. 2Hope4

    2Hope4 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes Received:
    11,473
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Great job! Thank you for doing this.

    In regards to the Assured clear distance, MVA... notice the case has TRD. It's a traffic related offense. Most likely the same as failure to maintain distance resulting in a motor vehicle accident, IMO.

    The other one, reasonable control, again has the TRD. I think it would be failure to maintain control of vehicle.

    Criminal Simulation is a class A misdemeanor, section 170.45. If with intent to defraud, a person makes or alters anything in a way that it appears to be of value such as an antique or rare item for the purpose of trade or sale to profit greater from it.

    http://www.answers.com/Q/What_is_criminal_simulation

    The protection order violation, was that in reference to AC or someone else?
     
  17. 2Hope4

    2Hope4 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes Received:
    11,473
    Trophy Points:
    113
  18. 2Hope4

    2Hope4 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes Received:
    11,473
    Trophy Points:
    113
  19. jnblsm

    jnblsm Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,454
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The one picture of just her green eye looks like she was crying.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  20. jnblsm

    jnblsm Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,454
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree that there is no reason at all to believe "mom" but nobody else in the family has disputed the missing poster info about the pregnancy nor the autism. I mean specifically dad and other relatives. They shared the posters. Granted, they might have just been told about a pregnancy, but would've curtailed incorrect information about autism,imo


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice