RAISINISBACK
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2016
- Messages
- 4,617
- Reaction score
- 21,528
Doesn't it make you wonder why that is? This family has been painted as horrible people but the only proof they were doing anything illegal was an exaggeration made by Dewine himself. Each and every person killed that night is a victim. Why would anyone in LE make statements about the guilt of the Rhodens' without having the facts to back them up? It was said as if it were fact. What we know it there was no breaking down of a grow operation and if you grow up in Appalachia you know what the breaking down of a 500k operation looks like. So I am asking why do you think it was stated? Why do you think people keep bring up drugs where these victims are concerned? And my last one how many of you think this is probably something we are missing altogether?
I lied I have more. Dewine assumed there was weed and/or drugs right? Do you think someone else did too? Is it a fact KR had money laying around him?
BBM
Someone mentioned the Crystal Rodgers case so yesterday I spent a while listening to the interviews done with Nick and Brooks Houck. They are guilty as sin. All that "I don't remember" nonsense. Where were you last week? I don't remember. Where were you yesterday? I don't remember. Where are you right now? I don't remember. Those two are slicker than oil on ice. They found blood on a blanket in the trunk of Nicks police car. Brooks was the last to see her alive. He admitted they were arguing. They caught them both in several lies. But yet they have not been arrested or charged.
I do not think we are missing anything. I think that LE knows exactly who killed the R's. They have as much as told the public with their "laser focus" on the W's. They have as much as warned the public with that statement about any dealings anyone has with the W's. They just don't have enough to arrest them. I can imagine that LE got a whole lot of "I don't remembers and I don't knows" from the W's also.
JMO